Re: Integrating with CTM:People vs. BMC_People

2011-08-10 Thread Garrison, Sean (Norcross)
) [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Rick Cook Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 3:53 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Integrating with CTM:People vs. BMC_People ** This isn't based on anything but educated guesses, so with that in mind let me see if I have the structure down: In pre-7.6

Re: Integrating with CTM:People vs. BMC_People

2011-08-10 Thread strauss
) [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Garrison, Sean (Norcross) Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 3:27 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Integrating with CTM:People vs. BMC_People ** We are on ITSM 7.6 patch 1 so my answers on based on that. I personally have found the BMC_Person class

Re: Integrating with CTM:People vs. BMC_People

2011-08-03 Thread Brian Pancia
unlimited pointers into unlimited systems for people data. From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Rick Cook Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 3:53 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Integrating with CTM:People vs. BMC_People

Integrating with CTM:People vs. BMC_People

2011-08-02 Thread Pierson, Shawn
Good afternoon, As I'm upgrading from ITSM 7.0.3 to 7.6.4, one thing I'd like to do is continue to have my People data updated from Active Directory. For 7.0.3, I built an integration where some escalations run and dump the People data into a staging form that then goes into CTM:People.

Re: Integrating with CTM:People vs. BMC_People

2011-08-02 Thread Roger Justice
, Aug 2, 2011 2:07 pm Subject: Integrating with CTM:People vs. BMC_People ** Good afternoon, As I’m upgrading from ITSM 7.0.3 to 7.6.4, one thing I’d like to do is continue to have my People data updated from Active Directory. For 7.0.3, I built an integration where some escalations run

Re: Integrating with CTM:People vs. BMC_People

2011-08-02 Thread Ben Chernys
Subject: Integrating with CTM:People vs. BMC_People ** Good afternoon, As I'm upgrading from ITSM 7.0.3 to 7.6.4, one thing I'd like to do is continue to have my People data updated from Active Directory. For 7.0.3, I built an integration where some escalations run and dump the People

Re: Integrating with CTM:People vs. BMC_People

2011-08-02 Thread Tommy Morris
list(ARSList) [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Pierson, Shawn Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 1:07 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Integrating with CTM:People vs. BMC_People ** Good afternoon, As I'm upgrading from ITSM 7.0.3 to 7.6.4, one thing I'd like to do is continue

Re: Integrating with CTM:People vs. BMC_People

2011-08-02 Thread strauss
discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Pierson, Shawn Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 1:07 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Integrating with CTM:People vs. BMC_People ** Good afternoon, As I'm upgrading from ITSM 7.0.3 to 7.6.4, one thing I'd like to do is continue

Re: Integrating with CTM:People vs. BMC_People

2011-08-02 Thread Rick Cook
: Integrating with CTM:People vs. BMC_People ** ** ** An OOB filter triggers off of CTM:People that creates/ updates BMC_PERSON just push to CTM:People and set ‘z1d Action’ to “PEOPLESYNC_CREATE” or “PEOPLESYNC_UPDATE”. You will be able to see a new record create in BMC.Sandbox