Re: [Assp-user] bug: problem going from non-config rendered page to config men

Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy schreibt: >If you could explain it or suggest an URL for where to learn about >it, I >would appreciate it. Thanks! Look into the forum and ask there. - Take S

Re: [Assp-user] bug: problem going from non-config rendered page to config men

Fritz Borgstedt wrote: > e.g. > "In order to ensure secure remote access to ASSP admin area, we've > configured Apache to provide reverse proxy from /assp to > http://localhost:5 " Hmm. I guess I don't know enough about Apache to understand why an URL to /#name would be an issue. If ASSP op

Re: [Assp-user] bug: problem going from non-config r endered page to config men

Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy schreibt: > >I'm guessing no, since I'm not sure what you mean. Could you give >me >an example so I can make sure I am testing as thoroughly as possible? e.g. "In order to ensure secure remote access to ASSP admin area, we've config

Re: [Assp-user] bug: problem going from non-config rendered page to config men

Fritz Borgstedt wrote: > Under these circumstances may be, but when somebody run the > webinterface as relative to the ASSP-Folder, did you test that? I'm guessing no, since I'm not sure what you mean. Could you give me an example so I can make sure I am testing as thoroughly as possible? Also

Re: [Assp-user] bug: problem going from non-config rendered page to config men

Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy schreibt: >It tested fine in FireFox (1.5) and IE (6). I don't see the >difference between using "/" and "./" under these circumstances - >other than an extra character that is not necessary. Under these circumstances may be, but when

Re: [Assp-user] bug: problem going from non-config rendered page to config men

Fritz Borgstedt wrote: It renders the url to absolut. It is fixed in 21 (i think) with use of "./" It tested fine in FireFox (1.5) and IE (6).  I don't see the difference between using "/" and "./" under these circumstances - other than an extra character that is not necessary. -

Re: [Assp-user] invalid user, mail rejected.

On 29 Sep 2006 at 12:00, Dickson, Paul wrote: > Neither. Well I don't know what you have in your Localaddresses_Flat, but it is upset about something. Either the localpart length, or more likely the '-'. Is a hyphen a wordchar? Paul --

Re: [Assp-user] bug: problem going from non-config r endered page to config men

Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy schreibt: >This simply prefixes a "/" to all expanding menu option URLs. Do not use it. It renders the url to absolut. It is fixed in 21 (i think) with use of "./"

Re: [Assp-user] bug: problem going from non-config rendered page to config menu o

Fritz Borgstedt wrote: > Try 21 Thanks Fritz! - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief

Re: [Assp-user] invalid user, mail rejected.

Neither. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Sent: Friday, September 29, 2006 11:55 AM To: Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy Subject: Re: [Assp-user] invalid user, mail rejected. On 29 Sep 2006 at 11:34, Dickso

Re: [Assp-user] bug: problem going from non-config r endered page to config menu o

Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy schreibt: > >Since upgrading to (19) Try 21 - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance t

Re: [Assp-user] invalid user, mail rejected.

On 29 Sep 2006 at 11:34, Dickson, Paul wrote: > Local domains looks like this. Incoming flow: ASSP->CLAMSMTPD->SENDMAIL > fredco-md.net|nospam.fredco-md.net|mailgw1.fredco-md.net|lists.fredco-md > .net > > LOG: > Sep-29-06 11:29:31 64.233.182.191 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> invalid > address rejected:

Re: [Assp-user] bug: problem going from non-config rendered page to config menu options

Paul wrote: > Confirmed here, but I doubt it was the mods in > 19 - weren't you a version or 2 behind? This is still broken in (20). I sent Fritz a patch for line 1245. If you are interested in a quick fix, change the line from: $headers .= "\n[0]\">$c->[0]"; to: $headers .= "\n

[Assp-user] invalid user, mail rejected.

Local domains looks like this. Incoming flow: ASSP->CLAMSMTPD->SENDMAIL fredco-md.net|nospam.fredco-md.net|mailgw1.fredco-md.net|lists.fredco-md .net LOG: Sep-29-06 11:29:31 64.233.182.191 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> invalid address rejected: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I'm not sure what else could be provokin

Re: [Assp-user] Maxerrorbytes

On 29 Sep 2006 at 11:34, Fritz Borgstedt wrote: > ErrorMaxBytes! Thanks - found it in (20). - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your

Re: [Assp-user] question: which takes place first?

Paul wrote: > That didn't make sense the first 3 times I > read it. :) > > Do you mean if the HELO fails will it is still > be delayed or will it get an immediate 550? > > My testing of this earlier in the year showed > immediate rejection. (Although even the HELO > check waits for rcpt info I

Re: [Assp-user] question: which takes place first?

On 29 Sep 2006 at 10:32, Micheal Espinola Jr wrote: > Delaying or HELO check? That didn't make sense the first 3 times I read it. :) Do you mean if the HELO fails will it is still be delayed or will it get an immediate 550? My testing of this earlier in the year showed immediate rejection.

Re: [Assp-user] bug: problem going from non-config rendered page to config menu options

Paul wrote: > Confirmed here, but I doubt it was the mods in > 19 - weren't you a version or 2 behind? Yep, I was. I recently went from 16 to 19. I only know that the issue currently exists in 19. I was on vacation so I'm playing a little catch-up. --

Re: [Assp-user] bug: problem going from non-config rendered page to config menu options

Confirmed here, but I doubt it was the mods in 19 - weren't you a version or 2 behind? Paul On 29 Sep 2006 at 10:41, Micheal Espinola Jr wrote: > ASSP v1.2.5(19) > > Since upgrading to (19) I have noticed an issue involving relative URLs. > This happens in *any*

Re: [Assp-user] Bug: blackListedDomains not adding to PB

Micheal Espinola Jr wrote: blValencePB does not appear to be working.  Domains listed in blackListedDomains are not getting PB scored. Has anyone else tried to confirm this issue? - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influen

[Assp-user] bug: problem going from non-config rendered page to config menu options

ASSP v1.2.5(19) Since upgrading to (19) I have noticed an issue involving relative URLs. This happens in *any* instance when viewing a non-config menu page (white boxes: Whitelist/Redlist, Maillog Tail, Mail Analyzer, etc), and attempting to goto a config menu option (expanded plus-box pages u

[Assp-user] question: which takes place first?

Delaying or HELO check? - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cas

Re: [Assp-user] TLS/SSL with ASSP

Because then the recipients will not get added to ASSP's whitelist. Also, it will prevent the user from being able to use ASSP's email interface. James. On 29/09/2006, at 11:37 PM, Fritz Borgstedt wrote: > Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy > schreibt: >> As Luke sa

Re: [Assp-user] TLS/SSL with ASSP

Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy schreibt: > As Luke said, it won't be an issue if your users use TLS. They are >whitelisted and local, so there is no worry about RBL etc checks not >working. The user's mail client sends on port 465, Stunnel receives >it and then passes

Re: [Assp-user] TLS/SSL with ASSP

 As Luke said, it won't be an issue if your users use TLS. They are whitelisted and local, so there is no worry about RBL etc checks not working. The user's mail client sends on port 465, Stunnel receives it and then passes it on to ASSP on port 25. ASSP sees the email address in LocalAddresses_Fla

Re: [Assp-user] TLS/SSL with ASSP

Is it a big thing to bypass assp on certain (whitelisted) ip addresses (within assp) ? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 29, 2006 11:52 AM To: Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP

Re: [Assp-user] TLS/SSL with ASSP

On 29 Sep 2006 at 12:04, Brunner Markus wrote: > > What else should i use? (PGP, GPG, ...) Well if you want client to client digital signing, maybe that's the solution. I just wondered because you said that this was server to server for specified domains. Since a lot of (most?) SMTP traffic

Re: [Assp-user] TLS/SSL with ASSP

What else should i use? (PGP, GPG, ...) Markus -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 29, 2006 11:52 AM To: Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy Subject: Re: [Assp-user] TLS/SSL

Re: [Assp-user] TLS/SSL with ASSP

On 29 Sep 2006 at 11:12, Brunner Markus wrote: > > But this must be configured on the remote mailserver and on my smtp > service (exim). Am i right ? > Can the bypassing be done with the ip address ? Yes, via routing. May I ask why you must use TLS? Paul -

Re: [Assp-user] Maxerrorbytes

On 29 Sep 2006 at 11:34, Fritz Borgstedt wrote: > ErrorMaxBytes! Yes, I meant that! Tried again. 350007 bytes,. labeled 19. diff from 18 shows sleeptime removed and starttls mod only - unless I'm being denser than normal today. ---

Re: [Assp-user] Maxerrorbytes

Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy schreibt: >Fritz, I don't see this in the (19) I just downloaded. Some other >chabges, yes. ErrorMaxBytes! - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT

Re: [Assp-user] TLS/SSL with ASSP

But this must be configured on the remote mailserver and on my smtp service (exim). Am i right ? Can the bypassing be done with the ip address ? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fritz Borgstedt Sent: Friday, September 29, 2006 11:04 AM To:

[Assp-user] Maxerrorbytes

Fritz, I don't see this in the (19) I just downloaded. Some other chabges, yes. Paul - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions

Re: [Assp-user] TLS/SSL with ASSP

>is it possible to bypass the filtering of the tlsstart from assp with >the no processing feature ? no. The filtering of tlsstart happens during the smtp protocoll. The solution for this type of problem is normally to use a different port like 587 for bypassing ASSP. -

[Assp-user] TLS/SSL with ASSP

Title: TLS/SSL with ASSP Hello, is it possible to bypass the filtering of the tlsstart from assp with the no processing feature ? Because i need to use incoming tls for certain domains. Regards Markus - Take Sur