:: On Thu, 27 Jul 2017 13:23:08 -0400
::
:: "William L. Thomson Jr." wrote:
> As a long time user I should know this. Though to my knowledge I am
> not sure if this is possible or not. I know emails can be set to be
> rejected via redlist, etc. But this causes the emails to be
> rejected, bounce
:: On Tue, 25 Jul 2017 14:22:01 +0100
::
:: cw wrote:
> So how have other people got their databases to be accurate?
> All the best,
A decent approach is using the default regexp and some good and
reliable DNSBLs/URIBLs to catch "surefire spam", that will help
training the bayes/hmm which, af
:: On Sun, 19 Mar 2017 08:53:50 +0100
::
::
Thomas Eckardt wrote:
> I don't want to maintain these modules on CPAN. They are provided as
> assp package at SF and they are included in the assp module
> installer. Possibly I'll include them in the assp/lib folder in
> future. Another way to solve
:: On Mon, 18 Jul 2016 11:20:51 +0200
:: <20160718092051.830ff...@mx02.sygmanet.be>
:: "Andy Knuts" wrote:
> So, all a spammer has to do is add a DKIM record to his domain, in
> order to avoid getting blocked by RBL's?
sure, then he'll be rejected due to DKIM failure LOL !
:: On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 08:52:09 -0400
:: <072801d1c7cd$e522a0d0$af67e270$@ca>
:: "Ethical Host - John MacKenzie" wrote:
> Have support for SAN wildcard ssl certificates? I tried using it but
> assp seemed to only pull the first domain listed on the certificate
> for validation which doesn't wor
:: On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 13:30:45 -0400
:: <56e99845.4080...@herodata.com>
:: Jay wrote:
> Here's the machine's specs: Windows 7 Pro 64bit, 16GB ram and Core-i7
> 3770 8core 3.4Ghz processor.
windows 7 isn't a server OS
-
:: On Fri, 4 Mar 2016 08:17:54 +0100
::
::
Thomas Eckardt wrote:
> >You cannot go
> >download each previous version that was released.
>
> This is simply NOT true.
>
> https://sourceforge.net/projects/assp/files/OldFiles/
>
> But you need a SF account and you have to login to see the old
:: On Thu, 25 Feb 2016 20:50:13 +0100
::
:: Johannes Wissen wrote:
> here you can see the debug log of the last transmits to the assp
> server, really good for debugging:
> I am not an expert in reviewing this, but I would assume that assp is
> missing the [CR][LF].[CR][LF] which is splitted
:: On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 13:01:06 +0100
:: <20160217130106.2...@gmx.net>
:: Grayhat wrote:
> :: On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 12:55:08 +0100
> > No, and it doesn't really make sense; the issue is due to the way
> > ClamAV reloads signatures and not to the way ASSP check
:: On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 12:55:08 +0100
:: <20160217125508.7...@gmx.net>
:: Grayhat wrote:
> :: On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 12:27:58 +0100
> ::
> ::
> "Raynaud Alexandre" wrote:
>
>
> > Is there a way to force ASSP to imperatively wait clamd to be up
> &g
:: On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 12:27:58 +0100
::
::
"Raynaud Alexandre" wrote:
> Is there a way to force ASSP to imperatively wait clamd to be up
> before proceed any emails (even if it slows mail delivery) and a
> trick to make it realise clamd is up as soon clamd finished reload
> its database (25s)?
:: On Wed, 13 Jan 2016 08:56:50 -0600
:: <569665b2.3090...@valnet.net>
:: Nick Bright wrote:
> The RAM usage of the ASSP processes reaches 35GB or higher, causing
> the machine to go to swap; and the server to randomly kill other
> processes to satiate the RAM demands of ASSP. Obviously, this can
:: On Wed, 16 Dec 2015 06:43:58 -0500
:: <56714e7e.3070...@datapacket.net>
:: Data Packet Networks wrote:
> The spamdb does load on start-up. After running for a few hours the
> spamdb and spam helo files go missing until i restore from backup and
> restart assp.
>
> Any idea on what might cau
:: On Wed, 11 Nov 2015 10:12:00 -0500
:: <56435ac0.3040...@herodata.com>
:: Jay wrote:
> Also we are using ASSP version 2.4.5(15162) with Perl 5.16.3 32bit.
I think you'd better upgrade to a newer version (latest one is 2.4.6
build 15314); that said, I suspect that the strange chars found into
t
:: On Tue, 21 Apr 2015 18:11:35 +0200
::
::
Thomas Eckardt wrote:
> At least assp should know that 0.x.x.x is nonroutable - it currently
> does NOT. This will be fixed in next build!
> Scott, this change will make 0.x.x.x obsolet in every IP address
> definition !!!
Thomas, the problem is tha
:: On Tue, 21 Apr 2015 11:07:02 -0400
::
:: Scott MacLean wrote:
> I have a couple users who have valid emails coming from clients that
> are being outright rejected by my server. One of them is using
> outlook.com (Microsoft web email) to send the email that is being
> rejected.
>
> The proble
:: On Tue, 21 Apr 2015 07:56:40 +0200
::
> Have you ever read the 'SSL Proxy and TLS Support' section in the
> GUI- for example 'DoTLS'?
I was about to write the same :) getting back to Jay's message...
> Thank you for correcting me. I had thought that the difference
> between port 587 and port
:: On Sun, 19 Apr 2015 22:27:16 + (WET DST)
:: <14295004370.efee9aa.5...@m5.chicago.il.us>
:: "Jay F. Shachter" wrote:
> This is, in a sense, the right thing to do, because even if my Postfix
> accepted the STARTTLS command (it does not), port 25 is not the
> appropriate port on which to send
It was Tue, 30 Dec 2014 18:02:05 +0200 when
Gil Bahat wrote:
> because (afaik) BATV doesn't quiesce automatic responses
oh, but if "automatic responses" are valid, that is come from a legit
message "you" sent then they should come through; on the other hand, an
automatic response generated by a
It was Tue, 30 Dec 2014 17:46:07 +0200 when
Gil Bahat wrote:
> it's the lesser of evils when it comes to e-mail backscatter, imho...
> but turns out quite a few webmail providers respect it: sapo.pt,
> rediffmail, outlook.com, possibly even gmail. we are petitioning
> yahoo, mail.ru, yandex.ru an
It was Tue, 30 Dec 2014 16:47:33 +0100 when
Thomas Eckardt wrote:
> Thank you Andrea.
Oh, you're welcome, and since we're at it... you may be interested in
reading this https://github.com/geerlingguy/Imap/issues/6
> Who else than MS ... :(
heh :/
-
It was Tue, 30 Dec 2014 16:09:47 +0100 when
Thomas Eckardt wrote:
> X-Auto-Response-Suppress
that one comes directly from the source of all evils :D
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee219609%28v=EXCHG.80%29.aspx
--
It was Tue, 30 Dec 2014 10:59:10 +0200 when
Gil Bahat wrote:
> 2. we are using VERP to track distinct bounces and have a very high
> volume (clause #6)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Variable_envelope_return_path#Disadvantages
-
:: On Tue, 11 Nov 2014 14:20:04 +
::
:: Matt Brown wrote:
> Thanks for the heads up on AsADaemon - set this to 0 and
> retried ./assp.pl
y/w
> I got the following over and over and over - looped.
[...]
> Not quite sure why this was even in the assp directory it must of
> been unzipped/ta
:: On Tue, 11 Nov 2014 08:17:55 +
::
:: Matt Brown wrote:
> starting as daemon[OK]
> forked a new silent process [OK]
> Not knowing a huge amount about perl, is there a way to stop the fork
> and monitor what happens at this point? or a debug switch?
you shoul
:: On Mon, 10 Nov 2014 15:53:32 +
::
:: Matt Brown wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have been running V2 of ASSP for over 2 years - which I must say
> has been excellent at stopping spam on my server and my vm colo
> (mxbackup) and extremely reliable. It would appear since the latest
> update 2.4.3 (1431
:: On Wed, 24 Sep 2014 15:28:43 +
:: <5ccb67a6fa6f8244bed9f1a68b59fec00198149...@newman.corp.necomm.com>
:: Jay Tarbox wrote:
> I've got a word being scored as a high probablility spam bad word,
> how can I change that to a good word?
The ASSP bayesian engine does NOT work that way, that is
:: On Fri, 19 Sep 2014 14:58:16 +
::
::
Tim Evans wrote:
> I didn't know about that tool, but I suspect it suffers from the same
> bug (or a similar one) as I am running into. When I check it
> manually, it looks OK C:\>nslookup Default Server: .sparling.com
> Address: 1.1.1.1
Sorry,
:: On Fri, 19 Sep 2014 14:31:26 +
::
::
Tim Evans wrote:
> Sep-17-14 10:07:02 73622-03566 [Worker_2] 173.160.199.113
> to: us...@sparling.com [scoring]
> SPF: permerror ip=173.160.199.113
> mailfrom=us...@pacificlightingsystems.com
> helo=glaze.pacificlightingsystems.com
interesting, the
:: On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 10:01:06 -0300 (BRT)
::
::
anah...@anahuac.eu wrote:
> I found it!
>
> But there is no rebuildspamdb.pl script anymore?
no, in v2 it's a module and it runs in its own thread from the main
app; you schedule it from the GUI. As a note, trying to manually run an
older vers
:: On Mon, 15 Sep 2014 13:55:40 -0400 (EDT)
::
::
Doug Lytle wrote:
> >> Should I upgrade inplace or load up a new server (virtual)?
>
> If you'd like a quick way to revert, then I'd roll a new VM.
agreed; setup a new, clean VM, install the needed prerequisites then
proceed setting up Perl and
:: On Mon, 15 Sep 2014 18:53:45 +0300
::
:: "Victor Miasnikov" wrote:
> Best use Perl v5.16.3 ( or one of higher versions: 5.18 / 5.20)
warning, I'm not sure all the needed modules are available for 5.20;
also, if installing on an x64 platform, use the x32 perl since using
the x64 won't give
:: On Mon, 04 Aug 2014 09:33:54 -0400
:: <53df8bc2.9090...@herodata.com>
:: Jay Altemoos wrote:
> Has anyone else run into this issue?
not lately; at any rate, using ASSP in production on a "windows 7" box
isn't exactly a good idea; Win7 has a number of limitations related to
sockets and other s
:: On Tue, 15 Jul 2014 07:45:51 +0200
::
::
Thomas Eckardt wrote:
> NEVER NEVER !!! !NEVER use public DNS-servers with ASSP ,
> if you use any of RWL,DNSBL, URIBL or Backscatter-DNS checks !!
>
> this includes also 8.8.8.8 and 8.8.4.4
>
> install and configure at least TWO local
Il giorno Mon, 19 May 2014 18:34:41 +0200
Thomas Eckardt ha scritto:
> Hi all,
>
> V1 development has been stopped in May 2014. Possibly there will be
> done some bugfixing until end of 2014.
> EOL of V1 is anounced for the 31 December 2014.
>
> Please upgrade to V2, which is and will be active
> Hi all,
>
> Fritz Borgstedt (15. April 1945 - 8. Mai 2014) is no longer with us.
> He lost the battle with cancer.
>
> Fritz may no longer be with us, but his legacy lives on.
this is bad, bad news, but for sure you're right, his legacy will live
on ! Thomas, do you, by chance, know if Fritz
:: On Thu, 10 Apr 2014 10:34:02 +0200
::
:: mailingl...@modernbiztonsag.org wrote:
> If i delete the "bad" email according to the rebuilddebug.txt the
> process finishes just fine.
instead of deleting the "bad" email, (g)zip it up and send the sample
to Thomas, that may help him finding out what
> > Check the "ldaplistdb", delete any "@me.com" reference in there
>
> thx a lot, seems to be fixed! although we don't use ldap there were
> corresponding entries...
> is there anything i can do to avoid this kind of 'false positives'?
AYUP, the issue is caused by a BUG in some older ASSP vers
:: On Mon, 10 Mar 2014 02:50:34 -0700 (PDT)
:: <1394445034388-38189.p...@n3.nabble.com>
:: larsneo wrote:
> adresses @me.com seem to be recogniced as 'local' - resulting in
> delivery problems. they even can't be manually whitelisted via
> 'White/Redlist/Tuplets'. me.com is *not* within
> 'file:f
> >the senderbase service is free only up to a given number of queries,
> > after that, any further DNS query coming from a given IP won't get a
> > valid answer
> 2.3.3 and 2.3.4 build 13276 don't have that problem
Thomas... it isn't an ASSP issue; ASSP can do its better to cache
answers and s
> I am running Assp v2.3.3(13217) with Net::SenderBase 1.01
>
> I have DoCountryBlocking = Block. I have a list of countries in a
> file, file:files/blockcountry.txt, and CountryCodeBlockedRe.
> The format of the file is like this:
> AE
> AR
> BF
>
> It used to work, but for some reason, it doe
> I have a ASSP installed connecting to a OpenLDAP server to check
> Local Addresses. On the Postfix Server I got canonical domains like
> original.foo and originalcan.foo is the canonical domain to
> original.foo. So messages coming to originalcan.foo should be
> redirected to original.foo, but t
> There is nothing wrong !
>
> Why such a lot of excitement ?
uh... no, you misunderstood (or I was unclear); I was just saying that
a message is accepted (or rejected) by the SMTP as long as it sees the
ending dot; the QUIT isn't required for it... then, sure, a well
behaved client should send
> > This depends on your MTA. If the DATA part was done (\r\n.\r\n was
> > sent), some mail server deliver the mail even a 'QUIT' was not
> > received.
> Thomas... maybe I'm wrong (or not completely awake ) but most
> (all ?) MTAs will accept a message as long as, after the data part
> they recei
> This depends on your MTA. If the DATA part was done (\r\n.\r\n was
> sent), some mail server deliver the mail even a 'QUIT' was not
> received.
Thomas... maybe I'm wrong (or not completely awake ) but most
(all ?) MTAs will accept a message as long as, after the data part they
receive the final
>
> Outgoing: mail client -> postfix(587) -> ASSP(10587) ->
> postfix(10026) -> internet
> Incoming: Internet -> postfix(25)
> -> ASSP(10025) -> postfix(10026) -> dovecot -> mail client
well.. it can be configured this way, but such a config will forbid you
from using some of the ASSP f
> Q: how do I go about adjusting the SSL cipher that assp uses for the
> web interface (re here
just setup the ASSP web interface to listen on "local" (127.whatever)
and then use (e.g.) STunnel to expose the interface to the WAN
---
> The spf check failed, because the remote service (icloud in this
> case) used the reply-to field, to specify the user's own address
the SPF check, if I'm not wrong, checks the "MAIL FROM" (that is the
*envelope* from), so, if the "iWhatever" is screwing things, you can't
blame it for doing what
> I'm fairly new to ASSP, and looking to add Barracuda to the DNSBL.
> The RBl is located at b.barracudacentral.org
>
> My current setting, which is the default looks like this...
>
> zen.spamhaus.org=>0.84|cbl.abuseat.org=>0.94|bl.mailspike.net=>0.84|
> ix.dnsbl.manitu.net=>0.98|dnsbl-1.uceprot
> There is one more thing I would like to try. I don’t really need the
> ‘pro’ functions of V2 so would be happy to downgrade to V1. I asked
> someone this question several times but got no reply that made any
> sense so am asking the rest of this community.
First of all, you should understand th
> Nice setup but wouldn't that mean that all clients would have to
> change their outbound port to 125?
Nope, reread what I wrote; ASSP will be listening on port 25 so clients
will just connect to that port where ASSP will proxy connections to
hMS so the client won't need to change their SMTP por
> Before installing assp, hmailserver sends and receives email just
> fine.
>
> After installing assp, I cannot send but can receive emails.
hm... sounds like there may be some problem with the config; didn't
check your config (also since the ML strips off attachments - and in
any case, better
> >However assp does not support such verification, right? -> NO
>
> it does.
Thomas... don't feed the trolls :)
--
LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime Remote support for IT. Free Trial
Remotely access PCs and mobile d
> Similar but more sane idea is SPF, but it also breaks many things like
> forwarding messages.
Uh... "breaks forwarding" ?!? Yes, it does, but only if you implement
SPF and don't implement SRS, otherwise it won't break anything
--
> Does ASSP have the ability to 'check' an SMTP connection is actually
> coming from a real server and not a botnetted PC? By this I mean to
> suspend processing an incoming connection and call back to the
> originating IP address on port 25 seeing if a real server answers?
BAD idea; a lot of
> Sorry, that's right. The host make two mistakes. First, the host
> talks early and second, the host is sending non-ASCII data. The
> second mistake is subject to kill assp.
Thomas... that "hex data" issue resembles something I've observed too;
and if I'm not wrong it's due to clients try to t
> We have been using ASSP for a short time, and we are in need of
> having ASSP relay our outgoing email as well as filter incoming email.
> I can't seem to get the outgoing to work. I have been making changes
> under Network Setup and Relaying sections. What am I missing?
> We are using Groupwis
Hello all
I think that sooner or later I'll have to do the move and
upgrade the current ActivePerl to version 5.14.x - now,
before jumping barefoot into such a task, I'd like some
more "insider infos" ... but let me detail the current setup
of a system I'm planning to use as the migration "victim"
> Do you know a tool to test my antispam infrastructure?
Could you please expand your question a little bit ?
What do you mean by "a tool to test..." - do you mean
some app which will send you some ton of spam ?
In such a case, notice that it won't be so effective since
many checks are perform
> My ASSP keeps rejecting a lot of email as unsolicited.
>
> Even to my own email. Where would I look for this configuration error?
You'd better start from the reject messages you get back
and from the ASSP logs, those, together may give you
(and possibly us, if you'll post details here) some trac
> Hello Grayhat,
> Any suggestion on what I should do?
My suggestion... well... is to try the following
setup a virtual machine (e.g. VMware or what
fits your heart's contents) with whatever O/S you
want (assuming it's one of the "supported" ones
for ASSP)
Install Per
> # bunzip2 perl-5.12.2.tar.bz2
DO NOT USE PERL 5.12 !
Or, if you do that, you'll be on your own
--
Enable your software for Intel(R) Active Management Technology to meet the
growing manageability and security demands of
> # bunzip2 perl-5.12.2.tar.bz2
DO NOT USE PERL 5.12 !
Or, if you do that, you'll be on your own
--
Enable your software for Intel(R) Active Management Technology to meet the
growing manageability and security demands of
> I need help on the issue below
We aren't *working* here, just volunteering our time, so,
please DO NOT EXPECT immediate answers and, by
the way, telling "it's urgent" won't help - either
That said, if you're willing to upgrade from v1 to v2 my
suggestion is to ensure you have Perl 5.10 installe
> Use the 32bits version of Perl, pick version 5.10 since
> the 5.12 may still have some "glitches" and, if possible,
forgot... whatever version of ASSP you'll decide to use,
before going into production, test it by setting up a VM
(use whatever virtualization platform you prefer) and
fiddle wi
> I will try it.
> But, it seems that ASSP v2 is not so popular...
> All the messages in the list are about 1.8.x.x
Try joining the list :)
--
The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE:
> I am plannig this installation:
>
> Windows 2008 Server R2 64bits
> ActivePerl-5.12.2.1203-MSWin32-x64-294165
> ASSP_1.8.5.3
>
> Is this possible and stable?
> If not, which Perl-ASSP combination is stable to run over MSWin-x64?
Use the 32bits version of Perl, pick version 5.10 since
the 5.1
> Maximum Errors Per Session 5
> Maximum Sessions 32
> Maximum Sessions Per IP Number 5
Wasn't referring to THOSE, see my original email
about "noop" limits
--
Protect Your Site and Customers from Malware Attacks
Learn
> Thanks for advise. sendNoopInfo was unchecked and smtpNOOP..
> settings were more or less the same. unfortunately no avail.
What about the OTHER settings (smtp session limits ?) not sure
there exist in v1 - I'm using v2 and they are there for a reason :D
---
> since recent 2(?) updates i see in MTA SMTP log the
> following while copying spam to sendAllSpam:
> (ASSP + MTA on same box)
[...]
try the following
* In SMTP Session Limits:
set smtpNOOPIdleTimeout to 5
set smtpNOOPIdleTimeoutCount to 3
* In Logging
uncheck sendNoopInfo
--
> To: Undisclosed recipients:;
>
> There is no ASSP-Tag in the Header.
Ensure to check the "AddIntendedForHeader" in ASSP
(you'll find it under the "spam control" section of the GUI
enabling that will tell ASSP to insert an additional header
(i.e. X-Assp-Intended-For) containing the envelope RC
> Gotcha, I have done that.
Hmmm... then something went wrong :/
> Just wonder how many years it takes to get it "even"
It depends from your email volume; on a low volume
box it may take a month or so; just ensure that ASSP
sees all the traffic (inbound and outbound) and run
the rebuildspamdb
> well this ASSP has been in production for 1305 days
>
> Spam Weight:1,747,324
> Not-Spam Weight: 4,836,427
>
> Corpus norm: 0.3613 (warning: ham heavy)
> Corpus correction settings - low:"0.5
> high:1.5 minimum files:1 minimum
> days:14"
It also depends from HOW you built your
> I have Bayes turned off
> it blocks too much
Hmm... you probably didn't train it correctly, see, training
the bayes filter is tricky and you just CAN'T pick a bunch
of spam/nospam emails from someone else and use it
to build your corpus since in most cases your email traffic
patterns will be d
[...]
> checking and adding PPM-repositories for module installation
> 'ppm' is not recognized as an internal or external command,
> operable program or batch file.
Uninstall ActivePerl, reboot (not needed but it's just to stay on
the safe side) and ensure to remove the Perl folder, then install
A
> I always set my local domains up as lan.example.com,
> with nameserver views to prevent anyone external ever
> knowing about the sub-domain.
Yes, that's one of the methods I wrote about in my other
email and it's pretty flexible too, see, in case one has
multiple offices, it's easy to "expand"
> Ok - I'll rephrase. Since Apple/Zeroconf/Avahi/mDNS/whoever
> else blatantly stole the ".local" domain suffix, in express violation
> of previous standard practices (if not published standards or RFC's)
> preached by various prophets including followers of the mighty Church
... of the swimming
> Previously I was taught to use .local for my LAN domain suffixes.
> But with the new auto-configuration technologies like mDNS and
> Avahi .local has now become a reserved namespace.
Hm... first of all it's NOT reserved; no DNS server (try running
a query like "dig local NS") is serving that T
> I'm not sure if I should attempt a reinstall?
Given that ASSP is working (set aside this feature) I don't
think a reinstall may be needed or may cure the issue
I'm (or you're) probably missing something I'm not sure
what it is though (it has been a looong day here :D) hope
someone will jump in a
> Still no luck unfortunately.
> I'm pretty sure there is nothing else required right?
>
> ASSP Log:
>
> Aug-03-10 15:57:52 47472-01474 [Whitelisted] 192.168.100.12
> to: assp-s...@example.local whitelisted --
> mym...@example.com on whitelist -- -> notspam/1474.eml;
Hmmm... sounds like ASSP
> 1) invent a "dummy" domain, like "assp-nospam.org" (seems to be an
> available domain name)
just use a non-existent TLD like (e.g.) ".lan" or ".local" or the like
:)
in such a case, if your main (real) domain is "example.com" you
may have "example.local"
> 2) tell ASSP that this domain is one
> I would like ASSP to not filter mails if they have a specific
> attachment in them (pass to the destination SMTP server with no
> modifications)
you'll need to build your own regular expressions to allow some
messages matching it to get through; at any rate the whole idea
is quite crazy imHo s
> Sorry I forgot the rest, here they are
here are the sigs I'm currently using
rsync://rsync.sanesecurity.net/sanesecurity/sanesecurity.ftm
rsync://rsync.sanesecurity.net/sanesecurity/sigwhitelist.ign2
rsync://rsync.sanesecurity.net/sanesecurity/junk.ndb
rsync://rsync.sanesecurity.net/sanesecuri
> We are getting a lot of image spam through lately.
>
> Does anyone else have this issue?
>
> How did you solve it?
http://www.sanesecurity.com/databases.htm
--
This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint
What will you
> Recently I got some important email that blocked by ASSP. After 2
> days, users complaint to me that they can't receive email from friend.
> I Do quick check on the log and turn out the email is blocked.
>
> So I have an Idea, what if all the email is just flagged, wether is
> spam or not spam.
>> Why is postmaster a default spamlover? Is there a circumstance
>> where I would want to have the postmaster account receive spam
>> mail?
> My understanding is, according to the RFCs, postmaster and abuse
> addresses should never be spam filtered...
Right; the postmaster and abuse addresses
> Paul Dickson is the list administrator as far as I know. It is the
> steven_rutherf...@pap.state.ga.us address that you want removed,
> correct?
Well... I'm /suggesting/ to remove the address since it isn't active anymore
---
steven_rutherf...@pap.state.ga.us on Fri, 25 Jun 2010 06:05:57 -0400
wrote to "GrayHat"
to whoever handles this list; please REMOVE the above
address from the list; every time I mail to the list I get back
a message like the following one (headers included)
Return-Path:
X-F
> Well yes it was happening. Had a user with
> a very weak password, but no longer.
Uhm... does that "no longer" refer to the weak
password or to... the user ?
--
ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate
> That ip is not Local to us, so why is assp thinking it is?
stolen credentials
--
ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate
GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the
lucky parental unit.
>> after upgrade to ASSP v2.X you can as wrote Grayhat:
>> use ClamAV with additional signatures from SaneSecurity
>> and Co
> "ClamAV with additional signatures from SaneSecurity
> and Co" can be used in ASSP Version 1 too.
right; it's not an ASSP relat
> Hello,
> ASSP is good, ASSP is great. Because of ASSP the nearly 98% of mail we
> receive that is spam is blocked. (98%. That is just wrong.)
> Except for the "419" scams.
> What is it about those types of messages the ASSP cannot get any
> traction to reject them?
Strange, I don't get any 419
> We filter mail for several sub-organizations across the state and
> currently the only mail ingress point is our current ASSP server.
> Any other server I'd set up for this project I would have total
> control over. I'm curious why I've gotten two responses that a
> backup MTA was a bad idea
> However, I've read that it is possible that all *outgoing emails* send
> by qmail will be added to notspam folder of assp. What option should I
In your case, assuming all the emails either from external MTAs or from
authenticated clients are hitting ASSP before being proxied to qMail
your
setup
> The default debian script has this functionality, that's no issue.
> What I'm saying is that, by the time AutoRestartCmd is triggered,
> the assp process is no longer running. If a kill step is included it
> just generates an error that there is nothing to kill, at least on
> Linux.
Well that
> What is the most reliable way to handle mail from a backup MTA in
> ASSP? I'd like to have our offsite MTA send mail to ASSP where it's
> filtered and sent downstream, but what is the best way to accomplish
> this without punishing the MTA? Or are people doing something
> different altogether?
> Sorry, hit send accidentally. It seems like assp is designed so that
> only a start command makes sense in AutoRestartCmd, but perhaps
> there's a point to including kill and pid-removal stages as well?
imHo yes; I mean, a restart script should take care of stopping assp,
waiting for it to co
> I am currently using a program called EFS http://www.chimera.co.nz/
> which works fine..don't know how it works
EFS is just a "pop3 retriever" all it does is use the supplied
informations (pop3 server, user, pass, smtp server) to fetch
emails from the POP3 server and forward them to the SMTP
on
> Okay, so I have unchecked "Run ASSP as a Daemon", removed the
> UID and GID so it is running as root, and I still cannot get ASSP to
> restart itself. I've tried leaving the AutoRestartCmd blank, and
> setting it to the following values:
>
> "/usr/bin/perl" "assp.pl" "/usr/share/assp" &
>
>> If ASSP runs as a daemon or a service ASSP cannot restart it.
exact; so, in case ASSP is running as a windows service it would
be a good idea to create a script like (e.g.)
@echo off
pushd c:\assp
if exist pid del pid
net start asspsmtp
popd
exit
and setup the service recovery action to "ru
1 - 100 of 451 matches
Mail list logo
