Yep !
Well, you are in the right place.
My ASSP experience is 99,5% accurate spam-blocking.
I had the same experience with spamassassin. That's why I am
here :-)
s.
--- On Fri, 30/1/09, Nelson Serafica wrote:
> From: Nelson Serafica
> Subject: Re: [Assp-user] assp hardware requirements
>
It eats a lot of memory, lack of web interface and need time for
maintenance. Also some spam is getting through.
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Spyros Tsiolis wrote:
>
> Nelson, would you like to share with us your experience with
> SpamAssassin ? Why you want to move from SA to ASSP ?
> (not
Hi Nelson,
If this is only the specs for ASSP (and no other server, like
an MTA, or a webserver on the same box), then it is more than
enough.
Fritz, correct me here if I am wrong, but I think this is a
good spec for ASSP.
Nelson, would you like to share with us your experience with
SpamAssassi
I'm new to assp since I usually used spamassassin and want to replace it and
use assp. I'll be installing assp to AMD 2Ghz, 40GB HD and 512 DDR400.
Does it meet the hardware requirements?
--
Nelson Serafica
http://nelsontux.blogspot.com
-
For what it's worth I have *never* had a successful catch of Eicar with ClamAV
on ASSP.
When I emailed the list I don't remember getting affirmation that it worked so
I disabled it and worked on the assumption it wasn't installed/working
correctly.
-Original Message-
From: terii wang [m
ASSP is no specialized for attachment testing, ASSP V1 does attachment
as described in the GUI. It tests for bad and good attachments,
nothing else.
--
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge w
http://www.nospamtoday.com/emailsecurity/
ASSP (testmode) detects test #1 (virus) and #2 (attachment - .bat), but doesn't
seem to catch test #3-7.
>From what I can see not 100% correct of following tests.
#3 - GTUBE test.
#4 - Blank filename attachment test.
#5 - Blank filename attachment te
> It would be great, if you can install 1.5.0.. I promise you, it is
stable.
and I can confirm it; running it in production w/o any issue and btw
it solved a lot of minor problem/issues; I can heartly recommend
upgrading to 1.5.0; ok, maybe you'll have to upgrade or install some
perl modules, but
It is difficult to guess what may be wrong. If you want, send me your
IP und the password and I will have a look.
It would be great, if you can install 1.5.0.. I promise you, it is
stable. But for me it is simpler, because all bugfixing is already in
it.
For upgrading Just replace assp.pl and copy
Hi Fritz. Version 1.4.3.1 and I've tried flaggeds...@mydomain.org and another
email of a user that just left.
A lot of the settings in Collecting are set to 'spamfolder & sendAllSpam'
and hovering over the sendAllSpam link shows dbl...@mydomain.org, which is
what's currently set.
Thanks for your
http://apps.sourceforge.net/mediawiki/assp/index.php?title=Unix
It is listed in the wiki. I tried out the same instructions on Debian etch and
working yesterday.
On Wed, 28 Jan 2009 19:03:20 -0500
Mina Azer wrote:
> Does anybody have a recent/updated how to integrate clamav with assp? in a
>
Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
schreibt:
>
>I've tried two different local addresses in the sendAllSpam field, as
>well as
>CatchAll, but nothing is sent to them. Is there another setting
>somewhere
>that overrides this? Something else to enable it?
What version are
I've tried two different local addresses in the sendAllSpam field, as well as
CatchAll, but nothing is sent to them. Is there another setting somewhere
that overrides this? Something else to enable it?
Thanks!
Mike
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Copy-Spam-and-Send-to-thi
13 matches
Mail list logo
