For Users of ASSP schreibt:
>funny, before reading this thread, I had the same thoughts and just
>made a suggestion to change the numbering schema a bit.
The version in ASSP is 8 digits, 4 are reserved for releases, 4 are
reserved for versions.
abcd - efgh
d - may be unused
c - is equal for deve
funny, before reading this thread, I had the same thoughts and just
made a suggestion to change the numbering schema a bit.
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 1:02 PM, Scott Haneda wrote:
> On Mar 11, 2010, at 1:21 PM, PMW-Troy wrote:
>
>> Scott,
>>
>> AFAIK, you cannot determine the release state based on
On Mar 11, 2010, at 1:21 PM, PMW-Troy wrote:
> Scott,
>
> AFAIK, you cannot determine the release state based on the version
> number. I'll yield to any of the developers, but I believe the latest
> release at SourceForge is the latest stable release regardless of
> version number. In this cas
Scott,
AFAIK, you cannot determine the release state based on the version
number. I'll yield to any of the developers, but I believe the latest
release at SourceForge is the latest stable release regardless of
version number. In this case, 1.7.1.1 is the latest stable release.
For the latest d
Hello ASSP users.
How do I tell the type of download that is listed at SF, if it is alpha, beta,
final, testing, etc, based on the version name?
If that is not possible, where can I go to get this information and know that
it is up to date. For example, if I only ever wanted to download officia
