I'm confused - the doc seems to conflict and BMC architects have signed
off on our ar.cfg settings in the past in which they were set by CPU and
not by Cores.
My previous understanding was that these values should be set by the
number of CPUs and not Cores, in fact BMC architects have signed of
or my loose and probably improper
usage of terms..but that's roughly how I think of it J
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Goodall, Andrew C
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2012 5:57 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: fast and list t
and probably improper
> usage of terms….but that’s roughly how I think of it J
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:
> arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] *On Behalf Of *Goodall, Andrew C
> *Sent:* Thursday, March 22, 2012 5:57 PM
> *To:* arslist@
ur processing power should be better than a single core on a
>> single cpu….
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> I know I’m going to get a lot of flack for my loose and probably improper
>> usage of terms….but that’s roughly how I think of it J
>>
>> ** **
&
ystem discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Axton
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2012 11:12 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: fast and list threads - by cores or cpus? - documentation
conflicts.
** To add to that, the goals of setting the queue thread settings should
n
> referring to CPU power….it’s my understanding that to make a quad core cpu,
> they shrunk the technology of a single core to be able to fit 4 dies on the
> same chip….so while you are more constrained on bus because you are all on
> one chip…your processing power should be better tha
t;>
>> Regards,
>>
>>
>>
>> *Andrew Goodall*****
>>
>> Software Engineer 2 | Development Services | jcpenney . www.jcp.com
>> <http://www.jcp.com/>|
>>
>>
>> *From:* Action Request System discussi
SLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Axton
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2012 9:57 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: fast and list threads - by cores or cpus? - documentation
conflicts.
** Can 2 cores execute 2 threads of execution in parallel? If so, why would
you not want to leverage that capability?
ay, April 02, 2012 9:57 AM
> *To:* arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
> *Subject:* Re: fast and list threads - by cores or cpus? - documentation
> conflicts.
>
> ** **
>
> ** Can 2 cores execute 2 threads of execution in parallel? If so, why
> would you not want to leverage that capabil
t;
>
>
> *Andrew Goodall*
>
> Software Engineer 2 | Development Services | jcpenney . www.jcp.com
> <http://www.jcp.com/>|
> ****
> ----------
>
> *From:* Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:**
> arslist@ARSLIST.O
Hi Andrew,
They have also different information on older documents,
The document "Performance Tuning for Business Service Management" dated
from October 2007 states on page 19:
"If the thread count is set too low, the AR System server will have low CPU
use, poor throughput, and potentially poor
Bingo: so he is about 50 over..
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Tales Parreiras da Silva <
gru...@talesparreiras.com.br> wrote:
> ** Hi Andrew,
>
> They have also different information on older documents,
>
> The document "Performance Tuning for Business Service Management" dated
> from October 2
n Behalf Of patrick zandi
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2012 3:03 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: fast and list threads - by cores or cpus? - documentation
conflicts.
** Bingo: so he is about 50 over..
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Tales Parreiras da Silva
wrote:
** Hi Andrew,
The
http://www.jcp.com/>
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Tales Parreiras da Silva
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2012 2:50 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: fast and list threads - by cores or cpus? - documentation
conflicts.
** Hi An
14 matches
Mail list logo
