Re: SRM 2.1 and various bugs

2008-01-18 Thread Savant, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes, please do. Thanks! -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 1:07 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: SRM 2.1 and various bugs The fix I received from BMC

Re: SRM 2.1 and various bugs

2008-01-17 Thread haeyoon . lee
IL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 11:46 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: SRM 2.1 and various bugs > > Hi, > > Does anyone have SRM 2.1 installed in dev or prod? > We have it set up but have numerous issues.  It is an upgrade from SRM > 2.0. > > First, i

Re: SRM 2.1 and various bugs

2008-01-17 Thread Savant, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: SRM 2.1 and various bugs Hi, Does anyone have SRM 2.1 installed in dev or prod? We have it set up but have numerous issues. It is an upgrade from SRM 2.0. First, it seems the email confirmation to end user on the SRM:Request form doesn't send out. Second, out

Re: SRM 2.1 and various bugs

2008-01-17 Thread haeyoon . lee
2nd issue. Answers not pushing to work order is a defect. It will be fixed in SRM 2.1 patch 1. Or you can request the fix. SW00283237 On Jan 17, 2:46 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi, > > Does anyone have SRM 2.1 installed in dev or prod? > We have it set up but have numerous issues.  It is an

SRM 2.1 and various bugs

2008-01-17 Thread haeyoon . lee
Hi, Does anyone have SRM 2.1 installed in dev or prod? We have it set up but have numerous issues. It is an upgrade from SRM 2.0. First, it seems the email confirmation to end user on the SRM:Request form doesn't send out. Second, out of the box question/answer values don't push to the work orde