Re: [Assam] Letter of Reply from ULFA to Shantikam Hazarika

2007-10-12 Thread ulfa_ 1979April7
Respected assamonliners, We feel you are not coming forth with questions - maybe fearing Parasar,Biswajeet('Rascul ' famed) and such RAW lackies will round you up and disappear you. Upto you. Wish to note a few points: Shati-Kam wrote you all to the right path and the agony of 'dukhuni' As

Re: [Assam] Letter of Reply from ULFA to Shantikam Hazarika

2007-10-11 Thread Chan Mahanta
It doesn't seem to be any different to me. You are consistent . At 10:29 AM -0700 10/11/07, umesh sharma wrote: For a moment I thought it was a letter of demand of ransom or bully money - common ploy used by bullies and mafia to brow beat a vigilant citizen. Not uncommon in u

Re: [Assam] Letter of Reply from ULFA to Shantikam Hazarika

2007-10-11 Thread shantikam hazarika
> umesh sharma wrote:> For a moment I thought it > was a letter of demand of ransom or bully money - common ploy used by > bullies> and mafia to brow beat a vigilant citizen. Not uncommon in urban > Bihar or Mumbai's movie circles either.> > It doesn't seem to be any > different to me.> > Umes

Re: [Assam] Letter of Reply from ULFA to Shantikam Hazarika

2007-10-11 Thread Dilip/Dil Deka
I have a comment on the genuineness of the ULFA letter. Supposedly the letter is written and signed by Rubi (with an i) Bhuyan. Note how the writer's name is spelt as "Ruby" (with a y) in the first paragraph of the letter. Are Ruby and Rubi the same person? Rubi, the author of the letter does no

Re: [Assam] Letter of Reply from ULFA to Shantikam Hazarika

2007-10-11 Thread umesh sharma
For a moment I thought it was a letter of demand of ransom or bully money - common ploy used by bullies and mafia to brow beat a vigilant citizen. Not uncommon in urban Bihar or Mumbai's movie circles either. It doesn't seem to be any different to me. Umesh Chan Mahanta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro