I'd rather train ksh/ast users to include ${.sh.version}/upstream-version in
bug reports
rather than train me to grok distro X version nomenclature
On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 18:32:22 +0200 Lionel Cons wrote:
> On 23 October 2012 15:20, Glenn Fowler wrote:
> >
> >>> Version: 93u+-1.1
> >
> > not sure
Subject: Re: [ast-developers] Fwd: Bug#691200: ksh: cd .. doesn't work in many
cases
This was a known problem with ksh93 2012-02-02 but is fixed in
the current release, 2012-08-01.
David Korn
d...@research.att.com
___
ast-developers ma
I notice this problem (cd is broken) on
Version JM 93u+ 2012-02-29
Linux version 3.2.0-3-amd64 (Debian 3.2.23-1) (
debian-ker...@lists.debian.org) (gcc version 4.6.3 (Debian 4.6.3-8) ) #1
SMP Mon Jul 23 02:45:17 UTC 2012
With the last Debian update ... the ksh version is still the same but now
i
On 23 October 2012 15:20, Glenn Fowler wrote:
>
>>> Version: 93u+-1.1
>
> not sure about this nomenclature
> ast ksh reports a version matching "93[a-z][-+]? -MM-DD"
These are Debian version numbers. Oliver Kiddle
can explain how they translate into ast/ksh version numbers.
Lionel
_
>> Version: 93u+-1.1
not sure about this nomenclature
ast ksh reports a version matching "93[a-z][-+]? -MM-DD"
On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 13:54:31 +0200 Cedric Blancher wrote:
> Just saw this. Is this a known issue?
> Ced
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Oliver Kiddle
> Date: 22
Just saw this. Is this a known issue?
Ced
-- Forwarded message --
From: Oliver Kiddle
Date: 22 October 2012 22:06
Subject: Bug#691200: ksh: cd .. doesn't work in many cases
To: sub...@bugs.debian.org
Package: ksh
Version: 93u+-1.1
Justification: renders package unusable
Severit
