On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 5:55 AM, Glenn Fowler wrote:
[snip]
> if the pattern did have a syntax error regcomp() would report it to the caller
> so reporting an error or not is not a regex issue
I know... see below...
> so it doesn't make sense to add something to ~(...) to check syntax
> because
Comments in line:
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 4:35 AM, ольга крыжановская
wrote:
> I already used testregex. Still no clue why it works there but fails in ksh.
>
> I've reworked the regex the expression below but it still does not
> capture name="value". Full script uploaded to
> http://pastebin.com/
On Sun, 24 Jun 2012 04:35:45 +0200 =?KOI8-R?B?z8zYx8Egy9LZ1sHOz9fTy8HR?= wrote:
> I already used testregex. Still no clue why it works there but fails in ksh.
it was a hint to post it :)
post the testregex test case(s) and I'll look at it
> I've reworked the regex the expression below but it st
How can I make ksh to pass exactly ONE back slash to _ast_regcomp()?
So far I tried it without success, either it passes 0 or 2 back
slashes to _ast_regex():
(dbx) run -c '[[ x1 == ~(E)\: ]]'
(dbx) print (char*)0xfd7fff0bd4f0
(char *) 18446741324914480368U = 0xfd7fff0bd4f0 "~(E):"
(dbx) r
I already used testregex. Still no clue why it works there but fails in ksh.
I've reworked the regex the expression below but it still does not
capture name="value". Full script uploaded to
http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=SPyqBMrj
dummy="${xmltext//~(Ex-p)(?:
()+?| # xml comments
(<
On Sat, 23 Jun 2012 21:27:58 -0400 Glenn Fowler wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Jun 2012 22:38:36 +0200 =?KOI8-R?B?z8zYx8Egy9LZ1sHOz9fTy8HR?=
> wrote:
> > I do not see a mistake in the regular expression itself. Either it's a
> > hard to spot quoting issue or a full bug in ksh93 or libast regex.
> > Glenn,
On Sat, 23 Jun 2012 22:38:36 +0200 =?KOI8-R?B?z8zYx8Egy9LZ1sHOz9fTy8HR?= wrote:
> I do not see a mistake in the regular expression itself. Either it's a
> hard to spot quoting issue or a full bug in ksh93 or libast regex.
> Glenn, what do you think?
to rule out any possible ksh quoting conflict
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 10:09 AM, Glenn Fowler wrote:
>
> On Sat, 23 Jun 2012 09:09:56 +0200 Lionel Cons wrote:
>> On 23 June 2012 06:22, Roland Mainz wrote:
>> > On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 5:55 AM, Glenn Fowler
>> > wrote:
>> >> On Sat, 23 Jun 2012 03:40:15 +0200 Roland Mainz wrote:
>> >>> On Sat
I have attached a debugger to ksh to see which pattern _ast_recomp will see
(dbx) print (char*)0xfd7fff0777b0
dbx: warning: unknown language, 'c' assumed
(char *) 18446741324914194352U = 0xfd7fff0777b0
"~(Ex)(?:\n^I()+?|^I# xml
comments\n^I(<[[:alnum:]_-:]+\n^I^I(?: #
attributes\n^I^I^I[[:s
I do not see a mistake in the regular expression itself. Either it's a
hard to spot quoting issue or a full bug in ksh93 or libast regex.
Glenn, what do you think?
Olga
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 9:08 AM, Lionel Cons
wrote:
> On 23 June 2012 06:40, Roland Mainz wrote:
>> On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 6
On Sat, 23 Jun 2012 09:09:56 +0200 Lionel Cons wrote:
> On 23 June 2012 06:22, Roland Mainz wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 5:55 AM, Glenn Fowler wrote:
> >> On Sat, 23 Jun 2012 03:40:15 +0200 Roland Mainz wrote:
> >>> On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 2:34 AM, Roland Mainz
> >>> wrote:
> >>> > Here'
On Sat, 23 Jun 2012 06:22:23 +0200 Roland Mainz wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 5:55 AM, Glenn Fowler wrote:
> > On Sat, 23 Jun 2012 03:40:15 +0200 Roland Mainz wrote:
> >> On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 2:34 AM, Roland Mainz
> >> wrote:
> >> > Here's another issue with regex. We wrote the following
On 23 June 2012 06:22, Roland Mainz wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 5:55 AM, Glenn Fowler wrote:
>> On Sat, 23 Jun 2012 03:40:15 +0200 Roland Mainz wrote:
>>> On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 2:34 AM, Roland Mainz
>>> wrote:
>>> > Here's another issue with regex. We wrote the following script to
>>> >
On 23 June 2012 06:40, Roland Mainz wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 6:22 AM, Roland Mainz
> wrote:
>> On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 5:55 AM, Glenn Fowler wrote:
>>> On Sat, 23 Jun 2012 03:40:15 +0200 Roland Mainz wrote:
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 2:34 AM, Roland Mainz
wrote:
> Here's a
On 22 June 2012 21:52, David Korn wrote:
> Subject: Re: [ast-developers] read: -N: limit exceeded
>
>
>> Why is this limit? And can the limit be increased to at least 2**32 on
>> 64bit platforms?
>>
>> Lionel
>>
>
> It was that way to reserve compatibility with the sh_readline()
> interac
15 matches
Mail list logo
