Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 4025: pjsip_cli: Suppress header print on error or no objects

2014-09-29 Thread Brad Latus
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4025/#review13394 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Brad Latus On Sept. 26, 2014, 4:26

Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 4025: pjsip_cli: Suppress header print on error or no objects

2014-09-29 Thread Brad Latus
On Sept. 29, 2014, 6:37 a.m., Brad Latus wrote: Ship It! Works for me.. Tried few different pjsip show commands. - Brad --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:

Re: [asterisk-dev] unsubscribe

2014-09-29 Thread Steven Howes
On 29 Sep 2014, at 01:02, Curtis Raams cra...@staff.ains.net.au wrote: unsubscribe There are instructions on the bottom of each email. VVV that bit there VVV-- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by

[asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 4031: Realtime peers are never unref: memory leaks

2014-09-29 Thread ibercom
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4031/ --- Review request for Asterisk Developers. Bugs: ASTERISK-22945

Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 4031: Realtime peers are never unref: memory leaks

2014-09-29 Thread wdoekes
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4031/#review13396 --- Did you check the behaviour in 1.8? - wdoekes On Sept. 29,

Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 4025: pjsip_cli: Suppress header print on error or no objects

2014-09-29 Thread rmudgett
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4025/#review13397 --- Ship it! Ship It! - rmudgett On Sept. 26, 2014, 11:26

Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 4031: Realtime peers are never unref: memory leaks

2014-09-29 Thread ibercom
On Sept. 29, 2014, 3:16 p.m., wdoekes wrote: Did you check the behaviour in 1.8? The same. Although in 1.8 the leaks are less. I run the same patch in both. - ibercom --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:

Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 4031: Realtime peers are never unref: memory leaks

2014-09-29 Thread wdoekes
On Sept. 29, 2014, 3:16 p.m., wdoekes wrote: Did you check the behaviour in 1.8? ibercom wrote: The same. Although in 1.8 the leaks are less. I run the same patch in both. Very well. Then please put the lowest living asterisk branch where the problem is in the

[asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 4032: PJSIP: Force transport on contact rewrite

2014-09-29 Thread opticron
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4032/ --- Review request for Asterisk Developers. Repository: Asterisk

Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 4031: Realtime peers are never unref: memory leaks

2014-09-29 Thread ibercom
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4031/ --- (Updated Sept. 29, 2014, 7:25 p.m.) Review request for Asterisk

Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 4032: PJSIP: Force transport on contact rewrite

2014-09-29 Thread Joshua Colp
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4032/#review13400 --- branches/12/res/res_pjsip_nat.c

Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 4032: PJSIP: Force transport on contact rewrite

2014-09-29 Thread opticron
On Sept. 29, 2014, 2:47 p.m., Joshua Colp wrote: branches/12/res/res_pjsip_nat.c, line 49 https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4032/diff/1/?file=67680#file67680line49 What will this do for UDP transport? For those the transport should be empty. udp is also a valid transport along

[asterisk-dev] Confbridge Performance using G722 @ max 3 Party in 1 conference.

2014-09-29 Thread bala murugan
hi , Has anyone tried measuring the asterisk (10 or 11 or12) performance against the Confbrdige Application using G722 HD codec with atleast 3 party in 1 conference . If yes can you please provide me what tool was used to measure this performance , it is hard to get a tool that supports g722

Re: [asterisk-dev] Confbridge Performance using G722 @ max 3 Party in 1 conference.

2014-09-29 Thread Leif Madsen
Why not just use another Asterisk machine that you front with SIPp? Trigger the channels from SIPp into Asterisk box A, have that box call Asterisk box B via G.722, then you can measure the performance of Asterisk box B. Asterisk box A would just be a transcoder essentially for you. Leif. On 29

Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 4031: Realtime peers are never unref: memory leaks

2014-09-29 Thread wdoekes
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4031/#review13403 --- Ship it! Ship It! - wdoekes On Sept. 29, 2014, 7:25 p.m.,

Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 4032: PJSIP: Force transport on contact rewrite

2014-09-29 Thread Joshua Colp
On Sept. 29, 2014, 7:47 p.m., Joshua Colp wrote: branches/12/res/res_pjsip_nat.c, line 49 https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4032/diff/1/?file=67680#file67680line49 What will this do for UDP transport? For those the transport should be empty. opticron wrote: udp is also a

Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 4025: pjsip_cli: Suppress header print on error or no objects

2014-09-29 Thread George Joseph
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4025/ --- (Updated Sept. 29, 2014, 4:58 p.m.) Status -- This change has been

[asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 4033: manager/config: Enhancements to support templates and non-unique category names via AMI

2014-09-29 Thread George Joseph
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4033/ --- Review request for Asterisk Developers. Repository: Asterisk

[asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 4034: chan_pjsip: Fix deadlock when masquerading PJSIP channels.

2014-09-29 Thread rmudgett
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4034/ --- Review request for Asterisk Developers. Bugs: ASTERISK-24356

Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 4032: PJSIP: Force transport on contact rewrite

2014-09-29 Thread opticron
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4032/ --- (Updated Sept. 29, 2014, 6:53 p.m.) Review request for Asterisk