2008 16:09:41 -0700
From: Joe DeSouza [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Similar Group Names
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
**
Depending on how you have structured your Group ID's
you are less likelier to get this error if you base
your search criteria on the Group ID of the group
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2008 8:19:25 AM
Subject: Re: Similar Group Names
Joe,
Wouldn't '$GROUP$ like (100012; + %)' depend on 100012; being the first
group on the list?
How about '$GROUP$ like (100012; + %) or '$GROUP$ like (%;100012
: Similar Group Names
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
**
Depending on how you have structured your Group ID's
you are less likelier to get this error if you base
your search criteria on the Group ID of the group.
It is a good practice therefore to have a good group
ID naming convention
= ?? How would equal to find a string if its in the middle?
Joe
- Original Message
From: Axton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2008 10:34:34 AM
Subject: Re: Similar Group Names
A better approach is to parse the group list into an external qual
]
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2008 10:34:34 AM
Subject: Re: Similar Group Names
A better approach is to parse the group list into an external qual. e.g.,
1;2;3
into
'groupid' = 1 or 'groupid' = 2 or 'groupid' = 3
Axton Grams
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 8:19 AM, Dwayne Martin
Don't you just have to love the LIKE %Groupname% functionality?
That's HD 5x for you... it is because of the LIKE queries...
To get around this in the past we put a non-descript character in the
group name which is getting 'duplicated' so your your example if you change
Quest to Quest. (with a
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Similar Group Names
**
Don't you just have to love the LIKE %Groupname% functionality?
That's HD 5x for you... it is because of the LIKE queries...
To get around this in the past we put a non-descript character in the
group name which is getting
of the C104 column in your T table of the User
schema to arrive at what might be the best search for you..
Joe
- Original Message
From: Robert Molenda [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 6:46:07 PM
Subject: Re: Similar Group Names
**
Don't you
into a limitation like you have..
Joe
- Original Message
From: Shane Buchholz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 6:33:09 PM
Subject: Similar Group Names
**
I ran into an interesting problem today with group names that are similar. One
group is called Quest
Hi Shane,
You may like to try changing the QBE value to 'Exact' for the Group field
(field properties) in the Group form.
Regards,
SriSamSri Appecherla
Mobile# +91 991 610 6008
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 4:03 AM, Shane Buchholz [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
**
I ran into an interesting problem
That's probably not going to help and it is ill-advised to change the
core forms (e.g., User, Group). You should always use the run process
command that checks group membership based on groupid or use an equal
comparison.
Axton Grams
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 10:18 PM, sam appecherla
[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 11:00:42 PM
Subject: Re: Similar Group Names
That's probably not going to help and it is ill-advised to change the core
forms (e.g., User, Group). You should always use the run process command that
checks group membership based
12 matches
Mail list logo
