Thanks for that. We don't actually have any unit tests for the new
aspect wizard, so this may not have been working for some time now.
I raised https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=345883 to track this.
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 6:36 AM, Brett Randall javabr...@gmail.com wrote:
I
Hi John,
Basically you are interested in a set() or a get() when it is not
withincode() of a getter or setter (or likely constructor).
The problem is that you can't tie the methods name and the fields name
together, so you either have to specify a completely wild policy:
declare warning: get(*
I'll try to get to it soon. I just find it so much easier to publish
to our springframework repository than the central one.
Andy
On 15 May 2011 17:29, Brett Randall javabr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
1.6.11 was final in March, but I believe that 1.6.10 is the latest
available in Maven Central.
Hi Andy,
One may solve the problem through the introduction of annotations
@Setter and @Getter, which admittedly also makes the code more
expressive.
Regards,
Manuel
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 15:51, Andy Clement andrew.clem...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi John,
Basically you are interested in a set()
Thanks Andy, but I'll look into proxying the springframework repo if
that's recommended, I wasn't aware of it.
Brett
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 12:53 AM, Andy Clement andrew.clem...@gmail.com wrote:
I'll try to get to it soon. I just find it so much easier to publish
to our springframework
Thanks Andrew. Also logged
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=346017 for the
content-assist.
Brett
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 6:17 PM, Andrew Eisenberg and...@eisenberg.as wrote:
Thanks for that. We don't actually have any unit tests for the new
aspect wizard, so this may not have
