Re: Merging of non-reconciled child CIs

2008-10-31 Thread P Romain ARSlist
regardless of the parent. Cheers Peter -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Worsdell Sent: 30 October 2008 06:35 To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Merging of non-reconciled child CIs The difficulty

Re: Merging of non-reconciled child CIs

2008-10-31 Thread Matt Worsdell
: Re: Merging of non-reconciled child CIs The difficulty is ascertaining what a child ci is. Could be dependant or component, however quite valid stand alone cis may utilise those relationships. Another suggestion, how about you fire in and validate after. You could run a compare job prior

Re: Merging of non-reconciled child CIs

2008-10-31 Thread P Romain ARSlist
@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Merging of non-reconciled child CIs The difficulty is ascertaining what a child ci is. Could be dependant or component, however quite valid stand alone cis may utilise those relationships. Another suggestion, how about you fire in and validate after. You could run a compare

Re: Merging of non-reconciled child CIs

2008-10-31 Thread Tim O'Connor
or not. -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of P Romain ARSlist Sent: Friday, October 31, 2008 3:23 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Merging of non-reconciled child CIs Matt, The CMDB does exactly what I think

Re: Merging of non-reconciled child CIs

2008-10-31 Thread Matt Worsdell
, October 31, 2008 4:49 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Merging of non-reconciled child CIs Romain, So lets say I auto-identify base element, which should give a RE id to all populated instances. That means its also going to auto identify all comp sys instances, basically its just going

Re: Merging of non-reconciled child CIs

2008-10-31 Thread Peter Romain
by the qualification group or not. -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of P Romain ARSlist Sent: Friday, October 31, 2008 3:23 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Merging of non-reconciled child CIs

Re: Merging of non-reconciled child CIs

2008-10-31 Thread Tim O'Connor
: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter Romain Sent: Friday, October 31, 2008 11:09 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Merging of non-reconciled child CIs Tim, I think I might have misled you in my earlier reply. You need a reconciliation

Re: Merging of non-reconciled child CIs

2008-10-30 Thread Matt Worsdell
an attribute flag to highlight ci for valiation? -Original Message- From: Tim O'Connor [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2008 12:40 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Merging of non-reconciled child CIs Matt, It sounds like the functionality I am looking for is not there. I

Merging of non-reconciled child CIs

2008-10-29 Thread Tim O'Connor
I'm looking for a method whereby I can enforce a slow and methodical inclusion of hosts into BMC ASSET from discovery tool datasets. By not auto-identifying BMC_ComputerSystem instances in the discovery tool dataset, I can prevent them from being merged into BMC ASSET unless a

Re: Merging of non-reconciled child CIs

2008-10-29 Thread Matt Worsdell
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim O'Connor Sent: 29 October 2008 20:07 To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Merging of non-reconciled child CIs I'm looking for a method whereby I can enforce a slow and methodical inclusion of hosts into BMC ASSET from discovery tool datasets. By not auto-identifying

Re: Merging of non-reconciled child CIs

2008-10-29 Thread Tim O'Connor
datasets. -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Worsdell Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2008 3:15 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Merging of non-reconciled child CIs Tim If the child CIs have not been given