I have a similar setup(Tyan MB, Dual opteron etc). It's not the
CPU's that your going to run up against, it's the bandwidth to your
hard drives.
You will probably need to use a memory filesystem and transfer to
hard drives after recording is finished.
Unfortunately some of the tyan dual
Behalf Of Matthew Rubenstein
> Sent: Monday, 5 June 2006 04:18
> To: Asterisk-Biz
> Subject: Re: [asterisk-biz] Performance on Pentium Dual Core
CPUs
>
> These hard capacity numbers are very useful, though not
exactly
> comprehensive or conclusive. There are too many
test the system
> capacity.
>
> That should be almost "perfect" real life scenario.
>
> Regards
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-biz-
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthew Rubenstein
> > Sent: Monda
inal Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-biz-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthew Rubenstein
> Sent: Monday, 5 June 2006 04:18
> To: Asterisk-Biz
> Subject: Re: [asterisk-biz] Performance on Pentium Dual Core CPUs
>
> These hard capacity numbers are very
Our company will get a dual core dual cpu opteron with 2gb ram on a Tyan Board.
The goal is to try to achieve a doing 400 channels ulaw at the same
time while recording the calls.
The setup is this:
200 sip phones---asteriskx86_64---internet-sip terminator ulaw
since it's a call
Hello,
I have Asterisk running on Solaris 10 on both Sparc and AMD. The performance of the system is greater on Solaris compared with Linux, due to many factors. The most gains are received when using mtmalloc library. Here's a link to a report I've done. However, do keep in mind that the
server was doing nothing else but transcoding
> > all active code and data was cached in CPU's L2.
> >
> > This makes all kind of benchmarking useless as far as I can see as it is
> > almost impossible to replicate a working system with test tools.
> >
> > I welc
I'm curious if anyone is running Asterisk on Sun Fire T2000 or similar
UltraSPARC T1 servers.
Or maybe generally running Asterisk over Sparc in production
environment.
Anyone? Any comments about performance using Sparc?
Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
- Sergey Kuznetsov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w
ubject: Re: [asterisk-biz] Performance on Pentium Dual Core CPUs
- Sergey Kuznetsov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Can you share your expectations how many G729 transcodings can be done
on dual dual-core Opterons or P4 with 4 Gb of memory on SIP-to-SIP
environments ( no TDM or echoc
s
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin P.
Fleming
Sent: Monday, 5 June 2006 02:53
To: Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-biz] Performance on Pentium Dual Core CPUs
- Sergey Kuznetsov <[EMA
- Sergey Kuznetsov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can you share your expectations how many G729 transcodings can be done
>
> on dual dual-core Opterons or P4 with 4 Gb of memory on SIP-to-SIP
> environments ( no TDM or echocancelers involved)
> My guess is about 250-300 simultaneous calls.
I
ercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-biz] Performance on Pentium Dual Core CPUs
Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
> - Craig Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>> PS. Dual processors are overkill unless you have an Asterisk version
>> th
Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
- Craig Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
PS. Dual processors are overkill unless you have an Asterisk version
that supports it (we don't).
I don't know what you are talking about here... Asterisk is a heavily threaded
application, and will take full adv
- Craig Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> PS. Dual processors are overkill unless you have an Asterisk version
> that supports it (we don't).
I don't know what you are talking about here... Asterisk is a heavily threaded
application, and will take full advantage of the number of process
iz@lists.digium.com
Subject: RE: [asterisk-biz] Performance on Pentium Dual Core CPUs
Craig,
Quoting Craig Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Mitul
> If you're only doing pass through (no transcoding from G711 to G729)
and
> no call recording then there should be no problem.
>
Craig,
Quoting Craig Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Mitul
If you're only doing pass through (no transcoding from G711 to G729) and
no call recording then there should be no problem.
I'm assuming you won't be trying to setup 50 calls at the same time.
Basically this system is for a call c
Mitul
If you're only doing pass through (no transcoding from G711 to G729) and
no call recording then there should be no problem.
I'm assuming you won't be trying to setup 50 calls at the same time.
Regards
Craig Lawrence
Mytel Voice & Data Pty Ltd
Communicate the Smart Way
119 Ferrars St
17 matches
Mail list logo
