Re: Including uiop and not asdf in a built application

2018-01-16 Thread Faré
> :Robert > Am I correct in thinking that Dave's way of building monolithic bundles of > either fasls or source code are, at least potentially, a baby version of > cross-compilation? It seems like these are interesting specifically because > they could be loaded into different images (otherwise, it

Re: Including uiop and not asdf in a built application

2018-01-16 Thread Robert Goldman
On 16 Jan 2018, at 14:17, Faré wrote: :Robert In that case, it seems to me that check-not-old-asdf-system may be simply inappropriate as a check in some (all?) bundle operations. But I would be hard pressed to say when it is and is not appropriate. E.g., presumably it is appropriate in image

Re: Including uiop and not asdf in a built application

2018-01-16 Thread Faré
>>: Dave Cooper >: Robert Goldman Summarizing: * gendl (and gdl with it) uses monolithic-compile-bundle-op, depends-on uiop, not asdf. * gendl tries to use uiop from source to include it without asdf, but asdf 3.3 broke that. My understanding of the reason for this breakage is as follows: * to e

Re: Including uiop and not asdf in a built application

2018-01-15 Thread Robert Goldman
On 12 Jan 2018, at 22:00, Dave Cooper wrote: Hi (I'm not sure who is current lead maintainer, but hopefully the group will have some wisdom), I'm still the lead maintainer for the nonce. I believe Faré would like to see a replacement who is able to give more time and energy to the task. F

Including uiop and not asdf in a built application

2018-01-12 Thread Dave Cooper
Hi (I'm not sure who is current lead maintainer, but hopefully the group will have some wisdom), First of all, Happy New Year and thank you to whomever is monitoring this list. Your efforts are highly appreciated. Our build process for Gendl and GDL for the past several years has involved using