So, the 99 users who believe that the message is black should each add
a rule (in the case of outlook/exchange) or add to personal BL because
of 1 minority guy who believes it should be white? (And in the case of
multiple recepients, this 1 guy wouldn't get it anyway)
Sorry, but it reminds m
Thanks to everyone for helping me out!
Now I know what was wrong.. stupid me had set a very high limit to
URIBLMaxTime.
I can't remember how that happened or why I did that as I have only 3
uribl providers in use anyway.
After changing the value to default settings of 10 seconds, "worker
stuck
My fault. Sorry.
Paul K. Dickson
Systems Administrator
Interagency Information Technologies
Frederick County Government
Frederick, MD 21701
pdick...@frederickcountymd.gov
301-600-2399/x12399
> From: Fritz Borgstedt
> Reply-To: ASSP development mailing list
> Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 22:10:42
Version text on website (both Fritz's and Sourceforge's) says (0.0.05)
is the latest, but only see (0.0.03).
Kind Regards,
Brett
_| _| _| Brett Hill, MCSE, CEH, CCA
_| _| _| Systems Administrator
_| _| _| NLB Corp.
_| _| _| 29830 Beck Road
_| _| _| Wi
On 2010-05-04 5:28 AM, Thomas Eckardt wrote:
>> But, if adding this feature has a major impact on performance,
> There is no major impact on performance!
Well, then its all good! :)
--
Best regards,
Charles
--
__
The Whitelist has nothing directly to do with the corpus (Bayes). The
Whitelist is only manipulated by sending mails to the addresses defined in
EmailWhitelistAdd
EmailWhitelistRemove
>let's say 100 users decided
that a given email is JUNK and ONE decided it's fine
let's say better - one decid
>> someone doesn't want to receive some messages (s)he may just add
>> a given sender to his/her personal BL (which will probably be
>> smaller)
> But this (personal blacklist) is provided by every mail client - or
> not?
That's different; if you do it at client level then you'll have to
accept t
>someone doesn't want to receive some messages (s)he may just add
>a given sender to his/her personal BL (which will probably be smaller)
But this (personal blacklist) is provided by every mail client - or not?
Thomas
Von:"GrayHat"
An: "ASSP development mailing list"
Datum: 03.05.20
>But, if adding this feature has a major impact on performance,
There is no major impact on performance!
Thomas
Von:Charles Marcus
An: assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
Datum: 03.05.2010 17:00
Betreff:Re: [Assp-test] test for personal whitelist wanted
On 2010-05-03 10:43 AM
>Is the mail passed
No, a mail is only consider whitelisted, if all recipient are whitelisting
the sender.
Thomas
Von:Маллиндайн Стивен (Steve Mallindine)
An: ASSP development mailing list
Datum: 03.05.2010 18:21
Betreff:Re: [Assp-test] test for personal whitelist wanted
I think the following link
http://www.jcb-sc.com/hostile/
contains some quite interesting considerations; in
particular
http://www.jcb-sc.com/hostile/helopipe.html
http://www.jcb-sc.com/hostile/cacheboom.html
now, I really wonder how ASSP may deal with an HELO
string like the one shown at the
11 matches
Mail list logo
