upgrade Email::Simple to version 2.201
Thomas
DISCLAIMER:
***
This email and any files transmitted with it may be confidential, legally
privileged and protected in law and are intended solely for the use of the
individual to whom it is addre
On 2013-09-13 11:29 AM, Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
> Availibity does not change whatever is in front.
I agree, but when ASSP is the front door, there is *much* more that can
go wrong to kill a perl script, that won't phase postfix.
--
Best regards,
*/Charles/*
---
On 2013-09-13 11:03 AM, Grayhat wrote:
> What I'm trying to say is that, while the kind of config you are asking
> for could work (see ISPIP in ASSP), it partially defeats the whole
> purpose of having ASSP on your pipeline; see... with your config, the
> incoming email would be received by the fr
For Users of ASSP schreibt:
>
>That is not what he is asking for.
>
>ASSP has an *excellent* spam reporting capability, white/blacklist
>options for senders, and content filtering options.
>
>But, not everyone wants to rely on a single perl script for their
>SMTP
>'front door', as it is much mo
I think I need a better understanding of relayPort. Is relayPort a port that
ASSP listens on?
> the outgoing email
> sent out from the mailserver, instead, flows to the ASSP "relayport"
> allowing ASSP to do auto whitelisting and to check the message, ASSP in
> this case, proxies the connection
>
> Outgoing: mail client -> postfix(587) -> ASSP(10587) ->
> postfix(10026) -> internet
> Incoming: Internet -> postfix(25)
> -> ASSP(10025) -> postfix(10026) -> dovecot -> mail client
well.. it can be configured this way, but such a config will forbid you
from using some of the ASSP f
On 2013-09-13 9:40 AM, Thomas Eckardt wrote:
>> I had asked about this a long time ago and was told it was possible, but
>> don't recall the details.
> The configuration is as simple it could be. IMHO it is the same like assp
> is behind an ISP - in this special case the ISP-server is the postfix
>I had asked about this a long time ago and was told it was possible, but
>don't recall the details.
The configuration is as simple it could be. IMHO it is the same like assp
is behind an ISP - in this special case the ISP-server is the postfix in
front of assp.
It is very special if the postfi
On 2013-09-13 5:27 AM, Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
> For Users of ASSP schreibt:
>> That standard setup would also allow the delay feature to work
>> properly.
>
> ASSP is designed to be the first responder on incoming mail. It is
> essential to reply immediately to the spam sender (not sending
> som
For Users of ASSP schreibt:
>
>That standard setup would also allow the delay feature to work
>properly.
ASSP is designed to be the first responder on incoming mail. It is
essential to reply immediately to the spam sender (not sending
something). Not doing so would add to the Backscatter we are
10 matches
Mail list logo
