Re: [Assp-test] (denySMTPConnectionsFromAlways)

2009-10-27 Thread GrayHat
> Would it not be the responsibility of the sending mail server to > inform the sending user that the message could not be delivered? Yes, and in that particular case (denyalways) it makes sense to just drop the connection; think at it just like "null routing" the connecting IP; if an IP is into t

Re: [Assp-test] (denySMTPConnectionsFromAlways)

2009-10-27 Thread Alex Frunza
Write on! It's like blocking some IP's at the router, in fact I'm not sure ASSP will even present the banner, I haven't tested it. But denySMTPconnectionsFrom might give such a response? It should start a bit later than denySMTPconnectionsFromAlways. Anyone tested? On 10/27/2009 10:43 AM, GrayH

Re: [Assp-test] 1.6.0(0.3.04) Score Total

2009-10-27 Thread Hill, Brett
Hill, Brett wrote: > The X-ASSP-SCORE (whatever it was called) no longer appears > in the header. I think the last time it did was before 1.6.0(0.2.00). This continues to be a problem in version 1.6.0(0.3.15). I saw it show X-ASSP-Message-Totalscore in one message (I don't recall what it's de

[Assp-test] ASSP Block Report 1.6.0(0.3.15)

2009-10-27 Thread Hill, Brett
This is what I got this morning after it ran: -- mydomain.com --- no blocked email found for domain mydomain.com in the last 1 day(s) 2604 lines with 471.5kB analysed in 1 logfile(s) on host ASSP.nospam in 0 seconds Everythin

[Assp-test] ASSP 1.6 4.00

2009-10-27 Thread Hilário Fochi Silveira
Line 237 is duplicated in line 238 ['SpamError','Spam Error',80,\&textinput,'554 5.7.1 Mail (SESSIONID) appears to be unsolicited - REASON - send error reports to postmas...@localdomain','([25]\d\d .*)',undef,'SMTP error message to reject spam. The literal LOCALDOMAIN will be replaced by the

Re: [Assp-test] Antwort: Re: fixes in 2.0.1_RC0.5.07

2009-10-27 Thread K Post
Block reporting is still giving no results. On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 8:40 AM, K Post wrote: > I thought you were talking about it extending too far to the right, > not too far off of the bottom of the screen. > > What about showing the lines in reverse order, newest on the top? > > On Tue, Oct 2

Re: [Assp-test] Antwort: Re: fixes in 2.0.1_RC0.5.07

2009-10-27 Thread K Post
I thought you were talking about it extending too far to the right, not too far off of the bottom of the screen. What about showing the lines in reverse order, newest on the top? On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 2:32 AM, Thomas Eckardt/eck wrote: >>BUT it's showing too many lines and the last 3-4 aren't

[Assp-test] ASSP 1.6 3.15 & 4.00 crashed.

2009-10-27 Thread Hilário Fochi Silveira
ASSP crashed twice today It appears to be caused by a particular whitelisted newsletter mail that should be able to go trough normally. I always suspect of errors made by myself and I have hundreds of bomb regex in each file that could be the reason for this failure. 1) Is there a way to tell a

Re: [Assp-test] ASSP Block Report 1.6.0(0.3.15)

2009-10-27 Thread Fritz Borgstedt
ASSP development mailing list schreibt: > It should have found something. It will, if you run 1.6.0 (0.4.00) -- Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need t

Re: [Assp-test] 1.6.0(0.3.04) Score Total

2009-10-27 Thread Fritz Borgstedt
ASSP development mailing list schreibt: >This continues to be a problem in version 1.6.0(0.3.15). > >I saw it show X-ASSP-Message-Totalscore in one message It only shows up, when the Spam was detected using scoring. -

Re: [Assp-test] 1.6.0(0.3.04) Score Total

2009-10-27 Thread Hill, Brett
Fritz Borgstedt wrote: > ASSP development mailing list > schreibt: > >This continues to be a problem in version 1.6.0(0.3.15). > > > >I saw it show X-ASSP-Message-Totalscore in one message > > It only shows up, when the Spam was detected using scoring. In the past, it showed up if the score wa

Re: [Assp-test] ASSP Block Report 1.6.0(0.3.15)

2009-10-27 Thread K Post
Just a note, with 2.0.1 rc 0.5.07, which was supposed to fix this problem that was introduced with 0.5.05/6, I'm still getting nothing found... On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 8:28 AM, Fritz Borgstedt wrote: > ASSP development mailing list > schreibt: >> It should have found something. > > It will, if y

[Assp-test] Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: fixes in 2.0.1_RC0.5.07

2009-10-27 Thread Thomas Eckardt/eck
for me it works perfect! Thomas K Post 27.10.2009 13:41 Bitte antworten an ASSP development mailing list An ASSP development mailing list Kopie Thema Re: [Assp-test] Antwort: Re: fixes in 2.0.1_RC0.5.07 Block reporting is still giving no results. On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 8:40 AM,

[Assp-test] 1.6.0(0.4.02) Search/Update/Refresh Buttons Top and Bottom

2009-10-27 Thread Hill, Brett
FYI, in Firefox, these buttons only work the first time you use them. After that you have to use the browser refresh button or the F5 key. With Internet Explorer 8, both buttons appear to update the log window. However, the bottom "refresh/update browser" button sends you to the top of the log pa

Re: [Assp-test] Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: fixes in 2.0.1_RC0.5.07

2009-10-27 Thread K Post
I'm happy that it's fixed for you, but it definitely isn't working for me on win32. It was fine until I started using 2.0.1 rc 0.5.05/6 and still doesn't work with 07. Did something change between 04 and 05/6 with respect to logging or the way that logs are parsed for block reports and grip list

Re: [Assp-test] 1.6.0(0.4.02) Search/Updat e/Refresh Buttons Top and Bottom

2009-10-27 Thread Fritz Borgstedt
ASSP development mailing list schreibt: >the bottom "refresh/update browser" button sends you to the top >of the log page after being pressed. how is Jump to the End of the Maillog (MaillogTailJump) set? -- Come build

[Assp-test] Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: fixes in 2.0.1_RC0.5.07

2009-10-27 Thread Thomas Eckardt/eck
OK try 5.08 at cvs! Thomas K Post 27.10.2009 21:21 Bitte antworten an ASSP development mailing list An ASSP development mailing list Kopie Thema Re: [Assp-test] Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: fixes in 2.0.1_RC0.5.07 I'm happy that it's fixed for you, but it definitely isn't working for

Re: [Assp-test] ASSP 1.6 3.15 & 4.00 crashed.

2009-10-27 Thread James Brown
On 28/10/2009, at 12:24 AM, Hilário Fochi Silveira wrote: > ASSP crashed twice today > > It appears to be caused by a particular > whitelisted newsletter mail that should be able to go trough normally. > I always suspect of errors made by myself and I > have hundreds of bomb regex in each file th

Re: [Assp-test] Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: fixes in 2.0.1_RC0.5.07

2009-10-27 Thread K Post
5.08 fixed the block reporting for me. Thanks so much. What was it? In the maillog, entering a search term and hitting enter on the keyboard now starts auto instead of seraching. This wasn't the case previously. Also, I see that wrapping is now off for auto. Did you give any thought to turnin

Re: [Assp-test] Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: fixes in 2.0.1_RC0.5.07

2009-10-27 Thread K Post
Did anything change with searching logs. I'm seeing 99% processor usage while searching all of a sudden On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 11:01 PM, K Post wrote: > 5.08 fixed the block reporting for me.  Thanks so much.  What was it? > > In the maillog, entering a search term and hitting enter on the > ke

Re: [Assp-test] Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: fixes in 2.0.1_RC0.5.07

2009-10-27 Thread K Post
Now I am seeing wrapping in auto (but i didn't change the setting in the log). Looks good, but apparently inconsistent. I'll report back if I can find when it watches what i have set and when it doesn't On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 11:05 PM, K Post wrote: > Did anything change with searching logs.  

Re: [Assp-test] Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: fixes in 2.0.1_RC0.5.07

2009-10-27 Thread K Post
It looks like with 5.07 that whitelisted addresses aren't being allowed through when they appear only in the envelope again. Can't tell if this was fixed in 5.05 or not. On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 11:15 PM, K Post wrote: > Now I am seeing wrapping in auto (but i didn't change the setting in > the