Re: [asterisk-biz] DIDX Query

On Mon, 8 Nov 2010, Steve Totaro wrote: > What was the final reason given as to why your numbers "went away"? > I am reading "went away" to mean that they never came back. I can > also see how it could be understood to mean the problem went away. > Was it regulation, war, or what? The provider

Re: [asterisk-biz] DIDX Query

On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 11:57 PM, Peter Beckman wrote: > On Sun, 7 Nov 2010, Chris Bagnall wrote: > >>> I would stay away from DIDWW. We have had lots of times where DID's >>> just went dead and the answer was that the carrier stopped providing >>> them with service. >> >> Wondering if you'd mind e

Re: [asterisk-biz] DIDX Query

On Sun, 7 Nov 2010, Chris Bagnall wrote: >> I would stay away from DIDWW. We have had lots of times where DID's >> just went dead and the answer was that the carrier stopped providing >> them with service. > > Wondering if you'd mind elaborating a little on that? We've just started > using DIDWW f

Re: [asterisk-biz] DIDX Query

On 11/07/2010 06:28 PM, Josef Grand wrote: > full interop/stability/high availability / scalability / disponibility I assume "disponibility" is a false cognate from French (and Spanish) "disponible," meaning "available," which seems redundant given that you already said "high availability." --

Re: [asterisk-biz] DIDX Query

quot; Sent: Sunday, November 07, 2010 11:49 PM Subject: Re: [asterisk-biz] DIDX Query >> I would stay away from DIDWW. We have had lots of times where DID's >> just went dead and the answer was that the carrier stopped providing >> them with service. > > Wondering if

Re: [asterisk-biz] DIDX Query

> I would stay away from DIDWW. We have had lots of times where DID's > just went dead and the answer was that the carrier stopped providing > them with service. Wondering if you'd mind elaborating a little on that? We've just started using DIDWW for a few international destinations, and I certain

Re: [asterisk-biz] DIDX Query (Dan Journo)

BTW, they do not have recurring billing set automatically which will keep cutting you out every now and then if you forget. At least, does not work for us. On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 10:21 AM, Dan Journo wrote: >> I think you should give a try to DIDx even if one customer service rep >> didn't tell

Re: [asterisk-biz] DIDX Query (Dan Journo)

> I think you should give a try to DIDx even if one customer service rep didn't > tell you about a promotion he wasn't aware of. It was two customer service reps. > Seems a little bit harsh to discard using a company for receiving the wrong > information. What happened if I went with DIDX bas

Re: [asterisk-biz] DIDX Query (Dan Journo)

Hello, Just wanted to post my updated resume, since there were some things misunderstood in this discussion due to incorrect wording as Steve suggested. Here it is: http://www.scribd.com/doc/41426284/2010-11-DB-PBX-IT-Manager-Resume To Dan, I think you should give a try to DIDx even if one cust

Re: [asterisk-biz] DIDX Query (Dan Journo)

Suzanne Bowen said: > Just finished studying every item regarding Dan's DIDX Query on whether or > not buying 50 USA DIDs at $.15 per month would satisfy the 50 minimum DID > quantity fee on DIDX. Follow-ups: > 1. Yes, that math is correct. Dan is a valued customer, and I will call him > to le

Re: [asterisk-biz] DIDX Query (Dan Journo)

On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 4:04 PM, Max Glucksmann wrote: > Hello Steve, > > Just wanted to make my employment status clear. I don't receive wages from > DIDx net, neither have signed an employment agreement with them. We just > have Interop Agreements as DID Buyers and DID Sellers. I'm happily workin

Re: [asterisk-biz] DIDX Query (Dan Journo)

Hello Steve, Just wanted to make my employment status clear. I don't receive wages from DIDx net, neither have signed an employment agreement with them. We just have Interop Agreements as DID Buyers and DID Sellers. I'm happily working at Comtel Networks in FL (Fort Lauderdale, you're invited to s

Re: [asterisk-biz] DIDX Query (Dan Journo)

d they read about us on the Asterisk-Biz list > yesterday. We'll do our best to help these new VoIP companies based in USA > and from those OTHER countries. The success of DIDX members is important to > us, now and ongoing. > We don't mind the "trash talking" online

Re: [asterisk-biz] DIDX Query (Dan Journo)

On Fri, 5 Nov 2010, Suzanne Bowen wrote: 4. Regarding the message from Peter Beckman on beckman at angryox.com on Thu Nov 4 14:08:11 CDT 2010 ... “Their site is slow and awful, the design is bad and not well thought out, their API is useless for actually finding and purchasing DIDs, and the 50 D

Re: [asterisk-biz] DIDX Query

On Fri, 5 Nov 2010, SIP wrote: > On 11/4/10 1:13 PM, Fred Posner wrote: >> On Nov 4, 2010, at 12:53 PM, Jai Rangi wrote: >> >>> Vitelity is too expensive. That's why we have been very busy in porting >>> number from Vitelity to didforsale.com >> Wow. You work for didforsale.com... if you're going

Re: [asterisk-biz] DIDX Query

On 11/05/2010 10:09 AM, Jared Geiger wrote: > > > On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 1:44 AM, Alex Balashov > wrote: > > On 11/05/2010 01:04 AM, Peter Beckman wrote: > > >Unlimited does not exist. We all know that no company can offer > >unlimited. > >

Re: [asterisk-biz] DIDX Query

On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 1:44 AM, Alex Balashov wrote: > On 11/05/2010 01:04 AM, Peter Beckman wrote: > > >Unlimited does not exist. We all know that no company can offer > >unlimited. > > > There is a major CLEC owned by an ILEC in the US that offers unlimited channels/minutes inbound for

Re: [asterisk-biz] DIDX Query (Dan Journo)

On 11/05/2010 09:20 AM, Suzanne Bowen wrote: > 8. Regarding Alex Balashov abalashov at evaristesys.com > 's remarks on Thu Nov 4 13:56:19 CDT 2010 > including the following ... > "The debasement, cultural Third Worldisation, and used car salesmanship > of the VoIP originati

Re: [asterisk-biz] DIDX Query (Dan Journo)

bowen Media channel: http://www.didx.net/podcast On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 2:52 PM, wrote: > > > -- > > Message: 1 > Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 14:53:46 -0400 > From: Dan Journo > Subject: [asterisk-biz] DIDX

Re: [asterisk-biz] DIDX Query

On Nov 5, 2010, at 7:54 AM, SIP wrote: > On 11/4/10 1:13 PM, Fred Posner wrote: >> On Nov 4, 2010, at 12:53 PM, Jai Rangi wrote: >> >>> Vitelity is too expensive. That's why we have been very busy in porting >>> number from Vitelity to didforsale.com >> Wow. You work for didforsale.com... if you

Re: [asterisk-biz] DIDX Query

On 11/4/10 3:10 PM, Peter Beckman wrote: > On Thu, 4 Nov 2010, Steve Totaro wrote: > >> Junction is comparatively expensive, it is also rock solid and run >> like a real telco. Phone number for immediate support, reasonable >> wait times, quick resolutions. I think the product that they supply >>

Re: [asterisk-biz] DIDX Query

On 11/4/10 1:13 PM, Fred Posner wrote: > On Nov 4, 2010, at 12:53 PM, Jai Rangi wrote: > >> Vitelity is too expensive. That's why we have been very busy in porting >> number from Vitelity to didforsale.com > Wow. You work for didforsale.com... if you're going to post something like > that, you sh

Re: [asterisk-biz] DIDX Query

> > For domestic DIDs, I am a big, huge fan of flowroute. Had voicepulse, but > much happier since I moved to flowroute. > > I also had trouble getting things started with DIDx, but that being said > truly like some people at the organization such as Suzanne Bowers. Also, my > company helped wit

Re: [asterisk-biz] DIDX Query

> > On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 10:04 PM, Peter Beckman wrote: >> >> On Thu, 4 Nov 2010, Jai Rangi wrote: >> >> > Ofcourse any one will be happy to give you more channels on metered >> > services. The problem is with unmetered and unlimited. Do you get these >> > deals on unlimited services.? >> >>  Un

Re: [asterisk-biz] DIDX Query

> > > On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 7:24 PM, Steve Totaro < > stot...@totarotechnologies.com> wrote: > >> On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 9:14 PM, Peter Beckman >> wrote: >> > On Thu, 4 Nov 2010, Jai Rangi wrote: >> > >> >> Peter, >> >> Yes, I do run didforsale.com. $5 activation is always negotiable for >> >> or

Re: [asterisk-biz] DIDX Query

On 11/05/2010 02:21 AM, Alex Balashov wrote: > The marginal increase in access revenue must be weighed > against variable cost increases in numbering resource usage, network > capacity (for small guys, this can be an issue), administration and > provisioning overhead (including LNP), bandwidth, et

Re: [asterisk-biz] DIDX Query

On 11/05/2010 01:53 AM, Jake Hansen wrote: > CLECS actually get paid when somone calls inbound to them don't they? > So yea unlimited inbound makes perfect sense. Kind of, but there's not a lot that can be divined from that generalisation in and of itself. :-) CLECs get paid for inbound calls

Re: [asterisk-biz] DIDX Query

On 11/04/2010 02:53 PM, Dan Journo wrote: > > i am on a aeroplane from singapore right now, i cant do it my self, i > run 35 other services beside didx if i started to do this i cant do anything > > My question is, when did he say earlier that I need to contact customer > services? I don't think

Re: [asterisk-biz] DIDX Query

CLECS actually get paid when somone calls inbound to them don't they? So yea unlimited inbound makes perfect sense. On 11/4/2010 10:25 PM, Jai Rangi wrote: > Actually this is not a joke. You can really push 864K minutes. We have > people using these DIDs for calling card, Call Centers and Call

Re: [asterisk-biz] DIDX Query

On 11/4/2010 10:04 PM, Peter Beckman wrote: > On Thu, 4 Nov 2010, Jai Rangi wrote: > >> Ofcourse any one will be happy to give you more channels on metered >> services. The problem is with unmetered and unlimited. Do you get these >> deals on unlimited services.? >Unlimited does not exist. We

Re: [asterisk-biz] DIDX Query

On 11/05/2010 01:04 AM, Peter Beckman wrote: >Unlimited does not exist. We all know that no company can offer >unlimited. You're absolutely right. The problem with "unlimited" marketing is that it results in a case of "bad money drives out the good." The vendors who advertise unlimite

Re: [asterisk-biz] DIDX Query

Actually this is not a joke. You can really push 864K minutes. We have people using these DIDs for calling card, Call Centers and Call Conferences. Disclaimer: This is inbound only. Jai Rangi jpra...@didforsale.com www.didforsale.com On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 10:04 PM, Peter Beckman wrote: > On

Re: [asterisk-biz] DIDX Query (Caution--top posting. If you don't like it, delete it)

ckman Sent: Friday, November 05, 2010 12:04 AM To: Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-biz] DIDX Query On Thu, 4 Nov 2010, Jai Rangi wrote: > Ofcourse any one will be happy to give you more channels on metered > services. The problem is with unmetered an

Re: [asterisk-biz] DIDX Query

On Thu, 4 Nov 2010, Jai Rangi wrote: > Ofcourse any one will be happy to give you more channels on metered > services. The problem is with unmetered and unlimited. Do you get these > deals on unlimited services.? Unlimited does not exist. We all know that no company can offer unlimited. Not

Re: [asterisk-biz] DIDX Query

Ofcourse any one will be happy to give you more channels on metered services. The problem is with unmetered and unlimited. Do you get these deals on unlimited services.? -Jai www.didforsale.com On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 7:24 PM, Steve Totaro wrote: > On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 9:14 PM, Peter Beckma

Re: [asterisk-biz] DIDX Query

On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 9:14 PM, Peter Beckman wrote: > On Thu, 4 Nov 2010, Jai Rangi wrote: > >> Peter, >> Yes, I do run didforsale.com. $5 activation is always negotiable for >> ordering large number. Even then in the long run you will save more. >> $1/Month $0.004 is cheaper. >> $8.99/Month, Unl

Re: [asterisk-biz] DIDX Query

On Thu, 4 Nov 2010, Jai Rangi wrote: > Peter, > Yes, I do run didforsale.com. $5 activation is always negotiable for > ordering large number. Even then in the long run you will save more. > $1/Month $0.004 is cheaper. > $8.99/Month, Unlimited Minute with 20 channels has been unbeatable. On the > o

Re: [asterisk-biz] DIDX Query

ry (Dan Journo) > > -- > > Message: 1 > Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 14:53:46 -0400 > From: Dan Journo > Subject: [asterisk-biz] DIDX Query > To: Nauman Ibrahim > Cc: Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion > > Message-ID: ><

Re: [asterisk-biz] DIDX Query

On 11/04/2010 04:26 PM, Dan Journo wrote: > I don't like it when I ask for a recommendation on the list, > and I get a load of personal emails from guys with asterisk box on > an ADSL connection saying they can provide me with service. Most of the commercial entities on this list are part of what

Re: [asterisk-biz] DIDX Query

I tried to sell DIDs on didx. I had 10,000+ I was initially going to post. However, after calling their support, and sending emails to no reply I didn't want to deal with them. Oh, and I was trying to post DIDs that no one else can since we are in all the RLECs in PA. http://www.alcazarnetwo

Re: [asterisk-biz] DIDX Query

I don't like it when I ask for a recommendation on the list, and I get a load of personal emails from guys with asterisk box on an ADSL connection saying they can provide me with service. So far in my first year of trying out the VOIP business, I've only found one company that I really trust. An

Re: [asterisk-biz] DIDX Query

Director > 445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA > direct: +1 256-428-6007 > Check us out at : www.asterisk.org or www.digium.com > > - Original Message - > From: "Alex Balashov" > To: asterisk-biz@lists.digium.com > Sent: Thursday, November 4

Re: [asterisk-biz] DIDX Query

On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 3:00 PM, Alex Balashov wrote: > On 11/04/2010 02:55 PM, Steve Totaro wrote: > >> Junction is comparatively expensive, it is also rock solid and run >> like a real telco.  Phone number for immediate support, reasonable >> wait times, quick resolutions.  I think the product th

Re: [asterisk-biz] DIDX Query

: "Alex Balashov" To: asterisk-biz@lists.digium.com Sent: Thursday, November 4, 2010 2:56:19 PM Subject: Re: [asterisk-biz] DIDX Query On 11/04/2010 02:34 PM, Jorge Bellas wrote: > Make that +2. I've stopped using this list as a business tool. Too many > folks are shredded here f

Re: [asterisk-biz] DIDX Query

Okay. -Original Message- From: asterisk-biz-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-biz-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Alex Balashov Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2010 1:56 PM To: asterisk-biz@lists.digium.com Subject: Re: [asterisk-biz] DIDX Query On 11/04/2010 02:34 PM, Jorge

Re: [asterisk-biz] DIDX Query

On Thu, 4 Nov 2010, Steve Totaro wrote: > Junction is comparatively expensive, it is also rock solid and run > like a real telco. Phone number for immediate support, reasonable > wait times, quick resolutions. I think the product that they supply > is worth the extra scratch in case there are te

Re: [asterisk-biz] DIDX Query

I use DIDx occasionally. I really don't like to. Their site is slow and awful, the design is bad and not well thought out, their API is useless for actually finding and purchasing DIDs, and the 50 DID or $50/month requirement is annoying, though from a business sense I understand the motivation.

Re: [asterisk-biz] DIDX Query

-biz-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Paul Belanger > Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2010 1:22 PM > To: Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion > Subject: Re: [asterisk-biz] DIDX Query > > On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Zeeshan Zakaria wrote: >> Thanks for poi

Re: [asterisk-biz] DIDX Query

On 11/04/2010 02:55 PM, Steve Totaro wrote: > Junction is comparatively expensive, it is also rock solid and run > like a real telco. Phone number for immediate support, reasonable > wait times, quick resolutions. I think the product that they supply > is worth the extra scratch in case there ar

Re: [asterisk-biz] DIDX Query

> Sent an email to Customer Services. I've got a feeling I know what they are > going to say. Surprising. Refund processed by Customer Services. -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- ast

Re: [asterisk-biz] DIDX Query

On 11/04/2010 02:34 PM, Jorge Bellas wrote: > Make that +2. I've stopped using this list as a business tool. Too many > folks are shredded here for sport. It's become a spectacle. Hopefully, it > can recover and become useful once again. > > I'm half expecting someone to respond and criticize my g

Re: [asterisk-biz] DIDX Query

On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 12:45 PM, Peter Beckman wrote: > On Thu, 4 Nov 2010, Steve Totaro wrote: > >> I like Vitelity personally and often recommend Junction and VoicePulse. > >  I like and prefer Vitelity as well -- good rates and functional API. >  I've used Junction as well and they are fine, a

Re: [asterisk-biz] DIDX Query

>> Any chance of refunding my $11 that I paid when one of your operators told >> me that I can purchase a german DDI even though i'm in the UK? >It should have been already refunded, if it does not show up, I will give *3 >personally, send me your paypal So I sent him an email with my request,

Re: [asterisk-biz] DIDX Query

Communications, Inc. jbel...@cat5com.com -Original Message- From: asterisk-biz-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-biz-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Paul Belanger Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2010 1:22 PM To: Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion Subject: Re

Re: [asterisk-biz] DIDX Query

On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 12:15 PM, Rehan Allahwala wrote: > Man, For all this free publicity and making our ranking better and better in > the search, I think you all deserve a gift . > So anyone up for a Few T-shirts, Few Numbers, and Some other goodies. > Drop me an email. > Compliments of the DID

Re: [asterisk-biz] DIDX Query

On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Zeeshan Zakaria wrote: > Thanks for pointing this out. Maybe it'll be even better if nobody makes any > negative, disrespectful and discouraging comments on this mailing list > against anybody at all, which defeats the very basic purpose of having this > mailing lis

Re: [asterisk-biz] DIDX Query

Hi Bryan, Thanks for pointing this out. Maybe it'll be even better if nobody makes any negative, disrespectful and discouraging comments on this mailing list against anybody at all, which defeats the very basic purpose of having this mailing list. Zeeshan A Zakaria -- www.ilovetovoip.com www.pbx

Re: [asterisk-biz] DIDX Query

k-biz-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-biz-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Bryan M. Johns Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2010 12:51 PM To: Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-biz] DIDX Query Promoting your own services here is a reasonably acceptabl

Re: [asterisk-biz] DIDX Query

Promoting your own services here is a reasonably acceptable practice. However, making disparaging remarks about competitors in the process is considered to be rude and is discouraged. Thank you in advance for your cooperation. Bryan M. Johns Digium, Inc. | Community Director 445 Jan Davis D

Re: [asterisk-biz] DIDX Query

On 11/04/2010 08:49 AM, Steve Totaro wrote: > They have always come across to me as a shady company and I refuse to > do business with them partially because of that and the fact that > everytime I out them, I get constant calls from Suzanne Bowen. There > is a very long history there and I hope

Re: [asterisk-biz] DIDX Query

Yes, let me make it clear, I do own www.didforsale.com -Jai On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 10:13 AM, Fred Posner wrote: > On Nov 4, 2010, at 12:53 PM, Jai Rangi wrote: > > > Vitelity is too expensive. That's why we have been very busy in porting > number from Vitelity to didforsale.com > > Wow. You wor

Re: [asterisk-biz] DIDX Query

Peter, Yes, I do run didforsale.com. $5 activation is always negotiable for ordering large number. Even then in the long run you will save more. $1/Month $0.004 is cheaper. $8.99/Month, Unlimited Minute with 20 channels has been unbeatable. On the other side Vitelity is $17 per channel. -Jai On T

Re: [asterisk-biz] DIDX Query

On 11/04/2010 01:06 PM, Peter Beckman wrote: >Maybe you just got a deal direct with Level3 or someone and you are >porting, but I think your statement that they are too expensive is not >based in reality. Nah. The didforsale.com rate center list suggests it's more or less a straight

Re: [asterisk-biz] DIDX Query

On 11/04/2010 01:13 PM, Fred Posner wrote: > Wow. You work for didforsale.com. Owner, not employee. -- Alex Balashov - Principal Evariste Systems LLC 1170 Peachtree Street 12th Floor, Suite 1200 Atlanta, GA 30309 Tel: +1-678-954-0670 Fax: +1-404-961-1892 Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/ -- __

Re: [asterisk-biz] DIDX Query

siness-Oriented Asterisk Discussion" Sent: Thursday, November 4, 2010 1:13:03 PM Subject: Re: [asterisk-biz] DIDX Query On Nov 4, 2010, at 12:53 PM, Jai Rangi wrote: > Vitelity is too expensive. That's why we have been very busy in porting > number from Vitelity to didforsale.com W

Re: [asterisk-biz] DIDX Query

On Nov 4, 2010, at 12:53 PM, Jai Rangi wrote: > Vitelity is too expensive. That's why we have been very busy in porting > number from Vitelity to didforsale.com Wow. You work for didforsale.com... if you're going to post something like that, you should make it clear. Otherwise, it kind of just

Re: [asterisk-biz] DIDX Query

On Thu, 4 Nov 2010, Jai Rangi wrote: > Vitelity is too expensive. That's why we have been very busy in porting > number from Vitelity to didforsale.com Sorry? You run didforsale.com Jai. Your pricing is not better than the wholesale pricing from Vitelity. A $5 activation fee?!? $1/month?

Re: [asterisk-biz] DIDX Query

Vitelity is too expensive. That's why we have been very busy in porting number from Vitelity to didforsale.com On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 9:45 AM, Peter Beckman wrote: > On Thu, 4 Nov 2010, Steve Totaro wrote: > > > I like Vitelity personally and often recommend Junction and VoicePulse. > > I li

Re: [asterisk-biz] DIDX Query

It should have been already refunded, if it does not show up, I will give *3 personally, send me your paypal anything else ? Do Not remember me? Visit http://www.rehan.com What is DIDX? http://youtu.be/acCDzP-7oqY On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 9:35 PM, Dan Journo wrote: > > Man, For all this

Re: [asterisk-biz] DIDX Query

On Thu, 4 Nov 2010, Steve Totaro wrote: > I like Vitelity personally and often recommend Junction and VoicePulse. I like and prefer Vitelity as well -- good rates and functional API. I've used Junction as well and they are fine, a bit more expensive though. I've used DIDww for International

Re: [asterisk-biz] DIDX Query

> Man, For all this free publicity and making our ranking better and better in > the search, I think you all deserve a gift . Any chance of refunding my $11 that I paid when one of your operators told me that I can purchase a german DDI even though i'm in the UK? Dan --

Re: [asterisk-biz] DIDX Query

Man, For all this free publicity and making our ranking better and better in the search, I think you all deserve a gift . So anyone up for a Few T-shirts, Few Numbers, and Some other goodies. Drop me an email. Compliments of the DIDX.net For those who are in business for Real, Go ahead and TRY

Re: [asterisk-biz] DIDX Query

Thanks Steve, That was really helpful and now I understand how such a "great company", isnt that great at all! >From what I've found so far, DIDX (actually virtualphoneline) are very >troublesome. I noticed that on their website, you need to be a current resident in Germany to get a german dd

Re: [asterisk-biz] DIDX Query

On Nov 4, 2010, at 8:49 AM, Steve Totaro wrote: >>> Alex Balashov wrote: >>> >>> >>> Now, now, why all the negativity? Dan's plight warrants our empathy: >>> he is using DIDX. >>> >>> The fact that he thought it faster - and perhaps liable to be more >>> accurate - to ask the list than DIDX

Re: [asterisk-biz] DIDX Query

>> Alex Balashov wrote: >> >> >> Now, now, why all the negativity?  Dan's plight warrants our empathy: >>  he is using DIDX. >> >> The fact that he thought it faster - and perhaps liable to be more >> accurate - to ask the list than DIDX itself is not his fault;  it's a >> symptom of a whole probl

Re: [asterisk-biz] DIDX Query

Alex, Do you think Didx should be avoided? If so, where do you go for dids? Can you recommend a better provider? Thanks Dan Alex Balashov wrote: Now, now, why all the negativity? Dan's plight warrants our empathy: he is using DIDX. The fact that he thought it faster - and perhaps liable

Re: [asterisk-biz] DIDX Query

Now, now, why all the negativity? Dan's plight warrants our empathy: he is using DIDX. The fact that he thought it faster - and perhaps liable to be more accurate - to ask the list than DIDX itself is not his fault; it's a symptom of a whole problem in itself, which is that this is the stat

Re: [asterisk-biz] DIDX Query

> I don't know... seemed like an appropriate response to me, as your message > didn't include something like "I can't get an answer from them" or > otherwise... that's a flat out Didx support question in my book. You are right. It is just a didx support question. I just thought that someone on

Re: [asterisk-biz] DIDX Query

You sir, win the inter-nets! On 11/3/2010 12:27 PM, Don Kelly wrote: > Smart-assed should be hyphenated. > > --Don > > > > > Jake Hansen: > Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2010 2:20 PM > > Just for your enjoyment an even more smart assed post! > > http://lmgtfy.com/?q=didx+faq&l=1 > > On 11/3/2010 1

Re: [asterisk-biz] DIDX Query

Smart-assed should be hyphenated. --Don Jake Hansen: Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2010 2:20 PM Just for your enjoyment an even more smart assed post! http://lmgtfy.com/?q=didx+faq&l=1 On 11/3/2010 12:02 PM, Dan Journo wrote: >> Ask DIDX. > Thanks steve for your pointless top-posted rep

Re: [asterisk-biz] DIDX Query

On Nov 3, 2010, at 3:02 PM, Dan Journo wrote: >> Ask DIDX. > > Thanks steve for your pointless top-posted reply. The world is really a > better place with you in it. > > I thought that someone on the list would know or have experience of this, > without having to wait for DIDX to respond.

Re: [asterisk-biz] DIDX Query

Just for your enjoyment an even more smart assed post! http://lmgtfy.com/?q=didx+faq&l=1 On 11/3/2010 12:02 PM, Dan Journo wrote: >> Ask DIDX. > Thanks steve for your pointless top-posted reply. The world is really a > better place with you in it. > > I thought that someone on the list would

Re: [asterisk-biz] DIDX Query

Hello Dan, We have Special Offers available from where you can buy 50 DIDs of USA in 15$ Monthly. You can check the Special Offers after login into your DIDX.Net account click on Special Offer which is on left hand side of the portal. Regards, Ahsan On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 11:53 PM, Dan Journo

Re: [asterisk-biz] DIDX Query

> Ask DIDX. Thanks steve for your pointless top-posted reply. The world is really a better place with you in it. I thought that someone on the list would know or have experience of this, without having to wait for DIDX to respond. Dan -- __

Re: [asterisk-biz] DIDX Query

Ask DIDX. On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 2:53 PM, Dan Journo wrote: > Hi, > > > > I am aware that I need to have a minimum of 50 DDI's on my account in order > to avoid the $50 monthly fee. > > > > I've noticed that DIDX have a USA numbers available for $0.15. > > > > Does that mean if I purchase 50

[asterisk-biz] DIDX Query

Hi, I am aware that I need to have a minimum of 50 DDI's on my account in order to avoid the $50 monthly fee. I've noticed that DIDX have a USA numbers available for $0.15. Does that mean if I purchase 50 USA numbers @ 0.15, all I will have to pay is $7.50 per month? Thanks Dan -- __