On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 09:05:32AM +0200, Lars Dybdahl wrote:
> Jive seems to be a jabber server, and there is currently not a
> possibility to make Google Talk communicate with other jabber servers.
> However, the Google people have announced that this will come.
> They have some issues to deal w
Jive seems to be a jabber server, and there is currently not a
possibility to make Google Talk communicate with other jabber servers.
However, the Google people have announced that this will come.
They have some issues to deal with, including spim (spamming IM) and
that they probably coded their s
Lars:
I just took a look Asterisk IM
http://www.jivesoftware.org/asterisk-im/
Is there a way for Asterisk IM to work with GoogleTalk (which I understand uses Jabber)
Just wondering :)
On 8/26/05, Lars Dybdahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You don't.Google Talk is based on the jabber.org protocol, a
Tyler,
Google Talk, Skype, and Gizmo have licensed proprietary CODECs and some
other technology from Global IP Sound (GIPS). GIPS has build some
excellent jitter-resistant technology and do an excellent job of echo
cancelation and other stuff to make the audio quality at or above the
PSTN, e
On Fri, Aug 26, 2005 at 06:18:17PM +0200, Lars Dybdahl wrote:
> You don't.
> Google Talk is based on the jabber.org protocol, and as far as I
> understand, that's also the protocol that delivers the voice.
Google talk is based on the XMPP protocol (or is that XMP protocol)
which happened to be ma
You don't.
Google Talk is based on the jabber.org protocol, and as far as I
understand, that's also the protocol that delivers the voice.
Jabber is a decentralized protocol where everybody can set up their
own servers etc., and user identities is based on the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schema. This means
How do you connect GoogleTalk to Asterisk?
On 8/26/05, Lars Dybdahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On my computer, xten basically works well and better than Google Talk(which is noisy), but it is awful at controlling my sound card. Xtensimply isn't able to provide continuous sound, but has smallinterru
On my computer, xten basically works well and better than Google Talk
(which is noisy), but it is awful at controlling my sound card. Xten
simply isn't able to provide continuous sound, but has small
interrupts of a small fraction of a second very often. Skype and
Google Talk don't have these probl
Google Talk sounds great, Much better then the experiences I've had
with Xten with Asterisk using any of the supplied codecs. Does
anyone have any insight as why Google Talk would perform so much better
in a side by side comparison using the same network and same hardware?
T
On 8/25/05, Paul <[EM
Dana Olson wrote:
I have seen a softphone, not sure which one, but it uses G723 as well,
and it's free of charge. They use the Microsoft codec, so I guess they
say that means it's free?
--
Dana
It would probably be a microsoft supplied DLL library file. That means
it's only free to use on a
> > Flylabs.com - Communications and Information Technology
> > >
> > > Potosi 4456 12th floor "D"
> > > Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires (1199)
> > > Buenos Aires - Argentina
> > > +54-11-4983-8142
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
&g
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 12:00:01PM -0500, Eric Wieling aka ManxPower wrote:
> Steve Kennedy wrote:
> >Which voice codecs do you support?
> >Today, Google Talk supports the following standard voice codecs: PCMA,
> >PCMU, G.723, iLBC. We are also evaluating the Speex codec. We also
> >support codecs
AIL PROTECTED]
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Jonathan k. Creasy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion"
> >
> > Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2005 3:00 PM
> > Subject: RE: [Ast
On Fri, 26 Aug 2005, Rehan Ahmed AllahWala - Super Technologies I wrote:
> It has no echo what so ever like in skype.
>
> Xten has done a great job on letting service providers use sip, but it
> does not have the echo cancellation like in skype.
>
> So who will be the next mark spencer for the s
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion"
>
> Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2005 3:00 PM
> Subject: RE: [Asterisk-biz] www.google.com/talk/
>
>
> Another thought btw, who says they are paying those prices? Couldn't
>
> +54-11-4983-8142
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> - Original Message -
> From: "Jonathan k. Creasy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion"
>
> Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2005 3:00 PM
> Subject: RE: [Asterisk-b
ina
+54-11-4983-8142
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: "Jonathan k. Creasy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion"
Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2005 3:00 PM
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-biz] www.google.com/talk/
Anoth
sday, August 25, 2005 1:06 PM
To: Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-biz] www.google.com/talk/
Some?
Here is the licensing priceing info for G723.1 direct from the patent
holder's web site: http://www.dspg.com/technology/LicensePricing.html
Jona
iness-Oriented Asterisk Discussion
> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-biz] www.google.com/talk/
>
> Steve Kennedy wrote:
>
>
>>Which voice codecs do you support?
>>
>>Today, Google Talk supports the following standard voice codecs: PCMA,
>>PCMU, G.723, iLBC. We a
entum they need to make money on it
later...
-Jonathan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Wieling
aka ManxPower
Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2005 1:00 PM
To: Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-biz] www.
rsday, August 25, 2005 1:00 PM
To: Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-biz] www.google.com/talk/
Steve Kennedy wrote:
> Which voice codecs do you support?
>
> Today, Google Talk supports the following standard voice codecs: PCMA,
> PCMU, G.723,
Steve Kennedy wrote:
Which voice codecs do you support?
Today, Google Talk supports the following standard voice codecs: PCMA,
PCMU, G.723, iLBC. We are also evaluating the Speex codec. We also
support codecs from Global IP Sound: ISAC, IPCMWB, EG711U, EG711A
I'd love to know how they support
On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 01:48:31PM -0500, Jason Garland wrote:
> I ran the RTP packets thru a VoIP packet analyzer and it could not
> identify the audio codec. It also could not identify the initiation
> protocol. The whole thing is proprietary.
Which voice codecs do you support?
Today, Google
eID=102539
-Original Message-
From: Douglas Logan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 12:58 PM
To: Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-biz] www.google.com/talk/
http://www.google.com/talk/developer.html#protocols
http://www.googl
I knew it uses Jabber but the codecs were a mystery to me because Hammer
Call couldn't identify them. I guess I should have read the docs. :)
Douglas Logan wrote:
http://www.google.com/talk/developer.html#protocols
http://www.google.com/talk/developer.html#codecs
It is not proprietary.
In
http://www.google.com/talk/developer.html#protocols
http://www.google.com/talk/developer.html#codecs
It is not proprietary.
In fact, this should work with it and Asterisk
http://www.jivesoftware.org/asterisk-im/
On 8/24/05, Jason Garland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I ran the RTP packets thru a
I ran the RTP packets thru a VoIP packet analyzer and it could not
identify the audio codec. It also could not identify the initiation
protocol. The whole thing is proprietary.
- Jason
Rehan Ahmed AllahWala - Super Technologies I wrote:
Dear All,
Is any one using this yet ?
http://www.goog
27 matches
Mail list logo
