Ken,
I think you missed a vital point, WE ARE the testers...
Thomas and Fritz are the programmers... They can't be expected to
test ASSP in every conceivable configuration... That's what we're here
for...
We're also here to provide feedback and suggestions... Most are
accepted, some are r
Hello Andrew,
I watched the thread you are speaking about unfold. I wanted to
comment here and say that you have hit the nail on the head, in my
opinion, as to what the issues are.
If I recall correctly, you found a bug, but had to work very hard to
prove you did, and had you not had some p
These are excellent points, and play a much larger role, in my
opinion, to the problem of lack of updates by users/testers than auto
update does. Well said.
--
Scott * If you contact me off list replace talklists@ with scott@ *
On Nov 25, 2009, at 5:43 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 11/25/2
On Nov 26, 2009, at 5:41 AM, K Post wrote:
> I'm all for sending out notices of minor and critical updates, maybe
> even annoying the admins with a popup every time there's a new
> version, but autoupdates are a bad idea for a system as critical as an
> antispam server.
I agree. But why not foll
On Nov 26, 2009, at 6:06 AM, GrayHat wrote:
> Well... let's say that the "automatic" update may (for ONE time)
> follow
> the same approach which Microsoft (ok... now people will run against
> me with guns ) took, that is, offering multiple choices, that is
>
> manual, notify only
>
> download+n
On Nov 26, 2009, at 8:42 AM, GrayHat wrote:
> Yeah, I think it may be reasonable; and a good default
> may be "download, don't install, notify" (with notification
> repeated at every "rebuildspamdb" btw - so lazy-assed
> admins won't forget about it :D)
Hello GreyHat,
If it must have auto update,
On Nov 27, 2009, at 6:09 PM, K Post wrote:
> The MS approach definitely works, In theory at least, their updates
> are (also theoretically) tested by a whole team of people before they
> go out and on all sorts of configurations and hardware. ASSP would
> only have Thomas and maybe Fritz to test
No guns here, I only use swords. Micro$oft = evil. Oh wait, I'm
running win32 system. Never mind. :)
Seriously though, I'm all for discussion and won't ever take
offense... I'd rather see Thomas only implement a simple nag screen
than waste his time coding all of these options.
The MS approac
The best would be, you extract the HTML-source -> zip -> send. This will
make it much more easy to find the reason for that
Thomas
K Post
26.11.2009 15:05
Bitte antworten an
ASSP development mailing list
An
ASSP development mailing list
Kopie
Thema
Re: [Assp-test] Antwort: very minor:
Yes, using a single character to search for, making problems if it is
found in file name. Any other combination with more than one character
does not make problem, even if it is found in a filename.
How ever, if you find some problems there - post them here or directly to
me.
Thomas
K Pos
ASSP 1.6.1.3(0.0.11)
A spam seems to cause a loop, ASSP stops answering to the admin
interface. After a few minutes it restarts.
It happens once or twice per week. But today it already happened twice.
In both instances ASSP was processing the same spam.
It may also be related to bombs. But I do
11 matches
Mail list logo
