>1.3.5 and 2.0.x:
These two version a totaly different in attachment handling - do you have
realy checked this with 2.0.0 ?
Thomas
Trevor Jacques <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gesendet von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
07.08.2008 21:27
Bitte antworten an
ASSP development mailing list
An
assp development ma
On 07/08/2008, at 4:45 PM, _larsneo_ wrote:
talking about the dnsbl default settings i'd recommend to remove
blackholes.five-ten-sg.com from the defaults due to it's accurancy -
see
http://www.dnsbl.com/2007/10/fiveten-blacklist-not-accurate.html
Yes, I can't send email to Thomas Eckard b
>There are no separate apps and cron jobs necessary anymore.
:-)
T.
-
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
- rebuildspamdb.pl and move2num.pl are now integrated into assp.pl
There are no separate apps and cron jobs necessary anymore.
-
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest
>No one knows what these options do?
They do the same as in 20 other features. It is standard in ASSP to
have this options.
block = block the mail
monitor = show the event, do not block
score = add the scoring value of this event in penaltybox to the total
score of message and/or IP, do not block
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/05/08 01:52 pm, James Moe wrote:
> Hello,
> Besides "Disable" the function of the other options for "Backscatter
> Detection (FBMTV)" are not obvious.
> What do "block," "monitor" and "score" do?
>
No one knows what these options do?
- --
1.3.5 and 2.0.x:
A user contacted me that he had had a problem getting a pdf into
another user. The bounce cites that assp had blocked an executable,
but there was no executable attached to the e-mail, it was a pdf file.
On further inspection, and file renaming, we found the problem. The
origi
Thomas,
for testing purposes MaxBytes and ClamAVBytes are set to 1.000.000
I checked 9460.eml (321 kB) for the other attachment without success, but
the message was delivered including the 'test.xxx' if sent in HTML. Where is
the test.xxx? The embedded .png in my signature wasn´t listed in that .
>> I see actual (1.3.9.1) dnsbl defaults include UCEPROTECT
>>
>> I think it's not a good idea because on their site they ask NOT to use
dns
>> query but rsync for servers with more than 1000 queries per day (
>> http://www.uceprotect.net/en/index.php?m=6&s=11 ) or at least a note
could
>> be adde
No, 'send250OK' is not set. Otherwise there wouldn´t be the correct 554
error message as below.
Regards
Michel
_
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Thomas
Eckardt/eck
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 7. August 2008 18:40
An: ASSP development mailing list
Betreff: [As
>The transmission is still in progress when ASSP/Postfix suddenly drops
the connection.
I think ASSP drops the connection!
But this could only be the case if 'send250OK' (in any case) is set to on
or it is an outgoing mail and 'send250OKISP' is set to on.
The '250 OK' will never be logged by ASS
Michel,
If the header + body + the first attachment is larger than
MaxBytes/ClamAVBytes a second (or more) attachment will not be detected!
Just look in to the file ./notspam/9460.eml - is there any other
attachment than the winmail.dat to see? I think it's not. Only the parts
that are written
Thomas,
.dat is allowed, .xxx is not.
I tried to send the same message (with the attached, not allowed 'test.xxx')
twice via an external account to an inbound account:
first in HTML :
Aug-7-08 18:02:06 Connected: 212.227.126.188:50430 -> xx.xx.xx:25 ->
127.0.0.1:24
Aug-7-08 18:02:06 [EMAIL P
No, send250OKISP is not set. As you can see here:
"07.08.2008 15:36:52 Action: Message Delivery Attempt Failed Client:
196.0.0.161 From:
To: Subject: WG: Morgenmuffel... SMTP ID: M2008080711282022438
Connection ID: 34449 Last Command: DATA Last Response: 354 End data with
.
The transmi
It looks like you've set 'send250OKISP' to on - is this true?
Thomas
"Michel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gesendet von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
07.08.2008 17:18
Bitte antworten an
ASSP development mailing list
An
"'ASSP development mailing list'"
Kopie
Thema
Re: [Assp-test] Antwort: Re: ASSP 1.4.1 go
>In addition to that I found, HTML-Mails (winmail.dat included) with not
allowed attachments (in this case 'test.xxx') are not blocked.
Are .dat files not allowed in Level 4 ?
Because "info: attachment 'winmail.dat' found for Level-4" shows that the
engine has found it !?
Thomas
"Michel"
Replylogging was already turned on. Further testing shows that this
behaviour only comes up when mails are sended from inbound (exchange) to
outbound (ASSP with postfix). In this case the connection is just dropped.
That´s the reason for the missing SMTP error although 'replyLogging' is on.
All oth
please switch on 'replyLogging' and try again!
I've just made a test for outgoing mail with blocked attachment. I've got
the attachment error back from my mail gateway!
Aug-7-08 16:09:46 [Worker_5] Connected: :42968 -> :625 -> :25
Aug-7-08 16:09:46 M1-18186-04936 [Worker_5] <..
ASSP development mailing list
schreibt:
>But the sender does not get a non-delivery report.
ASSP never sends a NDR. It replies with the message you set in
AttachmentError.
To see what is going on set the logging option: SMTP Status Code Reply
Logging (replyLogging).
---
Hello @all!
Unfortunately maybe I found a misbehaviour handling blocked attachments:
Blocked or not allowed attachments are found and CC as wanted to my Spambox.
But the sender does not get a non-delivery report.
The postfix log on my ASSP machine says that the connection is lost:
"postfix/smt
Matti Haack wrote:
> Try to add these additonal repositories to ppm
> (Edit/Preferences/repositories):[...]
see also http://www.asspsmtp.org/wiki/Perl_Modules#Windows - missed the
'University of Winnipeg' repository also and found out that 'rtfm' is
sometimes not *that* bad...
regards from germ
On 8/6/2008, marrco ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I see actual (1.3.9.1) dnsbl defaults include UCEPROTECT
>
> I think it's not a good idea because on their site they ask NOT to use dns
> query but rsync for servers with more than 1000 queries per day (
> http://www.uceprotect.net/en/index.php?m=6&
>blackholes.five-ten-sg.com
is quite successful if you use RBLmaxhits=2.
With RBLmaxhits=1 it is not recommended.
-
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based
> my defaults are:
>
> zen.spamhaus.org
> bl.spamcop.net
> dul.dnsbl.sorbs.net
> combined.njabl.org
>
> with RBLmaxits set to 1
I think you may add
ix.dnsbl.manitu.net
bhnc.njabl.org
the second one won't add so much, but having it won't hurt; the first
one
(manitu) is often useful, especially fo
> Try to add these additonal repositories to ppm
> (Edit/Preferences/repositories):
> http://trouchelle.com/ppm/package.xml
> and
> http://theory5.uwinnipeg.ca/ppms/package.lst
That did the trick; as a note the trouchelle repo
also allowed me to install the latest Mail::SPF
and enable SPF 2 chec
I just installed it with active perl on my windows server.
Try to add these additonal repositories to ppm
(Edit/Preferences/repositories):
http://trouchelle.com/ppm/package.xml
and
http://theory5.uwinnipeg.ca/ppms/package.lst
Matti
>> What you need to install is 'Email::MIME::Modifier'. I thin
26 matches
Mail list logo
