OH! So with MaxBayesFileAge set to zero, move2numb off, and subject logging
on, it'll pair down, removing oldest first?
The admin says:
This option is usefull, if UseSubjectsAsMaillogNames is set to on and
doMove2Num is set to off, because in this case the number of files in every
collection
ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
schreibt:
If you want
ASSP to delete files based on their age instead of their quantity (
MaxFiles ), setup MaxBayesFileAge to your needs.
This is not correct.
Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
If you want
ASSP to delete files based on their age instead of their quantity (
MaxFiles ), setup MaxBayesFileAge to your needs.
This is not correct.
Ok, then replace quantity with number. It's the same thing.
I got this from version 1.5.1.7(0.1.08). If you've
Ah, right, thanks for the nudge.
SO questions on this concept, again considering that we're using
subjectasmaillognames.
1) Wouldn't it be better to first remove files with the exact same subject
instead of just their age, say leaving 2 or 3 for variance, but if there's
10 of the same, delete
There are unlimited ways of doing the reducing. I cannot see an
advantage (or disadvantage) in the way you do it.
V1 has an additional age (default=1000 days) for reports. May be,
Thomas should add that to V2 too.
--
ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
schreibt:
Fritz,
I don't think the issue is HOW it's done. The issue (imho) is the
wording in the descriptions, which can be confusing.
I was answering to a proposal to do it differently from
nntp.p...@gmail.com
ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
schreibt:
For example, in v2, it states that you shouldn't delete files using
age, even though that's the only way to do it if you use filenames and
also don't use move2num.
It does not state this. It states that you should you not
ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
schreibt:
However, in discussions with Thomas, it seems that you can use MaxAge
with Bayesian, subjectfilenames enabled and move2num disabled. Is this
statement correct?
You can, but it would be not recommended. The standard way works
ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
schreibt:
The last sentence indicates to me that the number of files will only
be
pruned base on the age limit set by MaxBayesFileAge and that it won't
delete the oldest files until the number of files per folder reaches
MaxFiles. Yes?
Opps, I think I've missed something...
the standard way... What standard way? If subjectfilenames is set to
enabled, and move2num is disabled, what other way is there to make
sure maxfiles is never exceded?
Cheers
Steve
Sent from my iPhone
On 11.09.2009, at 23:08, Fritz Borgstedt
ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
schreibt:
the standard way... What standard way? If subjectfilenames is set to
enabled, and move2num is disabled, what other way is there to make
sure maxfiles is never exceded?
If MaintBayesCollection is set, the default way (standard
We use file name logging because on occasion I'm forced to go through the
logs and report back to my supervisor any emails that I find to be
misclassified. It's a huge waste of time I know - it is what it is.
Because of this need, we can't use move2num, so the collection quickly grows
beyond the
You're kidding!!! That's great news.
I've read the options in the rebuildspamdb section several times over the
years, but I don't see anything on housekeeping even in this new (to me)
v2. I must be going dumb - can you kindly nudge me in the right direction?
What text should I search for to
ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
schreibt:
can you kindly nudge me in the right direction?
MaintBayesCollection : Maintenance for Bayesian Collection
Set this to on, if you want ASSP to run a maintenance tasks on the
bayesian collection folders ( spamlog , notspamlog
14 matches
Mail list logo
