Peter Nixon wrote:
On Sunday 09 October 2005 00:56, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
Dinesh Nair wrote:
in this instance, it definitely would be safer for the freebsd folk to
use chan_woomera to provide h.323 functionality on asterisk as this is a
legal quagmire an open source project (freebsd in
On Tue, 2005-10-11 at 01:08 -0500, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
I am offering, in my official capacity, a possible extension to the
LICENSE file that would more clearly indicate the circumstances under
which the Asterisk trademark could be used or not used. Since I posted
that message, I have
Same question for Australia?
Regards
Mark
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of trixter
http://www.0xdecafbad.com
Sent: Tuesday, 11 October 2005 4:16 PM
To: Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-biz]
On 10/11/05 14:15 trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com said the following:
On a side note but vaguely related to this (licensing in general) does
digium charge EU patrons for the g.729 codec? I understand that digium
is in the US and that it can cause them problems if they dont charge,
there
On 10/11/05 14:08 Kevin P. Fleming said the following:
protect (as you already pointed out in another response) our trademark
and the license exceptions associated with it.
i can fully understand the need to protect the trademark, and this will go
a long way towards assuaging concerns about
On Tue, 2005-10-11 at 16:23 +1000, Mark Armstrong wrote:
Same question for Australia?
if softwre patents dont exist there, I would imagine that someone could
write a codec and release that from within those countries legally. It
should be on the person who downloads it to pay if required to
On Tue, 2005-10-11 at 14:32 +0800, Dinesh Nair wrote:
On 10/11/05 14:15 trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com said the following:
On a side note but vaguely related to this (licensing in general) does
digium charge EU patrons for the g.729 codec? I understand that digium
is in the US and that
On 10/11/05 14:29 Dinesh Nair said the following:
will not be able to be done if the source is modified, it kinda limits
significant modifications to the source when openh323 is not used. o
oops, that came out wrong. i meant it ALLOWS significant modifications to
the source ONLY when
trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com wrote:
On Tue, 2005-10-11 at 01:08 -0500, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
I am offering, in my official capacity, a possible extension to the
LICENSE file that would more clearly indicate the circumstances under
which the Asterisk trademark could be used or not used.
On Tue, 2005-10-11 at 22:46 +1300, Matt Riddell wrote:
Eh?!
So you think that France Telecom hasn't assigned SipPro to handle the
licencing for Europe?
What specifically are they gonna license? That specific code or the
g.729 codec itself? Were software patents in the EU recently voted
Hi folks,
If anyone can help with the above, please contact me.
Thanks,
Simon
--
http://www.esms.com
___
Asterisk-Biz mailing list
Asterisk-Biz@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz
trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com wrote:
Yes I understand that there would need to be two versions *or* digium
gives free licenses to people who can be verified in places where
software patents dont exist. However becuase digium is in a place where
they do I bet that it would be legally
trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com wrote:
On Tue, 2005-10-11 at 22:46 +1300, Matt Riddell wrote:
Eh?!
So you think that France Telecom hasn't assigned SipPro to handle the
licencing for Europe?
What specifically are they gonna license? That specific code or the
g.729 codec itself? Were
On Tue, 2005-10-11 at 09:29 -0500, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com wrote:
Yes I understand that there would need to be two versions *or* digium
gives free licenses to people who can be verified in places where
software patents dont exist. However becuase digium
We have the following products in stock.
Polycom IP 301 $115
Polycom IP 501 $175
Polycom IP 600 $245
Polycom IP 601 $249 (on order, reserve yours today)
We accept Visa, MasterCard, Discover, or Paypal.
Will ship worldwide.
Domestic rates
1 unit $20
each additional unit $5
Will work deals on
Does anyone knows if asterisk can support Abys interface on one side and
an IP link on the other.
Or if not supported may it be implemented in the roadmap of the product?
regards
___
Asterisk-Biz mailing list
Asterisk-Biz@lists.digium.com
Sirs,
I am sellingour direct route to Bangladesh (BD) Mobile (8801) for Call Termination.
Our Technical information ** *** Gateway : CISCOGateway Bands: E1 Capacity : 12.5 Million minutes per month Codec used : G723 /
G729.1 Signalization GW :
Not having 2 switched ports is a big minus IMHO but you can't have
everything I guess.
-Original Message-
From: Cory Andrews [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 8:21 AM
To: Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion
Subject: [Asterisk-biz] SPA-941 Pics
If it's a senior executive they you would probably be using a Cisco phone.
-Original Message-
From: Dinesh Nair [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 8:39 PM
To: Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-biz] SPA-941 Pics
There will be a dual ethernet version, it's coming, it will be the
SPA-942. They are also planning PoE capable units.
Cory J Andrews
Partner / Purchasing
+++
VOIPSupply.com - Everything you need for VOIP
454 Sonwil Drive
Buffalo, NY 14225
+++
tf voice - 800-398-VOIP X22
Color screen, POE and 2 ports Ethernet is plan for this year.
We will have stock as soon as avaible for Europe. If somebody
interrested, please contact me offlist.
canuck15 wrote:
Not having 2 switched ports is a big minus IMHO but you can't have
everything I guess.
-Original
trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com wrote:
What specifically are they gonna license? That specific code or the
g.729 codec itself? Were software patents in the EU recently voted to
be invalid? That means that they can license a specific bit of code but
not the method for that code, which
Hi,
Can anybody help with this? Or at least point me in the right direction?
--
Cheers,
Matt Riddell
___
http://www.sineapps.com/news.php (Daily Asterisk News - html)
http://www.sineapps.com/rssfeed.php (Daily Asterisk News - rss)
Matt,
If you get any info on it, please feel the urge to share ,)
/Danny
Matt Riddell wrote:
Hi,
Can anybody help with this? Or at least point me in the right direction?
___
Asterisk-Biz mailing list
Asterisk-Biz@lists.digium.com
On Wed, 2005-10-12 at 16:47 +1300, Matt Riddell wrote:
trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com wrote:
What specifically are they gonna license? That specific code or the
g.729 codec itself? Were software patents in the EU recently voted to
be invalid? That means that they can license a
Sorry to be dense... Why would you use this instead of an lcr script?
Darren Wiebe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com wrote:
I spent the last day or so gathering every country plan and listing
prefixes as mobile, premium, etc. If anyone wants this I have made it
available
Matt Riddell wrote:
trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com wrote:
What specifically are they gonna license? That specific code or the
g.729 codec itself? Were software patents in the EU recently voted to
be invalid? That means that they can license a specific bit of code but
not the method
On Tue, 2005-10-11 at 23:04 -0600, Darren Wiebe wrote:
Sorry to be dense... Why would you use this instead of an lcr script?
Darren Wiebe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I said on my webpage that lcr and realtime stuff would be better for
enterprise stuff. For some people, especially home users, this
On Wed, 2005-10-12 at 01:13 -0400, Paul wrote:
Suppose I discover a much better method of balancing the checkbook. It
is such a great improvement over well-known methods that I truly deserve
the patent I get for it.
That means I can prevent you from using the method with pencil and
trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com wrote:
question, thus my comments about a 3rd party writing a compliant codec)
Let's assume that the algorithm used really deserved a patent. If you
can come up with a different algorithm that will properly interact with
a device using their algorithm,
I gotcha. Thanks. Hey if you are interested in LCR code I can show you
what I have. It's easy to setup but requires a running mysql install.
Darren
trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com wrote:
On Tue, 2005-10-11 at 23:04 -0600, Darren Wiebe wrote:
Sorry to be dense... Why would you use
trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com wrote:
On Wed, 2005-10-12 at 01:13 -0400, Paul wrote:
I really don't see how any government can afford to properly evaluate
patent applications with the fees they collect. They charge the same fee
for salad spinners and codecs.
And you get about
Interesting news because it mentions the google messenger and voice services.
Microsoft, Yahoo to link IM services - Yahoo! News
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20051012/bs_nm/microsoft_yahoo_dc
___
Asterisk-Biz mailing list
Asterisk-Biz@lists.digium.com
On Wed, 2005-10-12 at 01:25 -0400, Paul wrote:
trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com wrote:
question, thus my comments about a 3rd party writing a compliant codec)
Let's assume that the algorithm used really deserved a patent. If you
can come up with a different algorithm that will
On Tue, 2005-10-11 at 23:28 -0600, Darren Wiebe wrote:
I gotcha. Thanks. Hey if you are interested in LCR code I can show you
what I have. It's easy to setup but requires a running mysql install.
Darren
post a url if not me then maybe someone else wants it, maybe both, who
knows :P
--
On Wed, 2005-10-12 at 01:32 -0400, Paul wrote:
Funny thing is how you see patent numbers and patent pending on a lot of
simple one-piece plastic items. I look those new ice cube trays and
laundry baskets over carefully and never find anything obviously innovative.
most of those are
36 matches
Mail list logo
