Re: Self-appointed list moderators was:[asterisk-biz] full-featured IP-PBX

Justy wrote: > HI Guys, > > First time on this list, and I'm looking for an informative Newsletter > about Asterisk. Maybe you are new to mailing lists in general? > > Can we stop the bickering and move on? People already asked that the thread be killed. I guess you don't respect their wish

RE: [asterisk-biz] Suggestion for an Asterisk Product/Service Database

Several interesting thoughts in your comments: First unlike the proprietary IP-PBX vendors, most of the companies doing Asterisk development are smaller. That's both a blessing and a curse. Blessing, because they can be as innovative as they want, and the platform allows - which is pretty innovat

Re: [asterisk-biz] Suggestion for an Asterisk Product / Service Database

I concur, great suggestion from peter. Otherwise we will lose readers of this newsletter, and they will go elsewhere. Justin On 12/7/06, Gmail - PC <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I've been following this group for a while. I joined because I believe that Asterisk, and the development community

Re: [asterisk-biz] full-featured IP-PBX

HI Guys, First time on this list, and I'm looking for an informative Newsletter about Asterisk. Can we stop the bickering and move on? If one wants to argue with someone specific, email that person specifically, if one can't do that, ask for their email, and then proceed. I don't think the com

Re: [asterisk-biz] Suggestion for an Asterisk Product / Service Database

It is the market that creates the products and services, and it is the market that eventually defines the outcome of a technology. Uniquivocally, the best choice is always taken. I Don't think Digium, as good a company as it may be, should bear any responsibilities on product direction. W

Re: [asterisk-biz] Suggestion for an Asterisk Product / Service Database

Gmail - PC wrote: I’ve been following this group for a while. I joined because I believe that Asterisk, and the development community, needs to develop a detailed understanding of the customer and their needs if it is going to deliver on the full promise of open-source telephony. It is deep custo

[asterisk-biz] OT Lucent, AT&T Definity Phones for Sale

Black - Lucent 8434DX  13 units Tan/Beige  Lucent 8434DX  7 units Black  AT&T 8434DX  2 units Black  Lucent 8410D  1 unit Tan/Beige  Lucent 8410  32 units Black  AT&T 8410D  3 units Tan/Beige  Lucent 6408D+ - 23 unit Black  Polycom 501  1 unit Total Phones  units All used, not per

[asterisk-biz] DID in North Carolina (919) area code

Hello, I am Looking for DIDs in the 919 area code (NC). Flat rate incoming calls. Thanks ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-biz mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/lis

[asterisk-biz] Suggestion for an Asterisk Product / Service Database

I’ve been following this group for a while. I joined because I believe that Asterisk, and the development community, needs to develop a detailed understanding of the customer and their needs if it is going to deliver on the full promise of open-source telephony. It is deep customer understanding th

RE: [asterisk-biz] headset voip phone

No softphones, audio quality is dependent of the computer load... Greg > -Message d'origine- > De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-biz- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de John Schmerold > Envoyé : mercredi 6 décembre 2006 18:07 > À : asterisk-biz@lists.digium.com > Objet : Re: [aste

[asterisk-biz] Need India termination

Hi all I 'm looking for Termination in boh Land line & cell phones. If anyone out there can give me a good rates will be appritiated. send me emails to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank Kcard - Find out what India is tal

Re: [asterisk-biz] headset voip phone

How about a Bluetooth headset with SIP client running on the computer. There are a number of BT USB adapters to BT enable your computer. John Schmerold Katy Computer & Wireless 347 Clarkson Rd Ellisville MO 63011 636-861-6900 v 775-227-6947 f [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For a use in a call c

OT: Re: [asterisk-biz] full-featured IP-PBX

Paul wrote: *snipped A growing number of people think I am right on this issue. However a growing number of other people think I am a fool. actually, i think you both have beaten this to death. seems obvious that he is not going to tell you 'a number', so can you guys take this off list?

Re: [asterisk-biz] Hong Kong / Singapore / Malaysia

While you're there, are you going to reply to my posting on *-users about your 'VoIP GSM Gateway' that isn't one? On 06/12/06, Sam Tam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: We got the HK DID if you need it . Sam -Original Message- From: Sahil Gupta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, Decemb

RE: [asterisk-biz] Hong Kong / Singapore / Malaysia

We got the HK DID if you need it . Sam -Original Message- From: Sahil Gupta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2006 10:23 PM To: asterisk-biz@lists.digium.com Subject: [asterisk-biz] Hong Kong / Singapore / Malaysia Hi, We require DIDs for Hong Kong / Singapore / Mal

[asterisk-biz] Hong Kong / Singapore / Malaysia

Hi, We require DIDs for Hong Kong / Singapore / Malaysia. I need to deal directly with the person that runs the Primary Rates in each of these countries. So, if you buy off somebody else, please don't contact me. Cheers! Regards, Sahil Gupta VoiceValley ___

RE: [asterisk-biz] full-featured IP-PBX

Anton wrote: > Guys, > > Is PBXware/switchware based on the asterisk or it's fully different > stuff? > It is based on asterisk. Senad ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-biz mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update

[asterisk-biz] headset voip phone

Hello, For a use in a call center, I'm searching for a voip phone that is a headset phone, and only a headset. And if possible, with an auto answering switch. Thanks Greg ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-biz m

Re: [asterisk-biz] full-featured IP-PBX

Guys, Is PBXware/switchware based on the asterisk or it's fully different stuff? On 6 December 2006 18:37, Senad Jordanovic wrote: > >> If you wish to shoot your self into the foot as a > >> consultant, sure go ahead. > >> > >> If you wish to find out how many Tribox installations > >> migrated

RE: [asterisk-biz] full-featured IP-PBX

Michael Jerris wrote: > Senad and Paul, No one else cares about your "who can have the last > word" contest. Take it off list. Agree :) Senad ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-biz mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or u

RE: [asterisk-biz] full-featured IP-PBX

Senad and Paul, No one else cares about your "who can have the last word" contest. Take it off list. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-biz- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Senad Jordanovic > Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2006 8:37 AM > To: 'Commercial and Bu

RE: [asterisk-biz] full-featured IP-PBX

>> If you wish to shoot your self into the foot as a consultant, sure >> go ahead. >> >> If you wish to find out how many Tribox installations migrated to >> PBXware, our Investors and management do not allow exact figure to >> be publicly available. >> >> >> > That's all very nice and fuzzy

Re: [asterisk-biz] full-featured IP-PBX

Senad Jordanovic wrote: So try to be more specific: Slightly less than many many. Exactly many many. Slightly more than many many. >>>Well... Happy Christmas ... Or rather shall I say "Happy Guessing" >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>How ab

RE: [asterisk-biz] full-featured IP-PBX

>>> So try to be more specific: >>> >>> Slightly less than many many. >>> >>> Exactly many many. >>> >>> Slightly more than many many. >>> >>> >> >> Well... Happy Christmas ... Or rather shall I say "Happy Guessing" >> >> >> >> > How about I use that terminology to procure work for mysel

Re: [asterisk-biz] full-featured IP-PBX

Senad Jordanovic wrote: >Paul wrote: > > >>Jean-Michel Hiver wrote: >> >> >> >2) If you post a troll, it is advisable to back up your statements >with facts. "MANY MANY" switchers is not a fact. > > You want a figure? WHY? Could it be that it has IMPORTANCE for

RE: [asterisk-biz] full-featured IP-PBX

Paul wrote: > Jean-Michel Hiver wrote: > >> 2) If you post a troll, it is advisable to back up your statements with facts. "MANY MANY" switchers is not a fact. >>> >>> >>> You want a figure? WHY? Could it be that it has IMPORTANCE for YOU >>> specifically? >>> >>> >> Because "many

Re: [asterisk-biz] full-featured IP-PBX

Jean-Michel Hiver wrote: > >>> 2) If you post a troll, it is advisable to back up your statements >>> with facts. "MANY MANY" switchers is not a fact. >> >> >> You want a figure? WHY? Could it be that it has IMPORTANCE for YOU >> specifically? >> >> > Because "many many" doesn't mean anythin

Re: [asterisk-biz] full-featured IP-PBX

2) If you post a troll, it is advisable to back up your statements with facts. "MANY MANY" switchers is not a fact. You want a figure? WHY? Could it be that it has IMPORTANCE for YOU specifically? Because "many many" doesn't mean anything. Cheers, Jean-Michel. _

RE: [asterisk-biz] full-featured IP-PBX

Please look at EdgeBOX (www.edgebox.net and http://www.edgebox.net/opencms/opencms/resources.html.) using Asterisk with QoS. EdgeBOX is office-in-a-box SW runs on a COTS. All updates are done remotely by Critical Links (www.critical-links.com