Re: Fwd: Re: The value(s) for this entry violate a unique index that has been defined for this form, 382 when saving an Active Link (UNCLASSIFIED)

2013-08-14 Thread Glen Hartle
There's a good chance that arerror.log has recorded the server attempting to load the rogue active link at startup. If that is the case, and the active link is corrupt, it will not appear in the admin tool, but will still exist in the database. This would subsequently result in the unique inde

Re: The value(s) for this entry violate a unique index that has been defined for this form, 382 when saving an Active Link (UNCLASSIFIED)

2013-08-14 Thread Ray Gellenbeck
ent the entry ID for the relationships. I > suspect they do the same for the other meta data. > > Fred > > From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) > [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Longwing, Lj > Sent: Friday, August 09, 2013 4:19 PM > To: ars

Re: The value(s) for this entry violate a unique index that has been defined for this form, 382 when saving an Active Link (UNCLASSIFIED)

2013-08-12 Thread Jason Miller
hear anything else, I'll let you know > > > > Gordon Frank > > ------------------ > > *From: *"Frederick W Grooms" > *To: *arslist@ARSLIST.ORG > *Sent: *Friday, August 9, 2013 5:58:27 PM > > *Subject: *Re: The value(s) for this entry violate

Re: The value(s) for this entry violate a unique index that has been defined for this form, 382 when saving an Active Link (UNCLASSIFIED)

2013-08-12 Thread Gordon Frank
Frank - Original Message - From: "Frederick W Grooms" To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Sent: Friday, August 9, 2013 5:58:27 PM Subject: Re: The value(s) for this entry violate a unique index that has been defined for this form, 382 when saving an Active Link (UNCLASSIFIED) **

Re: The value(s) for this entry violate a unique index that has been defined for this form, 382 when saving an Active Link (UNCLASSIFIED)

2013-08-09 Thread Jason Miller
bring the list back up. >> >> ----- Original Message - >> From: "Rick Cook" ** >> >> To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG >> Sent: Friday, August 9, 2013 3:30:08 PM >> Subject: Re: The value(s) for this entry violate a unique index that has >> been

Re: The value(s) for this entry violate a unique index that has been defined for this form, 382 when saving an Active Link (UNCLASSIFIED)

2013-08-09 Thread Longwing, Lj
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG > Sent: Friday, August 9, 2013 3:30:08 PM > Subject: Re: The value(s) for this entry violate a unique index that has been > defined for this form, 382 when saving an Active Link (UNCLASSIFIED) > > ** > Like LJ said, it's not Java. There is, in th

Fwd: Re: The value(s) for this entry violate a unique index that has been defined for this form, 382 when saving an Active Link (UNCLASSIFIED)

2013-08-09 Thread gjjmss
che in the Dev Studio workspace and then log back into the server and bring the list back up. - Original Message - From: "Rick Cook"  To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Sent: Friday, August 9, 2013 3:30:08 PM Subject: Re: The value(s) for this entry violate a unique index that has b

Re: The value(s) for this entry violate a unique index that has been defined for this form, 382 when saving an Active Link (UNCLASSIFIED)

2013-08-09 Thread Jason Miller
ev Studio workspace and then log back into the > server and bring the list back up. > > - Original Message - > From: "Rick Cook" > To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG > Sent: Friday, August 9, 2013 3:30:08 PM > Subject: Re: The value(s) for this entry violate a unique ind

Re: The value(s) for this entry violate a unique index that has been defined for this form, 382 when saving an Active Link (UNCLASSIFIED)

2013-08-09 Thread pritch
rom: "Rick Cook" To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Sent: Friday, August 9, 2013 3:30:08 PM Subject: Re: The value(s) for this entry violate a unique index that has been defined for this form, 382 when saving an Active Link (UNCLASSIFIED) ** Like LJ said, it's not Java.  There is, in the

Re: The value(s) for this entry violate a unique index that has been defined for this form, 382 when saving an Active Link (UNCLASSIFIED)

2013-08-09 Thread Rick Cook
Like LJ said, it's not Java. There is, in the metadata, an Active Link with the same name as the one you're saving. I did think about the possibility that an action in the Active Link might cause that error, but I don't think so. Only adding a Unique attribute to an index would give you that if

Re: The value(s) for this entry violate a unique index that has been defined for this form, 382 when saving an Active Link (UNCLASSIFIED)

2013-08-09 Thread Gordon Frank
Sorry, I forgot to change the subject line on the original -Original Message- From: gjj...@comcast.net [mailto:gjj...@comcast.net] Sent: Friday, August 09, 2013 3:18 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Cc: Frank, Gordon M CTR (US) Subject: Re: SLM 7.6.04 Service Target Milestones not appeari