רָאֵ֔ל לֹ֥א יְשַׁקֵּ֖ר
From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List on behalf
of Paul Gilmartin <0014e0e4a59b-dmarc-requ...@listserv.uga.edu>
Sent: Sunday, May 5, 2024 10:44 AM
To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
Subject: Re: SV: ASMA043E Previously defined
On 5/4/24 22:36:27, Ed Jaffe wrote:
...
But we had a register equates macro that came to conflict with
IATYREGS when we added JES3 support. Many JES3 headers used
IATYREGS conditioned on setting ofa GBLB.
All of the IATY macros have similar conditioning, thus allowing duplicate
On 5/1/2024 9:58 AM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
The desire to accept redefinition with identical value appears
to arise from undisciplined design and use of header files.
But we had a register equates macro that came to conflict with
IATYREGS when we added JES3 support. Many JES3 headers used
On 5/1/24 09:53:45, Willy Jensen wrote:
REXX is fine with the same label occurring multiple times, it just picks the
first.
.
That's bad.
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Charles Mills
Sendt: 1. maj 2024 17:47
I don't think that anyone has mentioned this point but I think that all
REXX is fine with the same label occurring multiple times, it just picks the
first.
Sample:
exit sub1()
Sub1: say 'first one';return 0
Sub1: say 'second one';return 0
Running the sample get message 'first one'
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: IBM Mainframe Assembler List
