ASSP development mailing list
schreibt:
>Is 1.5.1.3 good to run in the wild on a live server? I am happy to
>give it a shot, but if there are any known issues, I may want to
>avoid
>them.
Meanwhile 1.5.1.4 is published.
1.5.1.5 is the current development version.
http://www.magicvillage.d
On Jul 3, 2009, at 9:59 PM, Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
> ASSP development mailing list
> schreibt:
>> Assp.pl version 1.5.1.2
>
> I think that was improved in 1.5.1.3.
Mac OS X 10.5.7
$perl -v
This is perl, v5.8.9 built for darwin-2level
1.5.1.2 does not run, here is the start erro
On Jul 3, 2009, at 9:59 PM, Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
> ASSP development mailing list
> schreibt:
>> Assp.pl version 1.5.1.2
>
> I think that was improved in 1.5.1.3.
Trying with 1.5.1.3 now:
Global symbol "$globalRegisterURL" requires explicit package name at
assp.pl line 22782.
Global symbol "
On Jul 3, 2009, at 9:59 PM, Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
> ASSP development mailing list
> schreibt:
>> Assp.pl version 1.5.1.2
>
> I think that was improved in 1.5.1.3.
Is 1.5.1.3 good to run in the wild on a live server? I am happy to
give it a shot, but if there are any known issues, I may want
ASSP development mailing list
schreibt:
>Assp.pl version 1.5.1.2
I think that was improved in 1.5.1.3.
--
___
Assp-test mailing list
Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
https://
The same issue below, apples to the IPv6 module as well:
Jul-3-09 16:58:14 Assp.pl version 1.5.1.2(0.0.03) (Perl 5.008009)
initializing
Jul-3-09 16:58:14 IPv6 support not available
By enabling the IPv6 setting in the admin, after a restart:
enableINET6:=1
Jul-3-09 16:59:03 IO::Socket::INET6 modu
Jul-3-09 16:50:51 Assp.pl version 1.5.1.2(0.0.03) (Perl 5.008009)
initializing
Jul-3-09 16:48:41 IO::Socket::SSL module not installed - secure SSL
sockets not available
As far as I know, I do have that module installed:
perl -MIO::Socket::INET6 -e 1
Returns no errors
If I chan
GrayHat wrote:
>Thomas, as you know I've tried using v2 from time to time and
>each time I had to rollback to 1.x since 2.x bombed on my test
>system; the problem is probably due to memory constraint on
>the test system, at any rate, I'll give v2 a spin next week to see
>what comes out and will rep
> I want to open a short discussion with the question:
> 'Is ASSP V2 in a stabil state, so it could be published on SF?'
Thomas, as you know I've tried using v2 from time to time and
each time I had to rollback to 1.x since 2.x bombed on my test
system; the problem is probably due to memory cons
I have still some stability issues on windows.
I will send you more information during the weekend.
Matti
TEe> Hi all,
TEe> I want to open a short discussion with the question:
TEe> 'Is ASSP V2 in a stabil state, so it could be published on SF?'
TEe> Any comment are welcome!
TEe> Thomas
T
Hi all,
I want to open a short discussion with the question:
'Is ASSP V2 in a stabil state, so it could be published on SF?'
Any comment are welcome!
Thomas
DISCLAIMER:
***
This email and any files transmitted with it may be confidential, l
>is there any roadmap for ASSP 2
What do you expect to read there?
>or a release date for a stable version
V2 is as stabil as it could be at the moment. I think in 99% of all cases
it will run perfect. But we have 897 configurable values - and YES, it is
possible to configure it in a way that
fixed:
- High CPU usage and stucking workers if
'DoBackSctr','BackDNSInterval','downloadBackDNSFile','localBackDNSFile'
and 'useDB4IntCache' are configured - caused by too less BerkeleyDB cache.
The used BerkeleyDB cache is set to at least 50MB in this case - if the
configured value is too le
Hi,
is there any roadmap for ASSP 2 or a release date for a stable version ?
Thanks
--
___
Assp-test mailing list
Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/l
Just my opinion, it does not make sense to use EmailAdminReportsTo in case
RebuildNotify is empty. For my part I only want to receive internal
warning/info messages but not this report. It is unlucky to combine this.
tk
--
15 matches
Mail list logo
