It can be some sort of incompatibility in:
1. Windows Server 2008 x64.
2. Perl 5.10 x64
3. Win32::Daemon
Has anyone x64 testing environment to check this?
I've tried starting assp on 4 of my test servers (i32 architecture) and found
no problem.
Clean install perl, mod_install, service install,
Services timeout is controlled by:
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control – here, add
ServicesPipeTimeout (DWORD) and add in timeout period in milliseconds.
Fritz:
Maybe this will be of help (if it’s not already doing it):
Don't have a forum logon and can't read the post without one
seemingly, but I suspect I'm seeing something similar.
read it here
http://sourceforge.net/apps/phpbb/assp/viewtopic.php?f=9t=368
if you use http in place of https you'll be able to read the thread (but
not to post, not being logged
Services timeout is controlled by:
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control
– here, add ServicesPipeTimeout (DWORD) and add in timeout period in
milliseconds.
hmm warning, changing the value may cause some side effects since it
acts on ALL the services and changing it may cause
ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
schreibt:
If you want
ASSP to delete files based on their age instead of their quantity (
MaxFiles ), setup MaxBayesFileAge to your needs.
This is not correct.
Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
If you want
ASSP to delete files based on their age instead of their quantity (
MaxFiles ), setup MaxBayesFileAge to your needs.
This is not correct.
Ok, then replace quantity with number. It's the same thing.
I got this from version 1.5.1.7(0.1.08). If you've
2009/9/11 GrayHat gray...@gmx.net
if you need a quick
solution then
just setup the ASSP service startup to manual next, open the task
scheduler
and create a new scheduled job, set the cmd to net start asspsmtp and
schedule it to run at system startup, at that point the system will
boot and
Ah, right, thanks for the nudge.
SO questions on this concept, again considering that we're using
subjectasmaillognames.
1) Wouldn't it be better to first remove files with the exact same subject
instead of just their age, say leaving 2 or 3 for variance, but if there's
10 of the same, delete
There are unlimited ways of doing the reducing. I cannot see an
advantage (or disadvantage) in the way you do it.
V1 has an additional age (default=1000 days) for reports. May be,
Thomas should add that to V2 too.
--
ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
schreibt:
Fritz,
I don't think the issue is HOW it's done. The issue (imho) is the
wording in the descriptions, which can be confusing.
I was answering to a proposal to do it differently from
nntp.p...@gmail.com
ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
schreibt:
For example, in v2, it states that you shouldn't delete files using
age, even though that's the only way to do it if you use filenames and
also don't use move2num.
It does not state this. It states that you should you not
ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
schreibt:
However, in discussions with Thomas, it seems that you can use MaxAge
with Bayesian, subjectfilenames enabled and move2num disabled. Is this
statement correct?
You can, but it would be not recommended. The standard way works
ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
schreibt:
The last sentence indicates to me that the number of files will only
be
pruned base on the age limit set by MaxBayesFileAge and that it won't
delete the oldest files until the number of files per folder reaches
MaxFiles. Yes?
Opps, I think I've missed something...
the standard way... What standard way? If subjectfilenames is set to
enabled, and move2num is disabled, what other way is there to make
sure maxfiles is never exceded?
Cheers
Steve
Sent from my iPhone
On 11.09.2009, at 23:08, Fritz Borgstedt
ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
schreibt:
the standard way... What standard way? If subjectfilenames is set to
enabled, and move2num is disabled, what other way is there to make
sure maxfiles is never exceded?
If MaintBayesCollection is set, the default way (standard
15 matches
Mail list logo
