Re: [asdf-devel] SBCL port of ECL's extensions

On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 9:30 PM, Robert P. Goldman wrote: > Sounds like there's a good function that can be exposed as an extension > without needing to get the component-gathering right, which would be great. > Indeed, and here I would like to get some help in getting it right. No need for you g

Re: [asdf-devel] SBCL port of ECL's extensions

Now to the point. ASDF right now has two modes of operation. One is "building" the other one is "loading". User defined operations belong to one or another class. * compile-op is clearly a "building" operation, for it takes lisp files and compiles them * load-op is clearly a "loading" operation:

Re: [asdf-devel] SBCL port of ECL's extensions

The idea of shipping an unguaranteed extension is fine with me. Let me just clarify, please: my concern was what seemed like a requirement for getting the component-gathering right. I'd rather not expose that to "outsiders" until we can get it right, and I'm worried, based on my experience

Re: [asdf-devel] SBCL port of ECL's extensions

Hi Robert, I must say that I understand your concerns which are just, right now, *time*. And I also understand that in prolonging this thread I risk you lose your patience with a feeling that I am wasting your time, but please read this email and understand the following key points that indeed wil

Re: [asdf-devel] SBCL port of ECL's extensions

On 3/29/10 Mar 29 -11:05 AM, Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll wrote: > On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 5:47 PM, Robert Goldman > wrote: > > I.e., can you characterize this declaratively in terms of the values of > MODULE-COMPONENTS, and for some operation the values of INPUT-FI

Re: [asdf-devel] SBCL port of ECL's extensions

On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 6:05 PM, Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll < juanjose.garciarip...@googlemail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 5:47 PM, Robert Goldman wrote: > >> I.e., can you characterize this declaratively in terms of the values of >> MODULE-COMPONENTS, and for some operation the values of I

Re: [asdf-devel] SBCL port of ECL's extensions

On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 5:47 PM, Robert Goldman wrote: > I.e., can you characterize this declaratively in terms of the values of > MODULE-COMPONENTS, and for some operation the values of INPUT-FILES > and/or OUTPUT-FILES? > I do not understand your concerns or those in other messages. I do not i

Re: [asdf-devel] SBCL port of ECL's extensions

On 3/29/10 Mar 29 -9:49 AM, Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll wrote: > On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 4:43 PM, Tobias C. Rittweiler > wrote: > > Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll > > writes: > > What is needed for any kind of standalone

Re: [asdf-devel] SBCL port of ECL's extensions

On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 5:37 PM, Robert Goldman wrote: > > Is this an alternative syntax? Do you expect: > > (asdf:oos 'asdf:monolithic-binary-op :my-system :move-here "./") > > to work as well? > No. The operations do not have a notion of "destination", because I did not want to mess up with p

Re: [asdf-devel] SBCL port of ECL's extensions

On 3/29/10 Mar 29 -4:07 AM, Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll wrote: > On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 10:01 AM, Tobias C. Rittweiler > wrote: > > Do people want something like that? Dear, yes! For example, Zach Beane's > buildapp found great resonance: > > http://www.xa

Re: [asdf-devel] SBCL port of ECL's extensions

On 3/27/10 Mar 27 -5:19 PM, Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll wrote: > Now a couple of examples. > > Suppose you have an ASDF system which is made of many sources with > several dependencies. I assume the system does not rely on other > resources (additional files, etc), but this could be extended. > > If

Re: [asdf-devel] SBCL port of ECL's extensions

On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 4:43 PM, Tobias C. Rittweiler wrote: > Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll > writes: > > What is needed for any kind of standalone system building that relies on > > ASDF system definitions and is capable of incorporating all dependencies? > > > > - A way to gather the list of files t

Re: [asdf-devel] SBCL port of ECL's extensions

Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll writes: > On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 10:01 AM, Tobias C. Rittweiler > wrote: > >> Do people want something like that? Dear, yes! For example, Zach Beane's >> buildapp found great resonance: >> >> http://www.xach.com/lisp/buildapp/ >> >> Is your stuff the essentials to

Re: [asdf-devel] SBCL port of ECL's extensions

On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 10:01 AM, Tobias C. Rittweiler wrote: > Do people want something like that? Dear, yes! For example, Zach Beane's > buildapp found great resonance: > > http://www.xach.com/lisp/buildapp/ > > Is your stuff the essentials to have something like that be part of > ASDF? If

Re: [asdf-devel] SBCL port of ECL's extensions

Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll writes: > Now a couple of examples. > > Suppose you have an ASDF system which is made of many sources with several > dependencies. I assume the system does not rely on other resources > (additional files, etc), but this could be extended. > > If you want to build a single F

Re: [asdf-devel] SBCL port of ECL's extensions

Now a couple of examples. Suppose you have an ASDF system which is made of many sources with several dependencies. I assume the system does not rely on other resources (additional files, etc), but this could be extended. If you want to build a single FASL file that contains EVERYTHING, use (asdf

[asdf-devel] SBCL port of ECL's extensions

I just cut & paste what I submitted to the appropriate record in launchpad https://bugs.launchpad.net/asdf/+bug/542583 where the port can be downloaded and given a try. I attach a straightforward port of two operations that ECL supports: - Building a unified FASL file that contains either a sy