Re: Search on New fields on archived form

Thanks Carey. I will try to do it using Active Link. Regards, Chintan. Carey Matthew Black <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The reason for this is that ARS does some funny (strange) things with searches on field 1. Specifically I have never seen the full logic spelled out in the docs, but here is wh

Re: Search on New fields on archived form

The reason for this is that ARS does some funny (strange) things with searches on field 1. Specifically I have never seen the full logic spelled out in the docs, but here is what I think it does if (User input length is less than length of field 1) then LPad the value with the prefix for f

Re: Search on New fields on archived form

;t work? -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chintan Shah Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2008 4:26 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Search on New fields on archived form ** Hi all, Once you archive the form, two new fi

Re: Search on New fields on archived form

So setting the QBE behavior to "anywhere" didn't work? -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chintan Shah Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2008 4:26 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Search on New fields o

Search on New fields on archived form

Hi all, Once you archive the form, two new fields "Original Create Date" and "Original Request ID" are created. ...so far so good. Problem starts when end-users start searching on "Original Request ID" and get a no matching request back. That field is a Character Field. So, request ID 70 on S