Apologies for bringing up an old thread but I had hoped it would have
continued on it's own and I take issue with Xorcom's code getting included
and causing issue after issue.
Kevin said "I believe that redfone did submit their driver for inclusion
into
Zaptel, and that it was rejected for the rea
Hello all,
I am the author and maintainer of TDMoE-Multiframe.
[please do not read the following as an attack, but rather simple
comments.]
The code did not have any major coding or quality issues, but rather
had licensing issues because I had an old license on file and Digium
switching to
Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
Bill Michaelson wrote:
ztd-ethmf.c
As I said, that driver has been part of Zaptel, so could not have been
removed.
Correction: it was in Zaptel SVN for a very short time, it had been
committed without proper code review. It
Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
> Bill Michaelson wrote:
>
>> ztd-ethmf.c
>
> As I said, that driver has been part of Zaptel, so could not have been
> removed.
Correction: it was in Zaptel SVN for a very short time, it had been
committed without proper code review. It was removed quickly thereafter,
and
Bill Michaelson wrote:
> ztd-ethmf.c
As I said, that driver has been part of Zaptel, so could not have been
removed.
--
Kevin P. Fleming
Director of Software Technologies
Digium, Inc. - "The Genuine Asterisk Experience" (TM)
___
--Bandwidth and Coloc
Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
Bill Michaelson wrote:
Perhaps I am mistaken, or there is a semantic distinction. But I
obtained the code required to support the foneBRIDGE from an old driver
listing in a changelog, because the required module was not present, if
I recall correctly. I believe the
Bill Michaelson wrote:
> Perhaps I am mistaken, or there is a semantic distinction. But I
> obtained the code required to support the foneBRIDGE from an old driver
> listing in a changelog, because the required module was not present, if
> I recall correctly. I believe the author was named Bende
Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
Bill Michaelson wrote:
>And when I recently tried to use a redfone foneBRIDGE, a product that
>can be regarded as competitive to Digium HW offerings, I discovered that
>the process of building the driver was very cumbersome because the
>required module was removed fr
Bill Michaelson wrote:
> And when I recently tried to use a redfone foneBRIDGE, a product that
> can be regarded as competitive to Digium HW offerings, I discovered that
> the process of building the driver was very cumbersome because the
> required module was removed from the zaptel code reposito
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 1:31 PM, Vlasis Hatzistavrou (KTI) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> John Todd wrote:
> > Any mechanism that could improve the
> > Asterisk Open Source project is interesting to me, regardless of how
> > well we believe the current model works. If there's interest -
> > great
Vlasis Hatzistavrou (KTI) wrote:
John Todd wrote:
Any mechanism that could improve the
Asterisk Open Source project is interesting to me, regardless of how
well we believe the current model works. If there's interest -
great! Let's see if it's serious. If not, OK, then things seem to
John Todd wrote:
> Any mechanism that could improve the
> Asterisk Open Source project is interesting to me, regardless of how
> well we believe the current model works. If there's interest -
> great! Let's see if it's serious. If not, OK, then things seem to be
> working as they are no
Jared Smith wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-10-31 at 10:20 -0400, Steve Totaro wrote:
>
>> A profit margin for Asterisk or Digium? Where is the line drawn here.
>> The line was moved quite a bit with Adwords debacle.
>>
>
> John isn't suggesting in any way that this would be for Digium's
> financi
On Fri, 2008-10-31 at 10:20 -0400, Steve Totaro wrote:
> A profit margin for Asterisk or Digium? Where is the line drawn here.
> The line was moved quite a bit with Adwords debacle.
John isn't suggesting in any way that this would be for Digium's
financial benefit -- he's simply trying to see i
I'm hoping we'll be talking about this question today on the live
conference in less than 30 minutes.
http://voipusersconference.org for how to participate. Only about 250
seats left!
/r
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital
John Todd
Sent: Friday, 31 October 2008 6:12 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion;
asterisk-biz@lists.digium.com
Subject: [asterisk-biz] General development funding: discussion and
survey
[sending to -users and -biz in a slightly different format to broaden
particip
I generally pay for custom development. I would chip in a bit if there were
a PayPal Donation link on the Asterisk.org site.
John Todd "Summary:
> Would you help fund different Open-Source Asterisk enhancements,
> bugfixes, or documentation if there was a way to collectively
> contribute money
for funding.
>
> Regards
>
>
> Craig Lawrence
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Todd
> Sent: Friday, 31 October 2008 6:12 AM
> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion;
I don't want to sound snarky, but could you offer a pointer or two to
get somebody started who wanted to find the problems (and perhaps some
suggested solutions) with the way Digium is doing Open Source? I am
genuinely interested.
Currently, I'm inclined to agree that some sort of escrow-ed
bount
risk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion;
asterisk-biz@lists.digium.com
Subject: [asterisk-biz] General development funding: discussion and
survey
[sending to -users and -biz in a slightly different format to broaden
participation]
Summary:
Would you help fund different Open-Sourc
[sending to -users and -biz in a slightly different format to broaden
participation]
Summary:
Would you help fund different Open-Source Asterisk enhancements,
bugfixes, or documentation if there was a way to collectively
contribute money towards the effort without a profit margin
incorp
21 matches
Mail list logo
