Re: Sysadata symbol and literal cross reference record type x’44’ re-post from IBMMAIN

2019-05-16 Thread Farley, Peter x23353
<*Doh!*> Sorry, never mind. I see other entries in the thread in this forum. Apologies. Peter -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List [mailto:ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU] On Behalf Of Farley, Peter x23353 Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2019 10:23 AM To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSE

Re: Sysadata symbol and literal cross reference record type x’44’ re-post from IBMMAIN

2019-05-16 Thread Gary Weinhold
Unless you can ensure all executions will also be under those conditions, you will also need to exercise all possible code paths in the program with every possible variation of input(s). On 2019-05-15 5:57 p.m., Paul Gilmartin wrote: More practical, mark your module REFR and run with REFRPROT

Re: Sysadata symbol and literal cross reference record type x’44’ re-post from IBMMAIN

2019-05-16 Thread Farley, Peter x23353
PMFJI here, but can you tell us where the rest of this conversation may be located? I found only one message on IBM-MAIN with this subject, from April 22, author Joe Reichmann. I would be interested to read the whole thread if I could find it. Peter -Original Message- From: IBM Mainf

Re: Sysadata symbol and literal cross reference record type x’44’ re-post from IBMMAIN

2019-05-16 Thread Mike Hochee
Hi Martin, No, I cannot elaborate as I have no additional information, just a presumption. Thank you for the E163 reference. Mike From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List on behalf of Martin Truebner Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2019 2:22 AM To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSER