On Aug 5, 2010, at 10:22 AM, Mark Edwards wrote:
> On Aug 4, 2010, at 1:07 PM, Mark Edwards wrote:
>
>> No reply yet to this, so let me simplify...
>>
>> Why would a message that has Bayesian score of 1.0 and a total score of
>> 44 be passed with no headers because of testmode, when the fol
On Aug 4, 2010, at 1:07 PM, Mark Edwards wrote:
> No reply yet to this, so let me simplify...
>
> Why would a message that has Bayesian score of 1.0 and a total score of
> 44 be passed with no headers because of testmode, when the following are set:
>
> baysTestMode: off
> baysConf: 0
> bay
For Users of ASSP schreibt:
>PassAttach
Try this version:
-Passing File Extensions (PassAttach)
This regular expression is used to identify attachments that should
mark the message as noprocessing. Separate entries with a pipe |. The
dot . is assumed to precede these, so don't include it.
http
Hello Fritz,
It took me a while to get back to this task.
I have configured ASSP 1.7.5.7.
Seems the PassAttach is only to allow specific attachment to pass ASSP
checking.
It is not whitening the mail messages itself which still being processed
by ASSP.
Is it possible whitening an e-mail messages
> I always set my local domains up as lan.example.com,
> with nameserver views to prevent anyone external ever
> knowing about the sub-domain.
Yes, that's one of the methods I wrote about in my other
email and it's pretty flexible too, see, in case one has
multiple offices, it's easy to "expand"
I always set my local domains up as lan.example.com, with nameserver
views to prevent anyone external ever knowing about the sub-domain.
--
The Palm PDK Hot Apps Program offers developers who use the
Plug-In Development K
> Ok - I'll rephrase. Since Apple/Zeroconf/Avahi/mDNS/whoever
> else blatantly stole the ".local" domain suffix, in express violation
> of previous standard practices (if not published standards or RFC's)
> preached by various prophets including followers of the mighty Church
... of the swimming
