Re: WWRUG specials is an infringement on Vendors that do go, unless the Vendor was there

2012-10-22 Thread arslist
communication from me on or off the list. Daniel -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of John Baker Sent: October 22, 2012 3:50 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: WWRUG specials is an infringement on Vendors that do

Re: WWRUG specials is an infringement on Vendors that do go, unless the Vendor was there

2012-10-22 Thread arslist
Clark Sent: October 22, 2012 3:19 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: WWRUG specials is an infringement on Vendors that do go, unless the Vendor was there ** >From looking back over the notes, I think technically Dan drew first blood. Granted I'm doing some statistical work today, so

WWRUG specials is an infringement on Vendors that do go, unless the Vendor was there

2012-10-22 Thread John Baker
Susan I don't care if someone wants to have a go at me for X, Y or Z. I do care if someone wants to point fault at JSS products or service, because that's a real mark of failure. And if there's failure, I will get it fixed and fall over myself to apologise, which is why I believe we've earned

Re: WWRUG specials is an infringement on Vendors that do go, unless the Vendor was there

2012-10-22 Thread David M. Clark
er 22, 2012 1:54 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: WWRUG specials is an infringement on Vendors that do go, unless the Vendor was there ** John, >From a 'customer' perspective, I'd recommend you stop the replies to the list. > This is not a positive image for your com

Re: WWRUG specials is an infringement on Vendors that do go, unless the Vendor was there

2012-10-22 Thread Susan Palmer
John, >From a 'customer' perspective, I'd recommend you stop the replies to the list. This is not a positive image for your company or product. Susan Palmer On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 1:10 PM, John Baker wrote: > Dan, > > I sent two vendors to RUG with lots of information for those who popped by

WWRUG specials is an infringement on Vendors that do go, unless the Vendor was there

2012-10-22 Thread John Baker
Dan, I sent two vendors to RUG with lots of information for those who popped by their stands :) You'll be banning Christmas next. If the subject line contains (adv), you don't have to read it. And I really have no idea what you're wittering on about "legal" issues. You're funny :) John ___

WWRUG specials is an infringement on Vendors that do go, unless the Vendor was there

2012-10-22 Thread dan
John I don' t see the relevance of me attending KEG to you attending KEG or WWRUG? The primary issue with your WWRUG special is copyright and branding infringement. Vendors pay money to be associated with the conference, and attendance is of course optional, some vendors come every other year.