--
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Thursday, 12 April 2007 3:19 AM
To: 'Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion'
Subject: RE: [asterisk-biz] G.722 VoIP Providers
No. PSTN is 8 kHz and 8 bit. It cannot be 722.
--Mike
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alexander Lopez wrote:
> You could always get 23 of these!!!
>
> http://www.audioinvest.no/dbx/products/dbx4bx.htm
It's basically just a gate. It would only be useful if you compressed
the sound at one end and the expanded it back at the other end.
TED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian
> > Fertig
> > Sent: Monday, April 02, 2007 12:39 PM
> >
> > To: 'Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion'
> > Subject: RE: [asterisk-biz] G.722 VoIP Providers
> >
> > To:
s-Oriented Asterisk Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-biz] G.722 VoIP Providers
Not if you want wideband support, since PRIs use an 8KHz sampled channel
and trying to squeeze 16KHz down it just isn't doable. Its pretty much
limited to data networks only...
To allow wideband support to a PSTN gatewa
Not if you want wideband support, since PRIs use an 8KHz sampled channel and
trying to squeeze 16KHz down it just isn't doable. Its pretty much limited
to data networks only...
To allow wideband support to a PSTN gateway it would need to be resampled,
and its not just the small hit of transcoding
a higher audio quality while not suffering a bandwidth hit.
>
>
>
> --Mike
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Brian Fertig
> Sent: Monday, April 02, 2007 12:39 PM
>
> To: 'Commercial and Busin
02, 2007 12:39 PM
To: 'Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion'
Subject: RE: [asterisk-biz] G.722 VoIP Providers
To: 'Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion'
Subject: RE: [asterisk-biz] G.722 VoIP Providers
Pardon my ignorance, but what is th
lf Of Brian Fertig
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2007 12:39 PM
To: 'Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion'
Subject: RE: [asterisk-biz] G.722 VoIP Providers
Pardon my ignorance, but what is the big deal about g722? I haven't read up
much on it.
--
::
ECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2007 1:25 PM
To: 'Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion'
Subject: RE: [asterisk-biz] G.722 VoIP Providers
This is something we should strive for as this is most definitely something
the PSTN is unable to prov
Subject: Re: [asterisk-biz] G.722 VoIP Providers
If I remember correctly 1.4 provides pass-thru support and trunk will trans
code and have prompts in G722.
On 4/2/07, Mike Hammett < [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote:
Does Asterisk even support 722? I'd
Bruce Reeves wrote:
> If I remember correctly 1.4 provides pass-thru support and trunk will
> trans code and have prompts in G722.
Asterisk 1.4 supports pass-through and recording/playback, so it has
G.722 prompts available as well.
___
--Bandwidth and C
On Apr 2, 2007, at 11:00 AM, Dean Collins wrote:
Does anyone know if there is a license fee for the codec? Eg if an
ITSP wants to implement this what costs are involved? And as soon
as it hits the PSTN does it really make a difference?
Personally I think it’s a great concept and all Aste
If I remember correctly 1.4 provides pass-thru support and trunk will trans
code and have prompts in G722.
On 4/2/07, Mike Hammett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Does Asterisk even support 722? I'd love it if it did.
--Mike
*From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf
Brian is right about the codec changing over the pstn and likely over many
ITSP's. I would say though, that we have deployed 4 of these phones with our
Asterisk 1.2 system, and while we are not sending G722 to the phone the
quality of the audio and speakerphone during conferences has been
impressi
Yeah, I just realized that after reading further. So, the HD quality is
only good for interoffice communications. Cool phone though.
On 4/2/07, Brian Fertig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't know of anyone supporting this codec. Also the only way to fully
utilize the HD portion of the po
ilto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Fertig
Sent: Monday, 2 April 2007 11:39 AM
To: 'Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion'
Subject: RE: [asterisk-biz] G.722 VoIP Providers
I don't know of anyone supporting this codec. Also the only way to
fully utilize the HD p
Discussion'
Subject: RE: [asterisk-biz] G.722 VoIP Providers
I don't know of anyone supporting this codec. Also the only way to fully
utilize the HD portion of the polycom is to have one on both ends. Your
chances of one of your customers having that phone on the end he is dialing
t
Does Asterisk even support 722? I'd love it if it did.
--Mike
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Glenn Campbell
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2007 10:34 AM
To: Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion
Subject: [asterisk-biz] G.722 VoIP Providers
I don't know of anyone supporting this codec. Also the only way to fully
utilize the HD portion of the polycom is to have one on both ends. Your
chances of one of your customers having that phone on the end he is dialing
to is slim especially if it hits the PSTN or gets transcoded along the way.
19 matches
Mail list logo
