Re: [ast-developers] Fwd: Bug#691200: ksh: cd .. doesn't work in many cases

2012-10-24 Thread Yves Crespin
I notice this problem (cd is broken) on Version JM 93u+ 2012-02-29 Linux version 3.2.0-3-amd64 (Debian 3.2.23-1) ( debian-ker...@lists.debian.org) (gcc version 4.6.3 (Debian 4.6.3-8) ) #1 SMP Mon Jul 23 02:45:17 UTC 2012 With the last Debian update ... the ksh version is still the same but now

Re: [ast-developers] Fwd: Bug#691200: ksh: cd .. doesn't work in many cases

2012-10-24 Thread David Korn
Subject: Re: [ast-developers] Fwd: Bug#691200: ksh: cd .. doesn't work in many cases This was a known problem with ksh93 2012-02-02 but is fixed in the current release, 2012-08-01. David Korn d...@research.att.com ___ ast-developers mailing

Re: [ast-developers] Fwd: Bug#691200: ksh: cd .. doesn't work in many cases

2012-10-24 Thread Glenn Fowler
I'd rather train ksh/ast users to include ${.sh.version}/upstream-version in bug reports rather than train me to grok distro X version nomenclature On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 18:32:22 +0200 Lionel Cons wrote: On 23 October 2012 15:20, Glenn Fowler g...@research.att.com wrote: Version: 93u+-1.1

Re: [ast-developers] Fwd: Bug#691200: ksh: cd .. doesn't work in many cases

2012-10-23 Thread Glenn Fowler
Version: 93u+-1.1 not sure about this nomenclature ast ksh reports a version matching 93[a-z][-+]? -MM-DD On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 13:54:31 +0200 Cedric Blancher wrote: Just saw this. Is this a known issue? Ced -- Forwarded message -- From: Oliver Kiddle

Re: [ast-developers] Fwd: Bug#691200: ksh: cd .. doesn't work in many cases

2012-10-23 Thread Lionel Cons
On 23 October 2012 15:20, Glenn Fowler g...@research.att.com wrote: Version: 93u+-1.1 not sure about this nomenclature ast ksh reports a version matching 93[a-z][-+]? -MM-DD These are Debian version numbers. Oliver Kiddle okid...@yahoo.co.uk can explain how they translate into ast/ksh