Apologies for bringing up an old thread but I had hoped it would have
continued on it's own and I take issue with Xorcom's code getting included
and causing issue after issue.
Kevin said I believe that redfone did submit their driver for inclusion
into
Zaptel, and that it was rejected for the
I don't want to sound snarky, but could you offer a pointer or two to
get somebody started who wanted to find the problems (and perhaps some
suggested solutions) with the way Digium is doing Open Source? I am
genuinely interested.
Currently, I'm inclined to agree that some sort of escrow-ed
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Todd
Sent: Friday, 31 October 2008 6:12 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion;
asterisk-biz@lists.digium.com
Subject: [asterisk-biz] General development funding: discussion and
survey
[sending to -users
I generally pay for custom development. I would chip in a bit if there were
a PayPal Donation link on the Asterisk.org site.
John Todd Summary:
Would you help fund different Open-Source Asterisk enhancements,
bugfixes, or documentation if there was a way to collectively
contribute money
: Friday, 31 October 2008 6:12 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion;
asterisk-biz@lists.digium.com
Subject: [asterisk-biz] General development funding: discussion and
survey
[sending to -users and -biz in a slightly different format to broaden
participation]
Summary
I'm hoping we'll be talking about this question today on the live
conference in less than 30 minutes.
http://voipusersconference.org for how to participate. Only about 250
seats left!
/r
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by
On Fri, 2008-10-31 at 10:20 -0400, Steve Totaro wrote:
A profit margin for Asterisk or Digium? Where is the line drawn here.
The line was moved quite a bit with Adwords debacle.
John isn't suggesting in any way that this would be for Digium's
financial benefit -- he's simply trying to see if
Jared Smith wrote:
On Fri, 2008-10-31 at 10:20 -0400, Steve Totaro wrote:
A profit margin for Asterisk or Digium? Where is the line drawn here.
The line was moved quite a bit with Adwords debacle.
John isn't suggesting in any way that this would be for Digium's
financial benefit
John Todd wrote:
Any mechanism that could improve the
Asterisk Open Source project is interesting to me, regardless of how
well we believe the current model works. If there's interest -
great! Let's see if it's serious. If not, OK, then things seem to be
working as they are now.
Vlasis Hatzistavrou (KTI) wrote:
John Todd wrote:
Any mechanism that could improve the
Asterisk Open Source project is interesting to me, regardless of how
well we believe the current model works. If there's interest -
great! Let's see if it's serious. If not, OK, then things seem
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 1:31 PM, Vlasis Hatzistavrou (KTI) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
John Todd wrote:
Any mechanism that could improve the
Asterisk Open Source project is interesting to me, regardless of how
well we believe the current model works. If there's interest -
great! Let's
Bill Michaelson wrote:
And when I recently tried to use a redfone foneBRIDGE, a product that
can be regarded as competitive to Digium HW offerings, I discovered that
the process of building the driver was very cumbersome because the
required module was removed from the zaptel code repository
Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
Bill Michaelson wrote:
And when I recently tried to use a redfone foneBRIDGE, a product that
can be regarded as competitive to Digium HW offerings, I discovered that
the process of building the driver was very cumbersome because the
required module was removed from
Bill Michaelson wrote:
Perhaps I am mistaken, or there is a semantic distinction. But I
obtained the code required to support the foneBRIDGE from an old driver
listing in a changelog, because the required module was not present, if
I recall correctly. I believe the author was named Benden.
Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
Bill Michaelson wrote:
Perhaps I am mistaken, or there is a semantic distinction. But I
obtained the code required to support the foneBRIDGE from an old driver
listing in a changelog, because the required module was not present, if
I recall correctly. I believe the
Bill Michaelson wrote:
ztd-ethmf.c
As I said, that driver has been part of Zaptel, so could not have been
removed.
--
Kevin P. Fleming
Director of Software Technologies
Digium, Inc. - The Genuine Asterisk Experience (TM)
___
--Bandwidth and
Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
Bill Michaelson wrote:
ztd-ethmf.c
As I said, that driver has been part of Zaptel, so could not have been
removed.
Correction: it was in Zaptel SVN for a very short time, it had been
committed without proper code review. It was removed quickly thereafter,
and was
Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
Bill Michaelson wrote:
ztd-ethmf.c
As I said, that driver has been part of Zaptel, so could not have been
removed.
Correction: it was in Zaptel SVN for a very short time, it had been
committed without proper code review.
Hello all,
I am the author and maintainer of TDMoE-Multiframe.
[please do not read the following as an attack, but rather simple
comments.]
The code did not have any major coding or quality issues, but rather
had licensing issues because I had an old license on file and Digium
switching
[sending to -users and -biz in a slightly different format to broaden
participation]
Summary:
Would you help fund different Open-Source Asterisk enhancements,
bugfixes, or documentation if there was a way to collectively
contribute money towards the effort without a profit margin
Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion;
asterisk-biz@lists.digium.com
Subject: [asterisk-biz] General development funding: discussion and
survey
[sending to -users and -biz in a slightly different format to broaden
participation]
Summary:
Would you help fund different Open-Source Asterisk
21 matches
Mail list logo
