Thanks kevin, micheal,n paul for your best suggest.
- Original Message -
From: "Micheal Espinola Jr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy"
Sent: Friday, August 03, 2007 12:09 AM
Subject: Re: [Assp-user] SPAM with You've received a greet
Jeroen van Aart wrote:
> I suggest that employing a large workforce of human beings, scanning
> each email, is the most effective anti spam solution. Maybe this is a
> good business set up for a new startup? I have never failed to identify
> spam, neither had any false positives.
I suggest an a
Dickson, Paul wrote:
> I tend to think that would be detrimental to the server load, and way
> overkill. Not to mention, email is a broad enough target as it is to
> classify correctly.. I can't imagine trying to intelligently classify
> something with exponentially greater variances.
I suggest
There appears to be a condition in which ASSP neglects to process for
HELO and attachments. The condition even effects the Analyzer (not
performing any HELO checking).
Kevin confirmed the condition with example headers I provided him. The
problem does not appear to exist in 1.3.1.
Fritz: Let m
Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
>> How are you doing btw? Still in that sexy gown, or are you back home?
>
> Thanks for the question. I will leave the hospital tomorrow ( after I
> got a serious bloodpressure problem by reading messages from some
> people in this list ))).
Always the comedian. :)
If the
Kevin wrote:
> Add these lines to your BombRE, should take care of them.
>
> --
> you\'ve.received.a.(postcard|greeting|ecard).from.a.(colleague|your.partner|family.member|neighbor|mate|school-mate|school.friend|worshipper|friend|partner)
> (colleague|your.partner|family.member|neighbor|mat
Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
> Thanks for the question. I will leave the hospital tomorrow ( after I
> got a serious bloodpressure problem by reading messages from some
> people in this list ))).
LOL! I figured you had to have been home! Please try to avoid our
shenanigans until you are recovered!
I
Jufri wrote:
> hello all, I need to help
> how to setting ASSP to block SPAM with specific subject like "You've
> received a greeting card from a Neighbor!'
>
Add these lines to your BombRE, should take care of them.
--
you\'ve.received.a.(postcard|greeting|ecard).from.a.(colleague|your
Dickson, Paul wrote:
> Although I should mention that our Bayesian analysis has caught every
> one of those after the first couple days... you might want to submit
> them a few times over to the spam email interface to speed up the
> process.
Not everyone can run the Bayesian in non-testmode sadly
Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
How are you doing btw? Still in that sexy gown, or are you back home?
Thanks for the question. I will leave the hospital tomorrow ( after I
got a serious bloodpressure problem by reading messages from some
people in this list ))).
Bet you will be g
> I thought already and will do as usual the opposite ))).
>
> even numbers development.
> odd numbers stable.
I know this is probably an obvious/dumb question, but since ASSP has
been on the 1.3.4(x) series for a while, and 1.3.3 was only just now
officially released...
1.3.3 does *not* conta
>1.3.3 does *not* contain any of the features/enhancements that have
>been
>implemented in the 1.3.4(x) series, correct?
I kept them both in the same stage for at least 1.3.4 (20)
Please look for yourself.
Correct. The nest stable release will be 1.3.5.
-
Fritz Borgstedt, on 8/2/2007 8:47 AM, said the following:
> I thought already and will do as usual the opposite ))).
>
> even numbers development.
> odd numbers stable.
>
> I will leave the hospital tomorrow ( after I
> got a serious bloodpressure problem by reading messages from some
> people i
>How are you doing btw? Still in that sexy gown, or are you back home?
Thanks for the question. I will leave the hospital tomorrow ( after I
got a serious bloodpressure problem by reading messages from some
people in this list ))).
-
>Since it's a streaming check, I don't think it
>would have to read the whole file attachment in order to know it's a
>virus, spam or whatever, since it's just looking for known signatures.
>Correct me if I'm wrong.
ASSP passes AVBYTES to clamd.
Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
schreibt:
>even numbers = stable version, odd numbers = a development release.
>
>Something to think about.
I thought already and will do as usual the opposite ))).
even numbers development.
odd numbers stable.
--
Hello,
for all of you, who uses Hmailserver:
I created a script to export users (including Aliases, Lists,
Catchall) & domains (including Aliases) in text files to use with hmailserver.
http://www.hmailserver.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=10064
With best regards
Matti Haack
-
Matti Ha
Kevin wrote:
> http://www.makelovenotspam.com/
http://www.espinola.net/wiki/Make_love_not_spam
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events a
Dickson, Paul wrote:
> Although I should mention that our Bayesian analysis has caught every
> one of those after the first couple days... you might want to submit
> them a few times over to the spam email interface to speed up the
> process.
And don't forget to run rebuildspamdb.pl soon afterward
Although I should mention that our Bayesian analysis has caught every
one of those after the first couple days... you might want to submit
them a few times over to the spam email interface to speed up the
process.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Beha
Also there is a nice way of thinking in the unix world, that windows
apps tend to fail to embrace, which causes these monsterously complex
applications that have bugs all over and always lack some particular
functionality you want. One tool for one job. Then integrate the tools
you want in the wa
Use a matching regex in your bombre and make sure bombre is not in test
mode.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jufri
Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2007 8:11 AM
To: Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
Subject: Re: [Assp-
I tend to think that would be detrimental to the server load, and way
overkill. Not to mention, email is a broad enough target as it is to
classify correctly.. I can't imagine trying to intelligently classify
something with exponentially greater variances.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
hello all, I need to help
how to setting ASSP to block SPAM with specific subject like "You've
received a greeting card from a Neighbor!'
regards
- Original Message -
From: "Fritz Borgstedt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy"
Sent:
How are you doing btw? Still in that sexy gown, or are you back home?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fritz
Borgstedt
Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2007 5:58 AM
To: Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
Subject: Re: [As
Hill, Brett wrote:
>> But I think the virusscanning just do this: scan the whole message
> and them forward it. So why not handle an "Atachment content
> scan" like virusscanning? Maybe we can use the same data passed to clamd
> and do a content scan.
>
> Doesn't Virus Scanning only sca
> But I think the virusscanning just do this: scan the whole message
and them forward it. So why not handle an "Atachment content
scan" like virusscanning? Maybe we can use the same data passed to clamd
and do a content scan.
Doesn't Virus Scanning only scan the first ?% of a file (not
Ged West wrote:
> I apologize to the community for it taking so long to get this
> published. I was on vacation in the beautiful -yet remote- (read:
> poorly connected) state of Idaho.
>
Just an FYI the stat.pl file has a known bug. It doesn't display the bad
attachment percentage correctly.
K
Matti Haack wrote:
>> If it had to stop and save each message to disk, extract the pdf,
>> analyze it, then deliver it if it passes.it would just be slower
>> than a snail stuck in molasses in the arctic, and it would'nt work.
> But I think the virusscanning just do this: scan the whole mes
Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
> Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
> schreibt:
>> I hope your vacation was relaxing! But back to painful reality, I see
>> there is no official statement in the changelog.txt as to why 1.3.2
>> is a
>> skipped version. Is there something I can p
I thing it was just an evil version:
(whatever I tried I got an evil number...)
1.3.2 ->
1+3+2=6
1*3*2=6
13/2=nearly 6
so it means 1.3.2=666 -> evil Version
1.3.3 -> 7 -> magic anti spam solution
Matti
> Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
>> But I would not explain it. It is as it is. Fritz is the bad gu
Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
> But I would not explain it. It is as it is. Fritz is the bad guy who
> decided that.
))) Don't be silly! I was only curious if something needed to be
formally noted or explained.
-
This SF.net email
> If it had to stop and save each message to disk, extract the pdf,
> analyze it, then deliver it if it passes.it would just be slower
> than a snail stuck in molasses in the arctic, and it would'nt work.
But I think the virusscanning just do this: scan the whole message and them
forward i
Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
schreibt:
>I hope your vacation was relaxing! But back to painful reality, I see
>there is no official statement in the changelog.txt as to why 1.3.2
>is a
>skipped version. Is there something I can put in the wiki to answer
>any
>ques
GrayHat wrote:
> I don't know how many here use the ASSP
> "infected email report" feature, I do (at least
> on some servers) now, from time to time it
> may be interesting having the full original
> email message headers in such reports
> this may be useful to find out the "path" of
> the message
Micheal Espinola Jr wrote:
> Doug Lytle wrote:
>> I'm seeing a large number of those PDF spams now coming across zipped.
>
> There is a new rash of PDF spams going around that are (AFAIK)
> incomplete attachments. i.e., they attachment is there, but the
> messages are missing the header informati
Matti Haack wrote:
> Would it be possible to use File::Extract::PDF to analyze pdf
> attachments with the basian and bombre filters?
>
> Additionatly there are more File::Extract filters which could be
> usefull:
> http://cpan.uwinnipeg.ca/htdocs/File-Extract/
ASSP doesn't deal wit
Micheal Espinola Jr wrote:
> Ged West wrote:
>> I apologize to the community for it taking so long to get this
>> published. I was on vacation in the beautiful -yet remote- (read:
>> poorly connected) state of Idaho.
>
> I hope your vacation was relaxing! But back to painful reality, I see
> the
Would it be possible to use File::Extract::PDF to analyze pdf
attachments with the basian and bombre filters?
Additionatly there are more File::Extract filters which could be
usefull:
http://cpan.uwinnipeg.ca/htdocs/File-Extract/
Matti
> Doug Lytle wrote:
>> I'm seeing a large num
Ged West wrote:
> I apologize to the community for it taking so long to get this
> published. I was on vacation in the beautiful -yet remote- (read:
> poorly connected) state of Idaho.
I hope your vacation was relaxing! But back to painful reality, I see
there is no official statement in the cha
Matti Haack wrote:
> FB> Net::Syslog is already built in ASSP.
> And syslog with assp and windows runs fine for some month...
Craziness. I'm gonna guess it was during my recent downtime some months
back.
I only came across the reference when searching with Google for ASSP
problems in various alt
Doug Lytle wrote:
> I'm seeing a large number of those PDF spams now coming across zipped.
There is a new rash of PDF spams going around that are (AFAIK)
incomplete attachments. i.e., they attachment is there, but the
messages are missing the header information pointing to the attachment.
And as
42 matches
Mail list logo
