GrayHat wrote:
>Thomas, as you know I've tried using v2 from time to time and
>each time I had to rollback to 1.x since 2.x bombed on my test
>system; the problem is probably due to memory constraint on
>the test system, at any rate, I'll give v2 a spin next week to see
>what comes out and will report about my findings

I have not tried V2 yet.  But I have been watching most of the posts regarding 
it.  Along that line, I think that when it is decided it is safe to put on SF, 
a set of machine requirements (in bold) should be defined for those who want to 
try it out (so as to not have people trying it out and then coming back crying 
because it doesn't work for them).  It will only make things that much better 
(survivability wise) for ASSPS v2.  Good words spread around fast, but bad ones 
spread faster (or something like that)!

::steps down from soapbox

Kind Regards,

Brett



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Assp-test mailing list
Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test

Reply via email to