Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 3335: [res_config_odbc] Fix for nullable integer columns and keyfield existence check in update_odbc

2014-03-18 Thread zvision
On March 17, 2014, 9:28 a.m., zvision wrote: > > So, the changes look good. But that regression thing is .. not so nice. > > > > For trunk and up, we could change the behaviour. But we can't for 1.8..12. > > > > The options are: > > > > - leave the bug in place, only fix in trunk > > > > - ch

[asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 3375: [res_config_odbc/res_odbc] Fixed handling of non-text columns updates with empty values

2014-03-18 Thread zvision
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3375/ --- Review request for Asterisk Developers. Bugs: ASTERISK-23459 https://i

Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 3335: [res_config_odbc] Fix for nullable integer columns and keyfield existence check in update_odbc

2014-03-18 Thread zvision
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3335/ --- (Updated March 18, 2014, 10:42 p.m.) Review request for Asterisk Developer

Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 3371: assigned-uniqueids: Misc cleanup and fixes.

2014-03-18 Thread rmudgett
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3371/ --- (Updated March 18, 2014, 5:11 p.m.) Review request for Asterisk Developers

Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 3209: Crash in ast_format_cmp on shutdown

2014-03-18 Thread Corey Farrell
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3209/#review11255 --- I would like to propose we backport ast_register_cleanup, use t

[asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 3374: testsuite: Verify that each of three users entering a conference enters muted when using the startmuted user profile option

2014-03-18 Thread Jonathan Rose
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3374/ --- Review request for Asterisk Developers. Bugs: ASTERISK-23461 https://i

Re: [asterisk-dev] JIRA, Commit Messages, and Smart Commits (oh my)

2014-03-18 Thread Mark Michelson
To answer my own question, yes there are some other commands, but they're not really useful for typical ASTERISK issues on the issue tracker (time-tracking commands and workflow transition commands). Mark Michelson Tuesday, March 18, 2014 2:24 PM It'll take some g

Re: [asterisk-dev] JIRA, Commit Messages, and Smart Commits (oh my)

2014-03-18 Thread Mark Michelson
It'll take some getting used to, but I don't mind switching. Are there other handy commands besides #close and #comment that you can use? Oh, and be sure to update the wiki page that has the commit message template! Matthew Jordan Tuesday, March 18, 2014 1:25 PM Hey

[asterisk-dev] JIRA, Commit Messages, and Smart Commits (oh my)

2014-03-18 Thread Matthew Jordan
Hey everyone - Due to a security vulnerability in JIRA, we recently had to upgrade JIRA to version 6.2. While this was a good thing (tm), it did break the snot out of the Subversion plugin. That plugin does a number of things; one of those things is auto-closing issues based on the commit message.

Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 3330: Testsuite: e( ) Options BridgeWait Application

2014-03-18 Thread Scott Emidy
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3330/ --- (Updated March 18, 2014, 1:19 p.m.) Status -- This change has been ma

Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 3327: Test for endmarked users in confbridge

2014-03-18 Thread Benjamin Keith Ford
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3327/ --- (Updated March 18, 2014, 1:01 p.m.) Status -- This change has been ma

Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 3328: Agent Acknowledgement Nominal and Error Tests

2014-03-18 Thread Benjamin Keith Ford
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3328/ --- (Updated March 18, 2014, 12:58 p.m.) Status -- This change has been m

Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 3370: masquerade-supertest: Relax DTMF timing requirements.

2014-03-18 Thread rmudgett
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3370/ --- (Updated March 18, 2014, 12:47 p.m.) Status -- This change has been m

Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 3373: app_confbridge: Users with start_muted set aren't starting muted (although the first appears to)

2014-03-18 Thread rmudgett
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3373/#review11283 --- Ship it! Ship It! - rmudgett On March 18, 2014, 12:43 p.m.,

[asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 3373: app_confbridge: Users with start_muted set aren't starting muted (although the first appears to)

2014-03-18 Thread Jonathan Rose
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3373/ --- Review request for Asterisk Developers, Matt Jordan and rmudgett. Bugs: AS

Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 3372: Allow local ICE candidates to be overridden with specified address

2014-03-18 Thread Sean Bright
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3372/#review11282 --- I hadn't considered multihomed machines when I wrote this patch

Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 3330: Testsuite: e( ) Options BridgeWait Application

2014-03-18 Thread Scott Emidy
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3330/ --- (Updated March 18, 2014, 12:29 p.m.) Status -- This change has been m

Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 3371: assigned-uniqueids: Misc cleanup and fixes.

2014-03-18 Thread rmudgett
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3371/ --- (Updated March 18, 2014, 12:09 p.m.) Review request for Asterisk Developer

[asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 3371: assigned-uniqueids: Misc cleanup and fixes.

2014-03-18 Thread rmudgett
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3371/ --- Review request for Asterisk Developers. Repository: Asterisk Description

[asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 3372: Allow local ICE candidates to be overridden with specified address

2014-03-18 Thread Sean Bright
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3372/ --- Review request for Asterisk Developers. Repository: Asterisk Description

Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 3349: Implement RFC-3966 TEL URI incoming INVITE

2014-03-18 Thread Corey Farrell
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3349/#review11266 --- /trunk/channels/sip/reqresp_parser.c

Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 3370: masquerade-supertest: Relax DTMF timing requirements.

2014-03-18 Thread Matt Jordan
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3370/#review11281 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Matt Jordan On March 18, 2014, 11:45 a.

Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 3315: BridgeWait Roles Test

2014-03-18 Thread Benjamin Keith Ford
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3315/ --- (Updated March 18, 2014, 11:50 a.m.) Status -- This change has been m

[asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 3370: masquerade-supertest: Relax DTMF timing requirements.

2014-03-18 Thread rmudgett
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3370/ --- Review request for Asterisk Developers. Bugs: ASTERISK-22846 https://i

Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 3320: media_formats: Move format modules over.

2014-03-18 Thread Matt Jordan
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3320/#review11280 --- /team/group/media_formats-reviewed/formats/format_h263.c

Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 3318: media_formats: Move bridges over.

2014-03-18 Thread Matt Jordan
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3318/#review11279 --- /team/group/media_formats-reviewed/bridges/bridge_softmix.c

Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 3319: media_formats: Add some additional functionality to core.

2014-03-18 Thread Matt Jordan
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3319/#review11278 --- /team/group/media_formats-reviewed/include/asterisk/frame.h

Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 3335: [res_config_odbc] Fix for nullable integer columns and keyfield existence check in update_odbc

2014-03-18 Thread wdoekes
On March 17, 2014, 9:28 a.m., zvision wrote: > > So, the changes look good. But that regression thing is .. not so nice. > > > > For trunk and up, we could change the behaviour. But we can't for 1.8..12. > > > > The options are: > > > > - leave the bug in place, only fix in trunk > > > > - ch

Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 3335: [res_config_odbc] Fix for nullable integer columns and keyfield existence check in update_odbc

2014-03-18 Thread wdoekes
On March 17, 2014, 9:28 a.m., zvision wrote: > > So, the changes look good. But that regression thing is .. not so nice. > > > > For trunk and up, we could change the behaviour. But we can't for 1.8..12. > > > > The options are: > > > > - leave the bug in place, only fix in trunk > > > > - ch

Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 3335: [res_config_odbc] Fix for nullable integer columns and keyfield existence check in update_odbc

2014-03-18 Thread zvision
On March 17, 2014, 9:28 a.m., zvision wrote: > > So, the changes look good. But that regression thing is .. not so nice. > > > > For trunk and up, we could change the behaviour. But we can't for 1.8..12. > > > > The options are: > > > > - leave the bug in place, only fix in trunk > > > > - ch

Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 3335: [res_config_odbc] Fix for nullable integer columns and keyfield existence check in update_odbc

2014-03-18 Thread wdoekes
On March 17, 2014, 9:28 a.m., zvision wrote: > > So, the changes look good. But that regression thing is .. not so nice. > > > > For trunk and up, we could change the behaviour. But we can't for 1.8..12. > > > > The options are: > > > > - leave the bug in place, only fix in trunk > > > > - ch

Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 3359: res_stasis: Extend bridge type to include attributes

2014-03-18 Thread Matt Jordan
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3359/#review11273 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Matt Jordan On March 17, 2014, 8:57 a.m

Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 3360: ARI: allow json content type with zero length body

2014-03-18 Thread Scott Griepentrog
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3360/ --- (Updated March 18, 2014, 9:51 a.m.) Status -- This change has been ma

Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 3335: [res_config_odbc] Fix for nullable integer columns and keyfield existence check in update_odbc

2014-03-18 Thread zvision
On March 17, 2014, 9:28 a.m., zvision wrote: > > So, the changes look good. But that regression thing is .. not so nice. > > > > For trunk and up, we could change the behaviour. But we can't for 1.8..12. > > > > The options are: > > > > - leave the bug in place, only fix in trunk > > > > - ch

Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 3360: ARI: allow json content type with zero length body

2014-03-18 Thread Matt Jordan
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3360/#review11271 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Matt Jordan On March 18, 2014, 9:17 a.m

Re: [asterisk-dev] Alembic in 12 SVN

2014-03-18 Thread Russell Bryant
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Matthew Jordan wrote: > On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 8:31 AM, Russell Bryant > wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 1:01 PM, Joshua Colp wrote: > >> > >> Matthew Jordan wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> > >>> > >>> Technically, it's probably not hard. I wonder how horrible

Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 3360: ARI: allow json content type with zero length body

2014-03-18 Thread Scott Griepentrog
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3360/ --- (Updated March 18, 2014, 9:17 a.m.) Review request for Asterisk Developers

Re: [asterisk-dev] Alembic in 12 SVN

2014-03-18 Thread Matthew Jordan
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 8:31 AM, Russell Bryant wrote: > On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 1:01 PM, Joshua Colp wrote: >> >> Matthew Jordan wrote: >> >> >> >> >>> >>> Technically, it's probably not hard. I wonder how horrible it'd be for >>> end users, however. >>> >> >> Probably pretty horrible, since it

Re: [asterisk-dev] Alembic in 12 SVN

2014-03-18 Thread Russell Bryant
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 1:01 PM, Joshua Colp wrote: > Matthew Jordan wrote: > > > > > >> Technically, it's probably not hard. I wonder how horrible it'd be for >> end users, however. >> >> > Probably pretty horrible, since it's basically changing everything. Well ... you completely drop suppor

Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 3343: res_pjsip: Enable DNS support.

2014-03-18 Thread Joshua Colp
> On March 18, 2014, 12:43 p.m., wdoekes wrote: > > /branches/12/res/res_pjsip/config_system.c, lines 200-206 > > > > > > No ao2_ref(discovered_nameservers, -1); here? Fixed in SVN, cheers! - Joshua ---

Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 3343: res_pjsip: Enable DNS support.

2014-03-18 Thread wdoekes
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3343/#review11269 --- I realise this was committed already, but: /branches/12/res/r

Re: [asterisk-dev] [asterisk-commits] mjordan: branch 11 r409990 - /branches/11/res/res_fax_spandsp.c

2014-03-18 Thread Sean Bright
On 3/17/2014 9:48 AM, Matthew Jordan wrote: Ugh. That stinks - there was no g711_free in 0.0.5. Looks like we're going to need a patch for this that examines the libspandsp version and uses one or the other. This has been fixed: http://svnview.digium.com/svn/asterisk?view=revision&revision=41

Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 3349: Implement RFC-3966 TEL URI incoming INVITE

2014-03-18 Thread wdoekes
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3349/#review11268 --- Ship it! The changes make me happy. - wdoekes On March 17,