Well Gregory, the reason they don't just jump is
1.) Fat start-up cost and non-stable pricing .. we've seen Dash911
almost quadruple their start-up fee, and increase the monthly price at
least 3 times since service was announced.
2.) The questionable service reliability. All the dash911
Whose your PRI with, if the price is right and you're not with a reseller, id be interested in renting the actual pri from you for a monthly no contract rate.--ShidanOn 3/7/06,
Jon Weisman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anybody need Toronto DID's? I've got a PRI looking to sell on a monthlybasis
On Tuesday 07 March 2006 23:15, Mark wrote:
There is really no reason in
most cases to pass the media through an asterisk box, unless you need to
transcode it.
Hi
Sorry for the newb question but what exactly do you mean by this?
--
Cheers
Wayne
___
This seemed relevant on this thread so I thought I would share..
http://news.zdnet.com/2100-1035_22-6047054.html
Net phone providers describe E911 obstacles
We have a long way to go to get the rest of our customers done, said
Maureen Napolitano, director of E911 customer service for Verizon
If
Discussion...is VoIP really ready for serious business use.
So...are we alone. Is it possible to get VoIP LD to be as good as TDM 95%
of the time, and if so how? We dont have the time to try calls with every
carrier to every area code every day!
(and please, no responses from VoIPjet,
On Tue, 2006-03-07 at 11:26 -0700, Gregory Giagnocavo wrote:
What I don't understand is why every VoIP provider wouldn't jump at the
opportunity to sign up and offer 911 services to their subscribers. The FCC
requires it, the subscribers want it, and subscribers will pay the $1.50 that
it
Hello,
Anyone have DIDs in 805, Ventura,
CA?
--
Richard Cook
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
T: 705-223-2000 ext
2010
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
asterisk-biz mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
I think VoIP will be ready for serious business use only if the voip
provider can control the whole path of the call before it hits the PSTN.
For us we spent the last year getting our network ready to deploy voip. Like
everyone else we started out thinking big and tested everyone's
Voip Xpress wrote:
Discussion...is VoIP really ready for serious business use.
We have been installing Asterisk for customers for about a year now,
and we are beginning to wonder if parts of VoIP are really ready for
serious business. Long Distance in particular is a problem.
I'm not sure
On Tue, 2006-03-07 at 15:21 -0500, Steve Totaro wrote:
This is a great and honest email. I am looking forward to the replies.
My thoughts are VoIP is ready for serious business on the LAN and point
to point links.
I think VoIP, open source VoIP and Asterisk have a lot to offer.
Despite all
An add on , most sucking LD providers offer 30/6 billing with lots of 1-2
sec calls , customer is unhappy besides you can even lose money due to
minimum 30 secs in the case you bill your customers 1-1 just with the idea
of being fair.
Regarding quality , the result is sometimes same with %10-20
On 3/7/06, Tim Booth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree with you completely. It sound like there are loop holes and many
Wrong, these are not loop holes but what the FCC intended.
providers can call their solution compliant. Personally speaking my
Again, wrong, you should have said: 'many
We have been installing Asterisk for customers for about a year now, and we
are beginning to wonder if parts of VoIP are really ready for serious
business.
Aside from carrier network problems, the real question in my mind is,
do you want to compare voIP with cellphone quality or twisted pair
On Tue, 7 Mar 2006, Steve Totaro wrote:
This is a great and honest email. I am looking forward to the replies.
My thoughts are VoIP is ready for serious business on the LAN and point
to point links.
Thanks,
Steve Totaro
Yep.. I make two distinctions when I do my Deploying Asterisk for
On Fri, 2005-10-21 at 19:28 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I beg to differ. Channel banks are a dime a dozen (500$ ish), quad cards
are 1500$ish list, complete setup 500*9+1500*3=9000$. Replacing phones
with IP phones is at least 125$ for not-completely-ghetto-phone each -
meaning at
On Tuesday 07 March 2006 16:15, Mark wrote:
Thirdly, I may well be flamed for this next part, however PART of the
problem MAY be Asterisk! Asterisk favors Native bridging unless
explicitly forced to do otherwise. After having worked with a variety of
media types over more thanb 25 years, I
First of all I'm not asking you to promote my company, we sell service
to our existing clients and that's fine for us now. I like knowing that
if my clients pick up their line and has to dial 911 it's going to work.
Fumbling around for the extra 30 seconds to make sure you're on a POTS
line could
Ever tried to call an international cellphone from a regular Verizon
phone? Chances are you get: dropped calls, echo, dead connections,
[insert your favorite problem]... putting two or three VoIP 'carriers'
into the equation makes things even worse. Like others pointed out it's
all about the
I tend to agree. VoIP to VoIP to VoIP is just a pain in the ass. There
will be lots of problems and no way to determine whose problem it is.
Get T1's in your facility and terminate calls on them.
VoIP is only as good as the network that it runs on. A lot of carriers
just resell the services
Sokol Associates in cooperation with Digium are proud to introduce
SkiCAP. Join us in beautiful Keystone, Colorado for three days of
Asterisk and skiing. SkiCAP is a three-day test preparation course
with the option of taking the dCAP on the fourth day. SkiCAP will be
held from April 5 - 7, 2006
There is really no reason in
most cases to pass the media through an asterisk box, unless you need to
transcode it.
Hi
Sorry for the newb question but what exactly do you mean by this?
The media stream (or media path) refers to the audio passed between
phones, Asterisk, and a service. This
-biz
__ NOD32 1.1435 (20060308) Information __
This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
http://www.eset.com
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
asterisk-biz mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Wayne Gemmell
Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 2:49 AM
To: Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-biz] Does VoIP Really Work for Serious
Business?
On Tuesday 07
Yes, loads of 'em.
https://www.teliax.com/newaccount/?step=2st_name=Californiast=CAnpa=805c
ity=VNTRA%20CNTL
Thanks!
David
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard Cook
Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006 5:55 PM
To:
trixter aka Bret McDanel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think it was very wrong for the FCC to mandate that voip providers
have to provide a specific service that relies on other companies (LECs)
but not mandate that the other companies provide that service. It has
to be a two way street.
The companies
List,
Im looking for hardware vendor references. I need a Xorcom Astribank-8.
If you can provide this piece of hardware, or know an organization that can,
please refer me to them. I may have a need to purchase approximately 100
units over the next 2-6 months.
I am located in Los Angeles,
Does anyone know of any wireless VOIP phones that can do encryption between the two people having a conversation? Anyone know if the new Linksys WIP330 is suppose to do it, and if anyone has any of them for sale yet.
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation
With the discussion of the 1.50 per subscriber fee, Which Dash911 says
customers are happy to pay... Lets not forget the State funding fees.
I know that 45 of the 50 states collect fees from providers to support
answering those telephone calls for 911. Those fees need to be collected
as
I have to disagree somewhat. Echo is inherently a BIGGER problem with VoIP
PBX. Mostly because of larger delays. This article is what clued me in on
it. The bottom line is you really need to use hardware echo cancellers for
VoIP PBX's if you want to be sure you won't have echo problems.
Junction Networks here. We have 805 area code dids available for immediate provisioning.
www.junctionnetworks.com
Regards,
Rob Wolpov
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard Cook
Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006 7:55
PM
To:
On Tue, 2006-03-07 at 18:56 -0500, C F wrote:
On 3/7/06, Tim Booth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree with you completely. It sound like there are loop
holes and many
Wrong, these are not loop holes but what the FCC intended.
The speed limit signs say maximum speed 55 around here, so I
On 3/8/06, Tim Booth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First of all I'm not asking you to promote my company, we sell service
to our existing clients and that's fine for us now. I like knowing that
if my clients pick up their line and has to dial 911 it's going to work.
Well thats not what you wrote in
If you have to ask, then it's time you hire a shopper.
On 3/8/06, Herman Webley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2005-10-21 at 19:28 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I beg to differ. Channel banks are a dime a dozen (500$ ish), quad cards
are 1500$ish list, complete setup 500*9+1500*3=9000$.
I'm interested if anyone has any tunneling solutions that support high
compression and how well they work in conjunction with voip..
I'm most interested in answers for the following..
1) How does your product compare to the open source competition?
2) What sort of latency/compression ration
On Wed, 2006-03-08 at 08:57 -0500, Tim Booth wrote:
First of all I'm not asking you to promote my company, we sell service
to our existing clients and that's fine for us now. I like knowing that
if my clients pick up their line and has to dial 911 it's going to work.
Fumbling around for the
http://blogs.zdnet.com/ip-telephony/?p=955
VoIPE911 challenges: and the Master Street Address Guide
ZDNet - USA
If you think that VoIP E911 is here, and that most of the problems
have been solved, you really need to read my colleague Anne Broache's
piece entitled Net ...
And yet another one,
We are looking to hire a full time person to manage our voice/data
network with locations in the US as well as various places in Iraq.
All corporate telephony is done with asterisk on Linux machines.
This position would be in our headquarters in Herndon, VA. More
information is
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 08:43:57AM -0500, Herman Webley wrote:
On Fri, 2005-10-21 at 19:28 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I beg to differ. Channel banks are a dime a dozen (500$ ish), quad cards
are 1500$ish list, complete setup 500*9+1500*3=9000$. Replacing phones
with IP phones is at
Waldo,
http://www.theivrvoice.com/
/ed
Waldo Rubinstein wrote:
Can anyone recommend a company that does professional Asterisk
recordings for things like IVR, greetings, MOH, announcements, etc?
Thanks,
Waldo
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation
http://www.mikesullivan.com/
http://thevoice.digium.com/
On Wed, 8 Mar 2006, Waldo Rubinstein wrote:
Can anyone recommend a company that does professional Asterisk recordings for
things like IVR, greetings, MOH, announcements, etc?
___
--Bandwidth
Looking for a volunteer willing to do some testing
on a T1/E1/PRI card which has been developed by Rhino, the company who
manufactures the popular Rhino Channel Banks. I have a demo unit I would
like to give away to someone who is willing to spend some time with it, and
document integration
Zafer,
We have an ITSP product all ready to go. For more details, please see:
http://integrics.com/products/itsp/
An online demo is at:
http://itsp.demo.integrics.com/?username=guest;password=guest
and a feature list is at:
Hi,
Sorry for crowding your in-box with this age old but in demand query. (It is a deja vu, Neo )
We need about 30 to 60 nos of reliable (99.99%) DIDs in major metro cities of USA. This is needed for our upcoming calling card operation segment. Naturally, for these DIDS, I would need unlimited
Hi Cory,
We have ordered for our PRI line here in India, and we would be
interested to do this testing for you.
we have already tested the Indian E1 PRI's on Digium and Sangoma cards,
but as system integrators, we are also looking out for different
products which we can offer to our
44 matches
Mail list logo
