Re: [Assp-user] Testmode confusion

2010-08-05 Thread Mark Edwards
On Aug 5, 2010, at 10:22 AM, Mark Edwards wrote: > On Aug 4, 2010, at 1:07 PM, Mark Edwards wrote: > >> No reply yet to this, so let me simplify... >> >> Why would a message that has Bayesian score of 1.0 and a total score of >> 44 be passed with no headers because of testmode, when the fol

Re: [Assp-user] Testmode confusion

2010-08-05 Thread Mark Edwards
On Aug 4, 2010, at 1:07 PM, Mark Edwards wrote: > No reply yet to this, so let me simplify... > > Why would a message that has Bayesian score of 1.0 and a total score of > 44 be passed with no headers because of testmode, when the following are set: > > baysTestMode: off > baysConf: 0 > bay

Re: [Assp-user] Testmode confusion

2010-08-04 Thread Mark Edwards
No reply yet to this, so let me simplify... Why would a message that has Bayesian score of 1.0 and a total score of 44 be passed with no headers because of testmode, when the following are set: baysTestMode: off baysConf: 0 baysProbability: 0.6 Relevant log line is: Jul-30-10 01:42:48 7936

[Assp-user] Testmode confusion

2010-08-02 Thread Mark Edwards
I have assp now set up to pass all spam through to the user after tagging it, using sendAllSpam: usern...@domain spamSubject: [FILTERED] I have an anomaly where a user received an email with the spamSubject tag yet it contained no assp headers and therefore did not go to their Junk folder. Th