agents contacted us for private label service. I
talked to one guy who had almost $10K in commissions about to pay out.
John Scully
www.isupportisp.com
- Original Message -
From: "Al Bochter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion&qu
I'm sorry, I don't buy the 'not sustainable' arguement. We make
money on every customer, and on every call.
Our plans are:
$9.95 - Unlimited local calling and 3 cents/minute long distance
$14.95 - Unlimited local calling and 500 minutes of LD, then 3 cents/minute.
$24.95 - Unlimited local callin
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007, Alex Pilosov wrote:
> Its not a sustainable model.
It may be sustainable if serious enhanced services that actually
represent some sort of coherent added value are overlayed.
But I agree, that's not easy, nor is anyone who claims to do it actually
do it very well, wi
wrote:
>Well stated John.
>I think this discussion can end now. I am exhaused just reading it.
>
>Nicky Smith
>www.carolinanet.com
>a profitable ISP/Data Center
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Scully
>Sent: Wednesday,
-Oriented Asterisk Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-biz] Amp'd Going the Way of Sun Rocket
Well guys, I hate to tell you this, but we are running several hundred
profitable VoIP companies. profitable for us, profitable for our clients,
and the only reason they are able to sell service is that the
On Behalf Of John Scully
> Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 9:09 PM
> To: Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion
> Subject: Re: [asterisk-biz] Amp'd Going the Way of Sun Rocket
>
> Well guys, I hate to tell you this, but we are running several hundred
> profitable Vo
On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 20:52 -0400, Alex Pilosov wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Jul 2007, Matthew Rubenstein wrote:
>
> > I pay less every month for my consumer VoIP service than I ever
> > did, or would now, for my call traffic. And that's not even counting
> > foreign calls, including ones to Europe and
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nicky Smith
Sent: Wednesday, 25 July 2007 10:21 PM
To: 'Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion'
Subject: [asterisk-biz] Amp'd Going the Way of Sun Rocket
Well stated John.
I think this discussion can end now. I am exhaused just reading i
ROTECTED]>
To: "Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion"
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 8:11 PM
Subject: Re: [asterisk-biz] Amp'd Going the Way of Sun Rocket
>
> Bah. VoIP is hardly dead unless you're stuck in the US. There, it's
> been legislated
I pay less every month for my consumer VoIP service than I ever did, or
would now, for my call traffic. And that's not even counting foreign
calls, including ones to Europe and South Asia. Since it's flat rate, I
talk much longer internationally, even leaving the line open for long
business
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007, Matthew Rubenstein wrote:
> I pay less every month for my consumer VoIP service than I ever
> did, or would now, for my call traffic. And that's not even counting
> foreign calls, including ones to Europe and South Asia. Since it's flat
> rate, I talk much longer interna
corrections and additions:
On 7/26/07, Trixter aka Bret McDanel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> most of those companies also have higher costs to call from a
I meant countries, not companies
I also forgot to mention there are some cultural differences, ireland
for example the average person on th
On 7/26/07, SIP <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bah. VoIP is hardly dead unless you're stuck in the US. There, it's
> been legislated out of existence by telecoms that could no longer
> compete. And where they've failed in legislation, they've succeeded in
> dubious lawsuits.
>
> But then... that's w
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007, Matthew Rubenstein wrote:
> There is no way I'd ever let you near my "Commercial and
> Business-Oriented Asterisk" activity, which is the *only* legitimate
> subject of this mailing list. Not only are you laughably wrong about
> VoIP, you are a troll. There's no way you
559 1959 Office
> 1 866 568 9648 Fax
> 1 412 589 5389 Cell
>
> Http://www.BusinessCommunicationsNet.com
> Http://www.jackearl.com
>
>
> ---- Original Message ----
> Subject: Re: [asterisk-biz] Amp'd Going the Way of Sun Rocket
> From: Al Bochter
> Http://www.BusinessCommunicationsNet.com
> Http://www.jackearl.com
>
>
> -------- Original Message
> Subject: Re: [asterisk-biz] Amp'd Going the Way of Sun Rocket
> From: Al Bochter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
states.Jack Earl1 800 559 1959 Office1 866 568 9648 Fax1 412 589 5389 CellHttp://www.BusinessCommunicationsNet.comHttp://www.jackearl.com
Original Message
Subject: Re: [asterisk-biz] Amp'd Going the Way of Sun Rocket
From: Al Bochter bochterservices.com>
Date: Wed, July 25
The name "VOIP" has lost ground :(
And it has hit the press.
Best regards,
Al Bochter
http://www.BochterServices.com
---
See what we are selling at auction
http://www.epier.com/auctions.asp?bochterservices
-
Yes, I meant Verizon's suits. Thanks for the correction.
On Tue, 2007-07-24 at 23:12 -0400, Anthony Cennami wrote:
> Do you mean Verizon's suits? Both of these shakeups and/or shutdowns
> were the direct result of Verizon suits or contracts
>
> On 7/24/07, Matthew Rubenstein <[EMA
Do you mean Verizon's suits? Both of these shakeups and/or shutdowns were
the direct result of Verizon suits or contracts
On 7/24/07, Matthew Rubenstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It now looks like the "independent telcos" are in a shakeout. And
judging from general news and the qu
It now looks like the "independent telcos" are in a shakeout. And
judging from general news and the quality of services offered on this
list, the other indies aren't ready to handle the extra business.
How much of these windups are the result of AT&T's successful suits
against Vona
http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2007/07/24/ap3948212.html
Thanks,
Steve Totaro
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--
asterisk-biz mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/l
22 matches
Mail list logo
