"the eye in
> the pyramid". It would probably be worse than getting our liver plucked
> by eagles for eternity.
>
>
> On Sun, 2008-02-03 at 07:50 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > Message: 1
> > Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 15:21:28 -0600
> > From: "I
is god" with Google "the eye in
the pyramid". It would probably be worse than getting our liver plucked
by eagles for eternity.
On Sun, 2008-02-03 at 07:50 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> Message: 1
> Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 15:21:28 -0600
> From: "Ignacio Ramos" <
Watch this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iu0ztxdsFis
cheers
2008/2/2, Andres Paglayan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On Feb 1, 2008, at 6:20 AM, Matthew Rubenstein wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 2008-02-01 at 02:42 -0500, Alex Balashov wrote:
> >> Matthew Rubenstein wrote:
> >>
> >>> Lewis says telcos don
On Feb 1, 2008, at 6:20 AM, Matthew Rubenstein wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-02-01 at 02:42 -0500, Alex Balashov wrote:
>> Matthew Rubenstein wrote:
>>
>>> Lewis says telcos don't innovate and always accidentally caught
>>> up with
>>> outside innovation, that telcos act like they've got a "god giv
On Fri, 2008-02-01 at 02:42 -0500, Alex Balashov wrote:
> Matthew Rubenstein wrote:
>
> > Lewis says telcos don't innovate and always accidentally caught up with
> > outside innovation, that telcos act like they've got a "god given right"
> > to make profits just because they've invested money
Matthew Rubenstein wrote:
> Lewis says telcos don't innovate and always accidentally caught up with
> outside innovation, that telcos act like they've got a "god given right"
> to make profits just because they've invested money in networks. That IP
> "telephony" is really beyond telephony i
On Sun, 27 Jan 2008, Tim H. Panton wrote:
> 5x9s availability needs to extend to include sucessfully reaching the
> right person!
For some carriers, 5x9 means 5 days a week, 9 hours a day. :)
Sorry, that just made me giggle.
-alex
___
--Bandwidth and
--
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthew
Rubenstein
Sent: January 27, 2008 8:03 AM
To: Asterisk -Biz
Subject: Re: [asterisk-biz] Futures of the telecoms business.
Lewis says telcos don't innovate and always accidentally caught up
with
outside innovation,
-
From: Steve Totaro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion
Sent: Sun, 27 Jan 2008 16:21:50 + (GMT)
Subject: Re: [asterisk-biz] Futures of the telecoms business.
On Jan 27, 2008 7:24 AM, Tim H. Panton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'v
On Sun, 2008-01-27 at 17:44 +, Tim H. Panton wrote:
> It is true that a lot of what he says is old news
> to this list. But there were a couple of points I
> found new:
>
> 5x9s availability needs to extend to include
> sucessfully reaching the right person!
>
that doesnt figure into anythi
;.
Still worth a listen.
Tim
- Original Message -
From: Matthew Rubenstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Asterisk -Biz
Cc: Tim H. Panton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sun, 27 Jan 2008 16:02:34 + (GMT)
Subject: Re: [asterisk-biz] Futures of the telecoms business.
Lewis say
On Jan 27, 2008 7:24 AM, Tim H. Panton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've just listened to a great podcast
>
> http://www.ecommmedia.com/2008/downloads/audio/2008-01-17-norman-lewis-interview-part1-64.mp3
> Where Norman Lewis talks about the future of the telecoms business.
>
> Well worth a listen i
Lewis says telcos don't innovate and always accidentally caught up with
outside innovation, that telcos act like they've got a "god given right"
to make profits just because they've invested money in networks. That IP
"telephony" is really beyond telephony into "the future of
communications
I've just listened to a great podcast
http://www.ecommmedia.com/2008/downloads/audio/2008-01-17-norman-lewis-interview-part1-64.mp3
Where Norman Lewis talks about the future of the telecoms business.
Well worth a listen if you want to know what might happen in the next few years.
It's part of
14 matches
Mail list logo
