Re: [asterisk-biz] Need USA virtual PRIs for www.VisionVoIP.com

2009-08-31 Thread Jerry Jones
On Aug 31, 2009, at 10:33 AM, Sean McMaster wrote: Is this a fact or your personal opinion? Did you ask most large-scale providers what they are using and they reply everything but asterisk? How do you know? Sent from my iPod On Aug 31, 2009, at 9:32 AM, Alex Balashov wrote: Large-scal

Re: [asterisk-biz] ATA Bank for Asterisk, 400 phones

2009-01-07 Thread Jerry Jones
I have used the Vega with good results. The version I used did 24 ports in 1U, but they also have a 48port in 1U model. See http://www.vegastream.com/vegastream-portfolio/vega5000.asp OP did not spec, but he may wish to have gateways distributed if not all phones come back to a central MDF.

Re: [asterisk-biz] IP Phone w/ RJ11 Headset

2007-07-20 Thread Jerry Jones
And Polycom On Jul 20, 2007, at 4:22 PM, Tim Booth wrote: > all the snom's do > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> AASTRA 9133i's and up come with those. >> >> check em out at http://www.astawerks.com >> >> >> >> Quoting Matt Dunkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >> >>> Anyone know of an IP phone with an RJ1

Re: [asterisk-biz] G.722 VoIP Providers

2007-04-02 Thread Jerry Jones
On Apr 2, 2007, at 11:00 AM, Dean Collins wrote: Does anyone know if there is a license fee for the codec? Eg if an ITSP wants to implement this what costs are involved? And as soon as it hits the PSTN does it really make a difference? Personally I think it’s a great concept and all Aste

Re: [asterisk-biz] Complete Rate Center and NPA NXX List

2007-03-31 Thread Jerry Jones
Try the source? http://nanpa.com/ On Mar 31, 2007, at 5:13 AM, Linda Goldsmith wrote: Hello, Does any one knows where to download a list of NPA - NXX and All the rate centers number and names. Linda ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by

Re: [asterisk-biz] Small business traditional phones or IP Phone?

2007-02-05 Thread Jerry Jones
On Feb 5, 2007, at 2:53 PM, Warren (mailing lists) wrote: Pierre Marceau wrote: 4 - Using IP phones means running new ethernet wires to the phone locations (but thats all part of the fun!) on the other hand some phones have 2 ethernet ports, I guess they are '2 port ethernet hubs' so plug

Re: [asterisk-biz] Asterisk and DNIS

2006-12-15 Thread Jerry Jones
They would be extensions withinn the context set for incoming calls on the trunk I believe. On Dec 15, 2006, at 1:40 PM, Jim Houser wrote: Please forgive me if this is more of an end user question, but I figure the buisiness units here have needed to deal with this. I've been on the web

Re: [asterisk-biz] Nufone

2006-08-18 Thread Jerry Jones
Yes some telcos will allow you to set the NUMBER But the NAME displayed on the phone you are calling is done on a lookup of the number at the terminating telco. It will be whatever name is set for that number. You can set a name on your call, but the pstn will drop it, it does not pass end

Re: [Asterisk-biz] Serious Problem with SNOM Attendant phones - NeedHelp

2005-09-28 Thread Jerry Jones
Polycom is not yet shipping - at least on Monday when I last checked. We too had so many problems with Snoms in this situation. we have stopped using, and most customers want them replaced with Polycoms. We started using FOP as a display with a dedicated computer and flat screen for operato

Re: [Asterisk-biz] Talking of PoE ...

2005-07-13 Thread Jerry Jones
After my initial experience, my confidence in that switch was shaken. Even with the "couple things" that you note, you have to wonder what else is buggy on a product with such obvious bugs. I want my switches to be ROCK SOLID, when I have to diagnose network issues, I don't want to a

Re: [Asterisk-biz] Talking of PoE ...

2005-07-13 Thread Jerry Jones
On Jul 13, 2005, at 8:07 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The fact that it is a piece of junk (FSM7326P)! Bought two, both had bad flash after a firmware upgrade (tried one, talked with Netgear and vendor, and tried the other once a replacement was here)... No secondary flash either. I

[Asterisk-biz] PRI Hardware Echo Canceller

2005-07-01 Thread Jerry Jones
Search the archives. A couple months ago I wrote about how the Ditech (4 port) solved my issues. And yes long tail lengths are required for proper acoustic cancellation today. They also have some white papers. It is still going strong. Zero complaints since installation:) On Jun 30, 2005,