There's a good chance that arerror.log has recorded the server attempting to
load the rogue active link at startup. If that is the case, and the active
link is corrupt, it will not appear in the admin tool, but will still exist in
the database. This would subsequently result in the unique inde
ent the entry ID for the relationships. I
> suspect they do the same for the other meta data.
>
> Fred
>
> From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
> [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Longwing, Lj
> Sent: Friday, August 09, 2013 4:19 PM
> To: ars
hear anything else, I'll let you know
>
>
>
> Gordon Frank
>
> ------------------
>
> *From: *"Frederick W Grooms"
> *To: *arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
> *Sent: *Friday, August 9, 2013 5:58:27 PM
>
> *Subject: *Re: The value(s) for this entry violate
Frank
- Original Message -
From: "Frederick W Grooms"
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Sent: Friday, August 9, 2013 5:58:27 PM
Subject: Re: The value(s) for this entry violate a unique index that has been
defined for this form, 382 when saving an Active Link (UNCLASSIFIED)
**
bring the list back up.
>>
>> ----- Original Message -
>> From: "Rick Cook" **
>>
>> To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
>> Sent: Friday, August 9, 2013 3:30:08 PM
>> Subject: Re: The value(s) for this entry violate a unique index that has
>> been
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
> Sent: Friday, August 9, 2013 3:30:08 PM
> Subject: Re: The value(s) for this entry violate a unique index that has been
> defined for this form, 382 when saving an Active Link (UNCLASSIFIED)
>
> **
> Like LJ said, it's not Java. There is, in th
che in the Dev Studio workspace and then log back into the server and bring the list back up.
- Original Message -
From: "Rick Cook"
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Sent: Friday, August 9, 2013 3:30:08 PM
Subject: Re: The value(s) for this entry violate a unique index that has b
ev Studio workspace and then log back into the
> server and bring the list back up.
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Rick Cook"
> To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
> Sent: Friday, August 9, 2013 3:30:08 PM
> Subject: Re: The value(s) for this entry violate a unique ind
rom: "Rick Cook"
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Sent: Friday, August 9, 2013 3:30:08 PM
Subject: Re: The value(s) for this entry violate a unique index that has been
defined for this form, 382 when saving an Active Link (UNCLASSIFIED)
**
Like LJ said, it's not Java. There is, in the
Like LJ said, it's not Java. There is, in the metadata, an Active Link
with the same name as the one you're saving. I did think about the
possibility that an action in the Active Link might cause that error, but I
don't think so. Only adding a Unique attribute to an index would give you
that if
Sorry, I forgot to change the subject line on the original
-Original Message-
From: gjj...@comcast.net [mailto:gjj...@comcast.net]
Sent: Friday, August 09, 2013 3:18 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Cc: Frank, Gordon M CTR (US)
Subject: Re: SLM 7.6.04 Service Target Milestones not appeari
11 matches
Mail list logo