Re: [Assp-user] Feature Request - Remote Command Execution

2007-03-13 Thread Evans Martin
owser for IMail / SmarterMail -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Patrick Neill Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 2:27 PM To: assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Assp-user] Feature Request - Remote Command Execution Simply put the idea is abou

Re: [Assp-user] Feature Request - Remote Command Execution

2007-03-13 Thread Fritz Borgstedt
> >Simply put the idea is about: > >- telling ASSP to forward (proxy) incoming E-Mails to certain named >recipients to a different IP address and/or port You already understood, that ASSP is working as a synchronous proxy. It immediately connects a sender to the server. To do what you want, we

Re: [Assp-user] Feature Request - Remote Command Execution

2007-03-13 Thread Dean Woodward
Patrick Neill wrote: > - telling ASSP to forward (proxy) incoming E-Mails to certain named > recipients to a different IP address and/or port > > In a second step these sorted out E-Mails could then be used for whatever > purpose one sees fit. In my case they would trigger a program that starts a

Re: [Assp-user] Feature Request - Remote Command Execution

2007-03-13 Thread Patrick Neill
Simply put the idea is about: - telling ASSP to forward (proxy) incoming E-Mails to certain named recipients to a different IP address and/or port In a second step these sorted out E-Mails could then be used for whatever purpose one sees fit. In my case they would trigger a program that starts a

Re: [Assp-user] Feature Request - Remote Command Execution

2007-03-13 Thread Corwin Grey
So if I understand this thread correctly, the discussion is as follows: 1) ASSP is installed on a server which connects either Internet->LAN or Internet->DMZ 2) We want to give an application on this server the ability to execute remote commands based on (hopefully) sanitized input directly from

Re: [Assp-user] Feature Request - Remote Command Execution

2007-03-12 Thread Fritz Borgstedt
Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy schreibt: > >What is this good for? > >- normal e-mail would continue to pass through ASSP to the main >mailserver >(Exchange in my case) >- e-mail to special addresses (like [EMAIL PROTECTED]) would go >to my >secondary mailserver (Merc

Re: [Assp-user] Feature Request - Remote Command Execution

2007-03-12 Thread Dean Woodward
Patrick Neill wrote: > Fritz, that would forward any e-mails to a set of defined addresses > to a mailserver other than the main mailserver. I'm going to agree that this isn't a "spam-fighting" function What you want can be done in Exchange- or it could in 5.5, so I don't know why it still can't.

Re: [Assp-user] Feature Request - Remote Command Execution

2007-03-12 Thread Patrick Neill
Fritz, that would forward any e-mails to a set of defined addresses to a mailserver other than the main mailserver. What is this good for? - normal e-mail would continue to pass through ASSP to the main mailserver (Exchange in my case) - e-mail to special addresses (like [EMAIL PROTECTED]) would

Re: [Assp-user] Feature Request - Remote Command Execution

2007-03-12 Thread Greg Wright
gt; From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:assp-user- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Patrick Neill > Sent: Tuesday, 13 March 2007 9:18 AM > To: assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [Assp-user] Feature Request - Remote Command Execution > > > The SMTP Server option (Mercury Mai

Re: [Assp-user] Feature Request - Remote Command Execution

2007-03-12 Thread Fritz Borgstedt
>ASSP could also "Forward to these Recipients always", what exactly should this option do? fritz - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to sha

Re: [Assp-user] Feature Request - Remote Command Execution

2007-03-12 Thread Patrick Neill
The SMTP Server option (Mercury Mail) is what I am using right now. However I am forced to move the server to Exchange and have not yet found a way of doing command execution on receipt of an E-Mail in Exchange. Anyway, I noticed that ASSP has already got the Genes to a possible solution in the '

Re: [Assp-user] Feature Request - Remote Command Execution

2007-03-06 Thread TreeWalk
> I would suggest that you could do this by using a program to scan the > ASSP maillog file looking for the right keyword. You would need to > capture the date/time for the log entry and compare that against when > the last WOL email was received to ensure that the request isn't old. That may be a

Re: [Assp-user] Feature Request - Remote Command Execution

2007-03-05 Thread Greg Wright
rs for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy > Subject: Re: [Assp-user] Feature Request - Remote Command Execution > > I would suggest that you could do this by using a program to scan the > ASSP maillog file looking for the right keyword. You would need to > capture the date/time for

Re: [Assp-user] Feature Request - Remote Command Execution

2007-03-05 Thread Greg Wright
-Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:assp-user- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Patrick Neill > Sent: Tuesday, 6 March 2007 9:58 AM > To: assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: [Assp-user] Feature Request - Remote Command Execution > > > Ok, this m

Re: [Assp-user] Feature Request - Remote Command Execution

2007-03-05 Thread Kevin
Patrick Neill wrote: > Ok, this may not be directly related to killing Spam, but nevertheless useful > on a proxy. > > One of my current mailservers (Mercury Mail) allows me to execute a command > (batch file) if an e-mail is sent to a specific address. I use this for Wake > on Lan. Say I want to

[Assp-user] Feature Request - Remote Command Execution

2007-03-05 Thread Patrick Neill
Ok, this may not be directly related to killing Spam, but nevertheless useful on a proxy. One of my current mailservers (Mercury Mail) allows me to execute a command (batch file) if an e-mail is sent to a specific address. I use this for Wake on Lan. Say I want to turn on my PC at the office from