---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4038/
---
(Updated Oct. 29, 2014, 5:04 a.m.)
Review request for Asterisk
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4122/#review13604
---
/asterisk/trunk/tests/pbx/dialplan_reload/run-test
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4038/#review13605
---
/asterisk/trunk/contrib/scripts/refleaks-summary
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4038/
---
(Updated Oct. 29, 2014, 5:47 a.m.)
Review request for Asterisk
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4126/
---
Review request for Asterisk Developers.
Bugs: ASTERISK-24190
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4038/#review13606
---
Ship it!
LGTM.
/asterisk/trunk/runtests.py
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4094/#review13607
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- wdoekes
On Oct. 17, 2014, 11:16 a.m.,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4117/
---
(Updated Oct. 29, 2014, 5:33 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
On Oct. 29, 2014, 5:18 a.m., wdoekes wrote:
/asterisk/trunk/tests/pbx/dialplan_reload/run-test, line 64
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4122/diff/1/?file=68588#file68588line64
Is it needed to callLater() instead of just calling it? Applies to the
other 0-second callLaters too.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4122/
---
(Updated Oct. 29, 2014, 7:27 a.m.)
Review request for Asterisk Developers
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3992/#review13611
---
I suggest reusing the 'media_encryption' pjsip.conf option
On Oct. 29, 2014, 1:49 p.m., jbigelow wrote:
I suggest reusing the 'media_encryption' pjsip.conf option with possible
values of 'yes', 'no', 'attempt'/'try' instead of a new option. If not I
suggest renaming the option to something like 'media_encryption_attempt' or
Hi,
I've been reading recent emails on the developers list and just wanted
to add my 2 cents:
While the AGI approach was never useful for my needs, I recently
finished 2 years of almost straight development time to develop a
full-fledged call answering solution and I would be VERY annoyed
On Oct. 29, 2014, 8:49 a.m., jbigelow wrote:
I suggest reusing the 'media_encryption' pjsip.conf option with possible
values of 'yes', 'no', 'attempt'/'try' instead of a new option. If not I
suggest renaming the option to something like 'media_encryption_attempt' or
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4126/#review13614
---
/branches/1.8/apps/app_voicemail.c
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4126/#review13610
---
/branches/1.8/apps/app_voicemail.c
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4124/#review13616
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Matt Jordan
On Oct. 28, 2014, 11:22
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4125/#review13615
---
Ship it!
One more queue_unref(q) needed and this should be
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4121/#review13617
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Matt Jordan
On Oct. 28, 2014, 4:19
On Oct. 29, 2014, 2:41 p.m., Matt Jordan wrote:
/branches/1.8/apps/app_voicemail.c, lines 3233-3243
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4126/diff/1/?file=68594#file68594line3233
The struct vm_state in vm_execmain is allocated on the stack.
init_vm_state is called on it if
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4126/
---
(Updated Oct. 29, 2014, 3:40 p.m.)
Review request for Asterisk
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4119/#review13619
---
Ship it!
/branches/12/res/res_pjsip_outbound_registration.c
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/2964/#review13620
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- opticron
On Oct. 10, 2014, 8:18 a.m.,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4099/#review13621
---
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4126/#review13622
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Matt Jordan
On Oct. 29, 2014, 10:40
On Oct 28, 2014, at 5:03 PM, Ben Langfeld b...@langfeld.me wrote:
On 28 October 2014 19:47, Derek Andrew derek.and...@usask.ca wrote:
What is the alternative to the dial plan? Is everyone talking about getting
rid of the statements like:
exten = s,1,
what is the alternative?
Remote
On 10/28/2014 06:03 PM, Ben Langfeld wrote:
On 28 October 2014 19:47, Derek Andrew derek.and...@usask.ca
mailto:derek.and...@usask.ca wrote:
What is the alternative to the dial plan? Is everyone talking about getting
rid of the statements like:
exten = s,1,
what is the alternative?
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4125/
---
(Updated Oct. 29, 2014, 4:33 p.m.)
Review request for Asterisk
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4101/#review13624
---
/trunk/res/ari/resource_channels.c
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4116/#review13625
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- opticron
On Oct. 27, 2014, 4:43 p.m.,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4120/#review13626
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- opticron
On Oct. 28, 2014, 2:45 p.m.,
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Paul Albrecht palbre...@glccom.com
wrote:
None of said “discussion” ever happened on the lists nor was the broader
Asterisk community involved as far as I can determine. A parallel
“discussion” was started by a shill at AstiCon this year to begin to get
the
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4120/#review13627
---
As an addendum to opticron's Ship It: This needs a test.
-
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4107/#review13623
---
Configuring res_pjsip for Presence Subscriptions
Under the
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4114/#review13628
---
1) In stringfields.h:ast_string_field_ptr_set_by_fields(), the
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/2478/
---
(Updated Oct. 29, 2014, 8:39 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3437/
---
(Updated Oct. 29, 2014, 8:57 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
37 matches
Mail list logo
