Re: [asterisk-biz] DIDX Query (Dan Journo)

2010-11-05 Thread Steve Totaro
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 4:04 PM, Max Glucksmann wrote: > Hello Steve, > > Just wanted to make my employment status clear. I don't receive wages from > DIDx net, neither have signed an employment agreement with them. We just > have Interop Agreements as DID Buyers and DID Sellers. I'm happily workin

Re: [asterisk-biz] Porting (was DIDX Query)

2010-11-05 Thread Rick Orford
Assuming the back end clecs/ilecs cooperate, and assuming the "out provider" doesn't reject the port out for whatever reason, we usually get ports completed within a week. -- Regards, Rick Orford, CEO ComCanada Communications Inc. www.comcanada.ca Tel/Fax: (604) 998-4500 x6008 On Fri, Nov 5,

Re: [asterisk-biz] Porting (was DIDX Query)

2010-11-05 Thread Bruce B
Does anyone know the real port time for Canadian providers? On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 4:30 PM, Jake Hansen wrote: > Rumor has it that next FEB, carriers will be required to have the same 4 > hour port time that you get with cell phones now.. I have been talking > to our sales reps at different carr

Re: [asterisk-biz] Porting (was DIDX Query)

2010-11-05 Thread Jake Hansen
Rumor has it that next FEB, carriers will be required to have the same 4 hour port time that you get with cell phones now.. I have been talking to our sales reps at different carriers about this. ITs going to be amazing... On 11/5/2010 12:47 PM, Don Kelly wrote: > Top posting, 'cause that's all

Re: [asterisk-biz] Porting (was DIDX Query)

2010-11-05 Thread Steve Poirier
I Agree, porting is time consuming. We've 2 full time employees exclusively for LNP. So, I would say that "everyone in the business knows that porting cost money and is time consuming, hence the porting fees". __ Steve Poirier On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 1:47 PM, Don Kelly wrote: > Top posting, '

Re: [asterisk-biz] DIDX Query (Dan Journo)

2010-11-05 Thread Max Glucksmann
Hello Steve, Just wanted to make my employment status clear. I don't receive wages from DIDx net, neither have signed an employment agreement with them. We just have Interop Agreements as DID Buyers and DID Sellers. I'm happily working at Comtel Networks in FL (Fort Lauderdale, you're invited to s

[asterisk-biz] Porting (was DIDX Query)

2010-11-05 Thread Don Kelly
Top posting, 'cause that's all I know how to do and I actually prefer it. You say porting can't keep people busy... I find porting very time-consuming, and admire the wireless industry's "instant" porting. Do you know some way to simplify and speed up landline porting? --Don Don Kelly PCF Cor

Re: [asterisk-biz] DIDX Query (Dan Journo)

2010-11-05 Thread Steve Totaro
Apologies for the top post. I am not going to go through all of your points because you basically wrote off everything except the web design and speed. No need to thank me for my service, I am a DoD Contractor. I do it for the money. Expats, especially shooters and IT folks make about $600 a da

Re: [asterisk-biz] DIDX Query (Dan Journo)

2010-11-05 Thread Peter Beckman
On Fri, 5 Nov 2010, Suzanne Bowen wrote: 4. Regarding the message from Peter Beckman on beckman at angryox.com on Thu Nov 4 14:08:11 CDT 2010 ... “Their site is slow and awful, the design is bad and not well thought out, their API is useless for actually finding and purchasing DIDs, and the 50 D

Re: [asterisk-biz] Didx loves you !!

2010-11-05 Thread Brooks Bridges
*raises hand* "guilty!" (although it's usually barrens chat, heh) Jake Hansen wrote: This list is more entertaining then trolling in trade chat... ...anyone...? (world of warcraft joke...) On 11/5/2010 6:00 AM, Brooks Bridges wrote: "B-B-B-BUT DAD HE'S TOUCHING MEEE" lol

Re: [asterisk-biz] DIDX Query

2010-11-05 Thread Peter Beckman
On Fri, 5 Nov 2010, SIP wrote: > On 11/4/10 1:13 PM, Fred Posner wrote: >> On Nov 4, 2010, at 12:53 PM, Jai Rangi wrote: >> >>> Vitelity is too expensive. That's why we have been very busy in porting >>> number from Vitelity to didforsale.com >> Wow. You work for didforsale.com... if you're going

Re: [asterisk-biz] Didx loves you !!

2010-11-05 Thread Jake Hansen
This list is more entertaining then trolling in trade chat... ...anyone...? (world of warcraft joke...) On 11/5/2010 6:00 AM, Brooks Bridges wrote: > "B-B-B-BUT DAD HE'S TOUCHING MEEE" > > lol... sorry, I couldn't resist. > > Watching these last couple of days reminds me of listen

Re: [asterisk-biz] DIDX Query

2010-11-05 Thread Alex Balashov
On 11/05/2010 10:09 AM, Jared Geiger wrote: > > > On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 1:44 AM, Alex Balashov > wrote: > > On 11/05/2010 01:04 AM, Peter Beckman wrote: > > >Unlimited does not exist. We all know that no company can offer > >unlimited. > >

Re: [asterisk-biz] DIDX Query

2010-11-05 Thread Jared Geiger
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 1:44 AM, Alex Balashov wrote: > On 11/05/2010 01:04 AM, Peter Beckman wrote: > > >Unlimited does not exist. We all know that no company can offer > >unlimited. > > > There is a major CLEC owned by an ILEC in the US that offers unlimited channels/minutes inbound for

Re: [asterisk-biz] DIDX Query (Dan Journo)

2010-11-05 Thread Alex Balashov
On 11/05/2010 09:20 AM, Suzanne Bowen wrote: > 8. Regarding Alex Balashov abalashov at evaristesys.com > 's remarks on Thu Nov 4 13:56:19 CDT 2010 > including the following ... > "The debasement, cultural Third Worldisation, and used car salesmanship > of the VoIP originati

Re: [asterisk-biz] DIDX Query (Dan Journo)

2010-11-05 Thread Suzanne Bowen
Just finished studying every item regarding Dan's DIDX Query on whether or not buying 50 USA DIDs at $.15 per month would satisfy the 50 minimum DID quantity fee on DIDX. Follow-ups: 1. Yes, that math is correct. Dan is a valued customer, and I will call him to learn more about his company and how

Re: [asterisk-biz] Didx loves you !!

2010-11-05 Thread Steve Poirier
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 5:00 AM, re...@supertec.com wrote: > > But in the same 5 years my company managed to get from a few to 50 full time > guys, recognized by the worlds best people around the world taking revenue > from nothing to 6 figure + in usd, and yes maybe we are not the perfect > com

Re: [asterisk-biz] Didx loves you !!

2010-11-05 Thread Brooks Bridges
"B-B-B-BUT DAD HE'S TOUCHING MEEE" lol... sorry, I couldn't resist. Watching these last couple of days reminds me of listening to my 2 daughters when they're bickering at each other for days on end about stupid stuff. Certainly tells me who I *don't* want to do *any* business

Re: [asterisk-biz] Didx loves you !!

2010-11-05 Thread David Cunningham
Much as I hate to add to this thread, I totally agree with Paulo. Can we please stop the bickering, it makes everyone involved and asterisk-biz look really bad. On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 12:06 PM, Paulo Mannheimer wrote: > Is this a biz list or a bashing list? > > With all due respect, I've seen 20

Re: [asterisk-biz] DIDX Query

2010-11-05 Thread Fred Posner
On Nov 5, 2010, at 7:54 AM, SIP wrote: > On 11/4/10 1:13 PM, Fred Posner wrote: >> On Nov 4, 2010, at 12:53 PM, Jai Rangi wrote: >> >>> Vitelity is too expensive. That's why we have been very busy in porting >>> number from Vitelity to didforsale.com >> Wow. You work for didforsale.com... if you

Re: [asterisk-biz] Didx loves you !!

2010-11-05 Thread Paulo Mannheimer
Is this a biz list or a bashing list? With all due respect, I've seen 200 emails in the last 24 hours on this thread, but no real business or transaction happening. I guess this is why sometimes we find open source based products difficult to sell - sometimes the community just doesn't act like

Re: [asterisk-biz] DIDX Query

2010-11-05 Thread SIP
On 11/4/10 3:10 PM, Peter Beckman wrote: > On Thu, 4 Nov 2010, Steve Totaro wrote: > >> Junction is comparatively expensive, it is also rock solid and run >> like a real telco. Phone number for immediate support, reasonable >> wait times, quick resolutions. I think the product that they supply >>

Re: [asterisk-biz] DIDX Query

2010-11-05 Thread SIP
On 11/4/10 1:13 PM, Fred Posner wrote: > On Nov 4, 2010, at 12:53 PM, Jai Rangi wrote: > >> Vitelity is too expensive. That's why we have been very busy in porting >> number from Vitelity to didforsale.com > Wow. You work for didforsale.com... if you're going to post something like > that, you sh

Re: [asterisk-biz] Didx loves you !!

2010-11-05 Thread David Knell
On Fri, 2010-11-05 at 11:00 +, re...@supertec.com wrote: > But in the same 5 years my company managed to get from a few to 50 full time > guys, recognized by the worlds best people around the world taking revenue > from nothing to 6 figure + in usd How on earth do you support 50 full time g

[asterisk-biz] Why do you follow Asterisk-biz?

2010-11-05 Thread Randy R
Why do I follow Asterisk-biz? It's a question I found my self asking today. It might be interesting to chime in and say why you follow it and what you think. After all, it's *your* list! I follow this list to try to see what's going on in the world of commercial Asterisk. I like to see what new p

Re: [asterisk-biz] Didx loves you !!

2010-11-05 Thread re...@supertec.com
The 5 guys here that have nothing better to do but see the size of underwear everyone else is wearing, my suggestion to you is to use your fantastic skills and take advantae of them. In the last 5 years you guys have done enough mocking of everyone wo tried to do aything tha you are used to. B

Re: [asterisk-biz] Didx loves you !!

2010-11-05 Thread Dan Journo
> All the trash talking and debate about DIDX on the Asterisk-Biz list has > resulted in a few dozen new sign ups on DIDX today. We are working hard, > smart, and fast as we can to help these new voip companies. Thanks so much to > the Asterisk-Biz list members. We love you!!! Its these kinds of

Re: [asterisk-biz] DIDX Query

2010-11-05 Thread Justin Case
> > For domestic DIDs, I am a big, huge fan of flowroute. Had voicepulse, but > much happier since I moved to flowroute. > > I also had trouble getting things started with DIDx, but that being said > truly like some people at the organization such as Suzanne Bowers. Also, my > company helped wit

Re: [asterisk-biz] DIDX Query

2010-11-05 Thread Steve Totaro
> > On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 10:04 PM, Peter Beckman wrote: >> >> On Thu, 4 Nov 2010, Jai Rangi wrote: >> >> > Ofcourse any one will be happy to give you more channels on metered >> > services. The problem is with unmetered and unlimited. Do you get these >> > deals on unlimited services.? >> >>  Un